[ubermik]

@forumhostpb wrote:

So …. back to the plot.

I see from yesterday’s UK press that the ‘beatified’ McCanns are now complaining bitterly about the media intrusion into their lives; about how they cannot even go for a simple walk together (with the expressionless Mrs McCann grasping a child’s toy for media effect) without being ‘hounded’ by reporters and cameras.

It even seems that the Portuguese press are now openly suggesting that Maddie died in the flat where she was abandoned by her parents; they allege that she was somehow poisoned and that the McCanns concealed this; they are saying that her body was later on removed in a car hired for the purpose and that it was concealed whilst the Police conducted their initial searches.

Of course and as you would expect, the McCanns are strongly denying this version of events and sticking to their story that a complete and utter total stranger forcibly broke into the flat (through an unlocked door) and abducted Maddie leaving absolutely no forensic trace whatsoever.

I can’t help wondering if the tide of public opinion is beginning to turn against the sainted McCanns.

And yet by contrast, when the media were textually showering them with “poor you”‘s they didnt seem to see it as an intrusion and didnt seem to be able to get enough press “intrusion” into their and their two remaining kids lives

So is it the actual intrusion they dislike or the fact the press has got past the socially indoctrinated knee jerk response and is now being more objective thats the problem?

[ubermik]

PMSL, on a discussion board pretty much every post is someone “biting” innit?

But to grown ups is called responding or joining in with the discussion

Whereas comments that arent related in anyway to the content of the thread and arent any actual form of reply to the contents of previous posts really are “biting” or just someone with nothing to say who feels the need they should say “something” no matter how vaccuous or erroneous that something is

[ubermik]

??
“humouress”?

Is that the female version of humour then? :lol:

[ubermik]

King herod had a solution :wink:

[ubermik]

Could you point out where the hypocricy would be then fasty? Hpw leaving a three year old alone in a hotel room to go drinking in ANY way, any way whatsoever even comes close to resembling this instance?

Reacting differently to DIFFERENT scenarios isnt hypocrisy its thinking freely, hypocrisy is reacting differently to the SAME scenario as and when it suits, and reacting identically to DIFFERENT scenarios is just idiocy

[ubermik]

Waspish, deportation and immigrant status was mentioned in the thread header, whether the person was black, yellow or blue with pink stripes doesnt really matter, just the status of them with respect to their residency here

But as you were responding to the thread AND were talking about the actual topic the thread is about rather than posting about how you agree that fuel tax is too high or some other unrelated topic its a pretty safe bet that you have read the thread header or sharons others points where she also mentions deportation

Oh, and the post you initially commented on although just after yours wasnt a response to it and was actually in response to Sharons post

[ubermik]

What you did, do or claim to have done elsewhere is a bit irrelevant TM, what I WAS responding to WAS what you had written which stands or falls on its own merits and isnt changed either in intent, meaning or irrelevance to THIS topic by anything else

Such a statement WOULD have been a valid contribution AFTER someone had (as some probably will) made such a comment, but nobody did and might never have done

And even if they did it would still be THEIR opinion anyway, their view, something you were argueing SHOULD be allowed to be stated without “bullying” on another thread as I recall, or is that just YOUR view you think deserves that courtesy?

However to most people this is nothing at all like the other thread in any way shape or form not leastly because of the age difference irrespective of anything else so I wouldnt have really expected a comment like the one you are claiming to be trying to pre-empt really and I dont think you would either if you were being honest with yourself so I still stand by my initial comment that it had no place or relevance here other than being at least partly driven by your obvious frustration on the other thread

Right or wrong, and lets face it, even if right you’d hardly admit that. Its MY opinion I posted and one I still wholeheartedly stand by

But thats all I have to say on this matter so as not to divert this thread any further (apologies to goony for my initial diversion too btw)

[ubermik]

@Bad Manners wrote:

@cas wrote:

