Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
7 June, 2008 at 11:49 pm #323000
@forumhostpb wrote:
Personally I think he should fire the bloody lot.[/b][/color]
I think alan would if it weren’t on tv.
Seen Tre on the weakest link earlier, still the same eager to win approach and getting excited at the prospect. 4th aint bad.
7 June, 2008 at 2:10 pm #322995@emmalush wrote:
Ive got a feeling Lucinder will flourish in the interviews
Well, she did better than most, what let her down was telling the others she didn’t feel she could win, IN FRONT OF THE CAMERAS…
She was the weakest link generally, and alan certainly had knives with her name on.
I think alan ultimately thinks its between Lee and Claire, but he doesn’t believe Lee could do a great job in organising what the finalists did in previous years, the glamour set-up, it would make a mockery of the programme.
So, putting them together must surely mean they do well, be winners and he picks from them.
So wouldn’t it be great if the other 2 won the final pitch.
7 June, 2008 at 2:00 pm #343085@talon wrote:
Emms, I see you’ve still got the same big chip on your shoulder. Some things just don’t change at all! [-X
Eh? or as Manuel in Falwty Towers says, Ce? Meaning?
6 June, 2008 at 3:19 pm #336242@Man in Beds wrote:
Great, blame the Government and/or the educational system now for all the abortions.
I know it can be difficult to accept blame but we can’t always point the finger or rely at others. Sex education, just like any other education, starts at home.Partly, don’t you remember the labour headline, education, education, education?
Ultimately, people should take full responsibility for their actions. I wouldn’t have a welfare state for children in terms of feeding & clothing them, if you can’t afford to bring a child into the world, DON’T HAVE ONE. I don’t see why others should have to fund them.
Its bad policy, because hyperthectically, their could be a baby boom too many, no good for society, just like asylum seekers.
6 June, 2008 at 1:07 am #336240@anita Gofradump wrote:
As for the actual topic, If women silly enough to open ya legs without taking precautions, you shouldnt be allowed to abort. Or should learn to swallow.
Now that i partly agree with.
Personal freedom comes with personal responsibility. If we had an education system to be proud of, there wouldn’t be many abortions.
Were all too wishy washy leafy lay the blame anywhere and everywhere else society.
Great 11 years under New Labour
But will the public learn from it??
6 June, 2008 at 1:01 am #336239@cymorill wrote:
The problem is, we voted in a government that forced us into the human rights laws. So will you be voting against new labour, blue labour, lib dems and greens? ..
If we didnt have the human rights we were “forced into”, then people, like yourself, wouldnt be allowed to spew the complete and utter bol.locks they class as opinions with so much regularity. People would still be slaves, women would not be allowed to open their mouths in public, and children would still be shoved up rich people’s chimneys to clean em.
So yep lets do away with Human Rights, and go back to living in the dark ages when life was soooo much better.
:shock: :lol: Is there a full moon again…what year did the human rights law start?
No wonder were in the Brown stuff. Idiots like you are SOOO easily sold with gimmicks like “human rights law” or “global warming” etc etc. Is it your human right to drive a chelsea tractor :lol:
All we need is common sense law, it covers everything and everyone, equally.
6 June, 2008 at 12:48 am #342939@anita Gofradump wrote:
I wish someone would marry you and give you a good fcking, you might chill out a bit then :lol:
Does that mean you’re fukt :wink:
6 June, 2008 at 12:46 am #3396663 June, 2008 at 1:50 pm #336234@American Woman wrote:
1. But I don’t think they should get access to little luxuries like computers, video games, work out equipment, etc. That is what I have issues with.
2. You’d never be able to fathom how much my loved ones mean to me so I’m not going to dignify your statement
3. I don’t plan on living the rest of my life like you live yours. non-forgiveness, revenge, murder at your convenience.
1. Agreed. The problem is, we voted in a government that forced us into the human rights laws. So will you be voting against new labour, blue labour, lib dems and greens?
2. they mean SOOOO much to you, that being a victim to an horrific crime is equal to the criminal living in prison.
3. how can you forgive someone who breaks your armys and legs, blinds you and rips your ears off?
Why do you like murdering people at your convenience?3 June, 2008 at 1:41 pm #336231@cymorill wrote:
I would rather have an “evil christian state” that has a modicum of basic morality, than live in a society where someone feels they should be allowed to do what the heck they want when they want, regardless of who it affects, because they desire “human freedom”.
What is it with idiots who don’t read what i say correctly, i didn’t say that.
I said we should have the human right & freedom to decide whats best for our own body.
Should you? Or should society decide? Are you capable of deciding? Society says no!
Christianity is a belief system based on Paganism.
The cross – Pagan.
Yule – Pagan.
“christmas” tree – Pagan.
Three Kings – Pagan.
God (astrology) – Pagan.
Mistletoe – pagan.
Christian rules – Common sense.Watch the 36 mins of this
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5547481422995115331&q=&hl=enWe don’t need christianity, all we need is common sense.
-
AuthorPosts