[emmalush]

Politics show sunday.

Tessa jowell “it must be pretty awful being john prescott this weekend”

I’ll say, infact i’ll go further and say lifetime :D

“dave” cameron explaining that he uses “my government car” to work and back.

Government david :?: :? Does he suffer from delusions of granduer? On ya bike :wink:

MATV (an asian tv company in Leicester)

At the festival ceromony for the vaisakhi celebrations, an asian community leader described “vaisakhi, eed and divali” as the reason for Leicester’s multicultural success.

Hmm, what about christmas, the african festival, Leicester’s three main sporting entertainments (football, cricket and rugby).

At this ceremony, the Leicester mayor spoke to a mass crowd of atleast 13, most of whom were sikh men in their 50’s…

This young enducing vibrancy is something to behold :roll:

Why are we fed this rubbish?

[emmalush]

@forumhostpb wrote:

Er….. Emma I don’t rreally think that you can fairly accuse Her Majesty’s Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs of being a ‘terrorist’.

Granted he may be a lot of things – but surely not a terrorist.

http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/terrorist?view=uk
“terrorist • noun a person who uses violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims”

Of course i can, hes used violence in iraq, and intimidation both here and iraq for political aim.

Its so easy to believe the same media spew that only those our government call terrorists, are terrorists because there apparently “on our side”.

[emmalush]

Doesnt say “get rid” does it slayer :roll:

And if people say no, it doesnt say force against their will.

[emmalush]

@Mr Bigstuff wrote:

As for a quote, I just told you I quoted Phil Edwards from his interview on the BBC with Jon Sopel.

You said its in the BNP manifesto, so show us or shut up.

[emmalush]

@rubyred wrote:

oh “criminals ” like tyndall you mean ??

Yeah lets punish a dead man :roll:

Seriously, are you the best searchlight can come up with to tackle me?

[emmalush]

@rubyred wrote:

not THIS time James,,,:) emmas earlier thread was stolen direct from the bnp website,,( as is HER habit) i happen to think Peter is a damm fine sensitive poetic,arty farty type !! YES he has a problem,,but that DONT make him a lesser person!!

Not stolen, educated by, and interpreted in my own way, its called individualism, which your political masters dont like you doing.

Its not my habitt, if that would be the case, i’d flood this website beyond its memory capabilities.

Im interested to know why you feel breaking the law is a good thing
“i happen to think Peter is a damm fine sensitive poetic,arty farty type !! YES he has a problem,,but that DONT make him a lesser person”.
In the eyes of the law, he is a lesser person, or atleast if implemented correctly it should mean that.

OR, should we just forget about punishing criminals?

[emmalush]

@Mr Bigstuff wrote:

1 All Germans were members of the nazi party???

Ok, some or most, that better for you.

2 Hating Hitler is a bad thing now?

Hating anyone is fascism, but atleast we can do that about some people, even those we talk to.

4 Jack Straw’s a terrorist?? WTF?

He believe’s in terrorising innocent millions in iraq.
He contradicts himself alot, calling bin laden and such like the same as what he is himself.
[/quote]

[emmalush]

@Mr Bigstuff wrote:

“Wants to get rid of minority groups” and “ideally would like to see 100% repatriation of minority groups” are 2 ways of saying exactly the same thing you bloody fool :lol: :roll:

Exactly the same thing? Only in your fourth dimensional world :D :P :arrow: :?: :P :lol: :o 8) :!:

Dare i ask, would you please, before the court room :wink: show us a link or even a quote which demonstrates the sentence you made?
“How can I prove that the BNP want to get rid of all ethnic minorities from the UK? Firstly it’s in your party’s manifesto”.

[emmalush]

@Mr Bigstuff wrote:

Emma, you say I have a miniscule brain yet you don’t understand how remarks from an interview can be taken out of context? You failed to mention in your post that Ted Cantle was the author of the report on the oldham riots and he was talking about all-white neighbourhoods in relation to the the spread of the far-right ideology and racial hatred in those areas. So, in that sense, you took his remarks out of context.

THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT WHAT TED SAID ABOUT THE OLDHAM RIOTS, OR WHETHER HIS PANTS ARE BLUE, IT IS ABOUT WHAT HE AND A LOCAL NEWS PRESENTER SAID ON MONDAY’S NEWS BULLETIN, ABOUT UNHEALTHILY WHITE AREAS ARE “LIKE” IN THE EAST MIDLANDS.

Slip out of the self infatuated skin shell your not seeing through properly, or create your own thread about his views of oldham’s riots.

[emmalush]

@Mr Bigstuff wrote:

Professor Ted Cantle wrote the report on the Oldham riots. I think you’ve taken his comments out of context. Read these quotes from The Times:

I have them on video, thats how i was able to write them down. If your miniscule brain still doesnt understand, GO ASK CENTRAL NEWS FOR A COPY!!

“Some of the neighbouring areas of Notts and Derbyshire do seem to be unhealthily all-white. There is some evidence to show they are hostile to black and ethnic minorities.”

Which is? And where is the anti-white hostility? You can understand now why white people feel they need protecting from idiots who run our society.

So rather than saying, out-of-the-blue, that some areas were “unhealthily all white” what he was actually saying was that the fact that some of those areas are sympathetic to the BNP and they are hostile to non-white people mean that the all-white nature of those places is unhealthy.

Your shifty little libertarian mind just cannot bare to think that your marxist ideology is failing before your very eyes, can you.

So rather than saying what you did, ask before assuming wrongly.

[Author]

Posts