BM ,,,,,,,,,,I wont have a problem at all in holding my hands up and saying I was wrong,,,,,,,IF!! its proven that the parents didn’t actually have anything to do with the dissapearance of Maddie……I just don’t think tha theyre as innocent as they would have the general public believe, thst my opinion at the moment, who knows

IF!! . :lol:
Do you know something I dont Cas? As far as I know there is no evidence linking the McCanns to their Daughters dissaperance in anyway. Just a load of innuendo, Newspaper and Internet Message Board Gossip. The way you say IF!! it’s as if there is already a load of ready made evidence against them? :

OMG, Theres two of them at it now haha :lol: :lol: :lol:

BM, IF means IF, it really is as simple as that, the same way “I think” DOESNT mean the same as “I know for an incontrivertible fact”

Just because you CHOOSE to read it that way doesnt mean your grasp of the english language of cognitive interpretation of grammatical substance is adequate

Oh and…..

Do you know something I dont Bad MAnners? As far as I know there is no evidence detaching the McCanns from their Daughters dissaperance in anyway. Just a load of touchy feeling closed minds, Newspaper and Internet Message Board views. The way you say IT!! it’s as if there is already a load of ready made evidence againstProving theyre innocence?

[ubermik]

@token_male wrote:

It doesnt end on this site you know?

life does go on, conversations happen elsewhere,

It doesnt matter what i thin has happened or what i think the parents have or have not done wrong

in my mind its my opinion and i think my opinion is correct otherwise it wouldnt be mine would it?

and no amount of clever writing and patronising statements will bully me into thinking otherwise.

HAHAHAHA, OMG just how thick ARE you?

Try reading back what you just wrote. you THINK they are innocent, JUST like OTHER people THINK they arent

Its YOUR view, JUST like the opposite one is OTHER peoples view

Yet your whinging about being left alone to hold and express YOUR view without being “bullied” about it, well try reading your own posts in response to OTHER people stating THEIR views, the ones that YOU dont agree with and then contemplate whether THEY wouldnt also like the exact same consideration that youre saying YOU should have

Infact while at it re read my posts, because thats exactly what I’ve been pointing out to you all along, that YOU dont know they ARE innocent the same as nobody else KNOWS they arent, everu view on the matter is JUST an opinion with no facts or knowledge to back them up, people on both sides ARE just stating a view but its YOU that was talking about “right” and “wrong” which has no place or relevance to the stating of opinions and crying about being “bullied” just because everyone doesnt agree with you is a bit nonsensical on a DISCUSSION site (apologies if you thought it was a pandering arse licking site btw, maybe you should try somewhere with “dating” in the site name lol)

Maybe you should try applying the mindset youre asking others to apply to you TO other people and also stop whinging when you get exactly the same back as you dish out coz it just makes you look like a spoilt insecure knob who cant function without total agreement and thinks your views and opinions are in some way more important or relevant than other peoples

Playing the poor pleading wounded soul AFTER spewing vehemence is only either manipulative deviousness or the sign of schitzophrenia and totally lacks consistency and integrity

[ubermik]

Well duh at you token

How can people saying they MIGHT have done it be wrong? Its not a conclusive statement its a non perjorative speculation, whereas you however ARE making a conclusive statement in your wholly innacurate contradictions of things that havent even been said

Youre the only one at the moment that seems to be trying to claim categorically that they have or havent, and therefore you are the ONLY person who could be proven wrong

For someone to be proven wrong they first in a total absence of actually knowing for a fact need to have proclaimed they are “right”, can you in your miniscule wisdom actually find a place where thats been said other than your own groundless presumptions?

Because without that anything said is merely speculative possibility, not a claim of factual knowledge seeing as there isnt any factual knowledge to be had towards proving that they did OR didnt have anything to do with her death in a direct fashion

And no amount of repeatedly making the same innacurately re-iterated quotations will actually make anything you say either gramatically or factually acurate despite what you might mistakenly think

[Author]

Posts