[Cas]

@Tory Girl wrote:

@cas wrote:

My only concern however is, how will this affect Taxi companies ? Will drivers have to carry booster seats to allow themselves to be in complaince with these laws ? If so how many booster seats do they carry, and who will be held responsible for the failure to carry out these laws ?

I asked a freind about this one Doflip, he works as a controller in a cab office. He said, yes. they are supposed to comply with the law with regard to the child seats, but, there are 3 different sizes, from infant to the junior booster seats. Do they/should they, have to supply and carry all three??

I’d have said that probably it’d be easier, for families getting a taxi, to supply thier own, already owned, car seats and/or boosters. Either that, or if theyre going to a special occasion, their reason for getting a cab in the first place, that one parent refrain from drinking alchohol in order to drive home safely. It happens the world over.

If they are going to be licensed and responsible for carrying peoples children then they should be equipped to carry out their role as a Taxi to the full and carry the seats in the boot of their taxi’s. The seats aren’t small, and it would mean a family of 2 or more children wishing to go out for the day taking booster seats, it wouldnt be very practical.
The seats are heavy enough to move around.

Perhaps they cant afford a car so would have to rely on taxi’s or cant drive or simply dont have the money.

If they have to carry these seats in the boot all the time, where then, would they put peoples shopping when picking up from supermarkets, luggage from airports etc etc., It’s not as simple as it sounds.

[Cas]

@Tory Girl wrote:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=P1Y5FAHDZ1XN1QFIQMFSFGGAVCBQ0IV0?xml=/news/2006/08/05/nprescott05.xml

The very bottom part of this article made me laugh!!

Miss Major said: “My advice to any woman is that if they look like John Prescott, leave them well alone.” :lol:

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Any woman who dates a John Prescott lookalike must b e pretty desperate in the first place. :roll:

Alsoooooo

ANY woman, who hands over money to someone they barely know, needs locking up for their own safety……………stupid mares :lol:

[Cas]

My only concern however is, how will this affect Taxi companies ? Will drivers have to carry booster seats to allow themselves to be in complaince with these laws ? If so how many booster seats do they carry, and who will be held responsible for the failure to carry out these laws ?

I asked a freind about this one Doflip, he works as a controller in a cab office. He said, yes. they are supposed to comply with the law with regard to the child seats, but, there are 3 different sizes, from infant to the junior booster seats. Do they/should they, have to supply and carry all three??

I’d have said that probably it’d be easier, for families getting a taxi, to supply thier own, already owned, car seats and/or boosters. Either that, or if theyre going to a special occasion, their reason for getting a cab in the first place, that one parent refrain from drinking alchohol in order to drive home safely. It happens the world over.

[Cas]

@tommy ToXen wrote:

All I can say is the lot of you are sick.

And you will all burn in hell for your crimes.

I think maybe you should be the one to burn in hell Tom, for sexualising such a natural act. I agree with everyone else on here that have said it’s the most natural thing in the world, and that people like yourself who see a problem in it, therefore sexualising it, are the ones with the real problem.

I cant remeber who now, but someone mentiioned something about the Daily Star, and the amount of almost bare a@ses omitting from it’s front cover. I don’t suppose any of you narrow minded males find a problem with that, no, your more likely to be found drooling over those images :roll:

[Cas]

@Magoo wrote:

I don’t think you’ve read the thread, I have not stated what I believe to be right. I and Cas and a couple of others however have been mocked and belittled for our beliefs from someone that refuses to even look at anything that may be to the contrary. Instead he bases his argument on what he is told by the US Govt., his prerogative, I just see no point in arguing with someone with tunnel vision.

And MrB yet again you mock. I have not once said I believe about Roswell, but you are after soundbites. You live with it matey.

He can mock all he likes ………………. he’s entitled to his opinion and i’m entitled to mine, he’s not going to change my mind, no matter what kind of evidence he comes up with.

And…………………………..anyone who’s anyone knows, that Lee Harvey Oswald,. DIDN’T shoot JFK……………..if he had, it would have meant that he would have had to have been in two or three places all at once………………..why the hell does he think he was shot!! such a high profile case!! purleeeeeeeeese, no one would have been able to have gotten to him if it had really been him alone, responsible for the death of JFK, but it wasn’t. was it :wink:

[Cas]

We are all going to hell in a handcart !!!

Oh I do hope so Drivel. Sounds like much more fun……………..bit like my ride round a pub car park on sunday afternoon in a shopping trolley!!!!

[Cas]

i’m nol a superiority freak Pikey. I simply have an opinion, if others don’t agree with it then it’s fine, I don’t have a problem with it, but in the meantime, i’ll still put my opinion across as will anyone else here…….not because i’m agreeing or dis- agreeing with Geoff, but because they’re my opinions! if someone can prove me wrong, then i’m more than happy to listen to thier argument.

[Cas]

@pikey wrote:

The Pentagon strike.

Debunking 911 myths.

Perhaps you’d care to open your mind.

We each see what we see. we each think what we think……….we also disagree, so who’s wrong and who’s right??? The only people with answers to those questiones are those who’s authority would never be questioned in the first place.

So………………..as like the death of princess diana, your normal day to day joe, will never know the whole truth ……………. thats life

[Cas]

@Mr Bigstuff wrote:

Well yes people who believe that september 11 wasn’t carried out by al qaeda do deserve to be put in the loony bin. Al Qaeda claimed responsibility for the attack, the hijackers were members of al qaeda, there were telephone calls from people onboard the flights to their loved ones telling them about the hijack, there are passenger lists for the flights. We have footage of the planes hitting the WTC and Pentagon. What more proof do you want?

All these half-baked theories by self-proclaimed experts about a conspiracy are about as credible as the Loch Ness monster story.

Im sorry first of all that i’m sort of coming into this only now n then, but I don’t have a pc at home at the moment, and it’s only when I go to my sons and use his, I can input again. Oo(thank fcuk for that I hear some whisper) hehe.

And Geoff………..I laughed my a@se off at your post on Monday, well said that man :lol: :roll:

Anyway back to the topic.

I never at any time Mr B, said that aircraft didn’t!! hit the WTC’s, they did, millions of people saw that on the hundreds of news bulletins throughout the day. People also saw, or at least think they did, an aircraft hitting the pentagon………don’t take my word for it Mr B, go look on the site, watch it and listen, there is crystal clear evidence, that whatever hit the pentagon, it wasn’t a plane. Open your mind as Geoff said, what do you have to lose.

I’m no self proclaimed expert Mr B, i’m just someone who doesn’t always take what’s said to me without sometimes questioning it………..nothings ever just black and white.

[Cas]

@Mr Bigstuff wrote:

It’s hard not be flippant when faced with such a ridiculous idea. So now you’re saying that the WhiteHouse created a phantom flight with phantom passengers so that they could say a plane hit the Pentagon. So now the air traffic controllers must be in on the conspiracy too. Don’t you think air traffic control would be able to tell if there was any plane or not? Wouldn’t they have said something already if there was no plane? I’m sure that you would be able to get the full list of people who died aboard the flight that hit the Pentagon with a quick web search.

The idea of a conspiracy is just nonsense.

Actually, no, you can’t. Whatever you might think of them, people have asked, and have had no answers.

Do you really think it would have been so hard for the combined forces of the US to pull this off then, I didn’t, not until I saw this, it certainly makes you think. The question still remaines unanswered though doesn’t it………No engines were found, it was proven that yes, at a certain degree of heat, they would dis-integrate. There wasn’t sufficient heat to dis-integrate the engines, that WAS proven.

Have you watched it? and if not, are you going to?

[Author]

Posts