I suspect it runs much deeper than just unscrupulous debt collectors, the obvious and most important implications are that what is purported to benefit the children, could in fact disadvantage them. This together with corporate interference with the judiciary and the setting up of a de-facto ‘courts of justice’ is something we all should reject. I believe this is the way things are being slanted as far as the family courts system is concerned, what are possibly administrative sittings now taking the place of courts of justice.
More worrying is the potential for targets being imposed on relevant social services to advance or even sustain their budgets, quite fankly, turning what should be a fundamental right for children into a money making corporate scam squeezed between profit margins.
As far as my own personal rebuttal of their demands, my liking the company has very little to do with it. I will have to wait and see what action is taken before planning my escape, :wink: the ball is in their court so to speak. Anyway, there’s rumours that it’s the new atkins diet. :lol: