Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
This thread is still going nowhere.
It isn’t intended to. The purpose of this thread (as I have repeatedly stated) is to present hard evidence that there is still abuse on Just Chat and that the guides will take no action against it.
This disproves the narative that guests were banned so that there would not be abuse.
What you fail to understand is that JC is much like a bar, with the guides as bouncers. They can eject paying customers and institute their own policy enforcement, whether you like it or not. You can’t say the N word here, but you CAN make any other racial slur you like. But a chat room, like any other privately-held enterprise, is not a government-run organization that must comport to YOUR values because your taxes fund it.
I couldn’t disagree more, this is complete nonsense.
There is a moral (and legal) obligation to provide a service as it is advertised, this is especially so now that it is a paid service. Part of this service is the rules that are publicly visible on the site, which must be enforced as stated.
Private or public ownership has no bearing on this, and I don’t understand why you brought it up even.
I go to a barbershop where the old man forbids swearing. If someone swears and I call the old man on it and demand that he throws them out, he will disregard me, just as your concerns are being disregarded.
That would not be acceptable, as I previously stated the barber has a moral obligation to deliver his service as advertised (no swearing).
Even if for some reason you didn’t think that morality or principals are important (which you apparently don’t), the barber forbidding swearing would be counted as a verbal contract of sale under UK law (see 1893 Sales of Goods act, and the 2015 consumer rights act, ect), and would be liable to fines and even imprisonment.
1 member liked this post.
I am flummoxed as to why the point Drac has been repeatedly making is so difficult to comprehend for some people.
Because they have already determined that I am wrong before reading the content of my post.
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by
draculina. Reason: Ignorance is strength!
claiming my point was unclear is dishonest. You know what I’m trying to say.
Not really, no.
Stop being a hypocrite. You DON’T want uniform enforcement of rules or you would be more careful in your remarks. You want it one way for you, and another way for others.
Well, that’s news to me.
Thanks for telling me what I want.
I have no interest in your lectures on sexuality, or gender, or phobia.
What lecture?
Why unban whizz and not others? Because some were banned that I am glad to see gone.
“It’s okay when it happens to the bad people”
Yes, I see now why i’m a hypocrite with double standards.
I don’t really understand what you are trying to say Puds, but I will try to address you.
YOUR statement, “effeminate men are worse then women,” clearly indicates that you think it’s acceptable to hetero bash while you accuse others of homophobia. Would it be acceptable in Drac World to say “gay men are worse than women?” Is it acceptable in Drac World to say “masculine men are better than women?” Why do you think you can denigrate women and effeminate men? Is it because they don’t match YOUR preconceived notions of gender roles?
Why are you conflating sexuality and personality? I never said anything about gay men, or gender roles even.
I think this speaks to your own prejudices against gay men rather than anything.
The problem with YOUR double standard is that YOU demand special treatment from others while remaining unwilling to adhere to YOUR OWN demands.
That is the exact oposite of what I am “demanding”. I am asking for the rules to be enforced uniformly.
Either all abuse is banned, or none is.
if you demand to be free from offense, don’t make the same type of sweeping statements about other groups that get your panties in a wad if others make them. A little self-realization would help you and others greatly here. Otherwise, you will increasingly become the hyper-sensitive hypocrite that was previously known to us as Badder.
If ALL guests have to be banned so that certain people are not abused, then yes I expect any registered user that abuses me should also be banned under this precisdent.
Either stop whining or stop talking trash. You can’t continue to do both and call yourself a victim of abuse.
Are you suggesting that the examples of abuse I have posted are fake?
I would be better focused on UNBANNING WHIZZ.
Why specifically Whizz, and not everyone who was banned?
1 member liked this post.
To be fair to Drac though, she is arguing exactly that point, not the other way.
Reality doesn’t matter, only emotion.
Drac is evil.
Seems that I was sent more abusive PMs after I signed out.
Did you collect your sexist remark as evidence of a double standard, Drac?
I don’t recall making one, what did I say?
But yes, if I said something like that and i haven’t been banned then it would be evidence.
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by draculina.
i think i have mentioned this before draculina….most of the chatter’s that were being abused are now contacting the police direct via email This is a police matter now
1 member liked this post.
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 4 months ago by
