Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
And I thought my finger was on the pulse :lol:
CashCow :lol:
You might as well test the wreckage for existence of Care Bears.
Now there’s a plan ~ Where’s that wreckage ? . . . . Woopz it was criminally destroyed, oh well – we can always waterboard bush and get some answers. :lol:
@themaster wrote:
@gazlan wrote:
Show me the official explanation for the finding of Thermite in the remianing dust particles.
Thermite? What thermite? Come on, this is too easy!
The correct reply of course, is that the official investigation failed to even test for the use of high explosives.
Hi ! :lol:
A whole chicken
Show me the official explanation for the finding of Thermite in the remianing dust particles.
Oh, there’s no struggle, I assure you. Just would hate to think that any sane people may be swayed by the damaging and hurtful accusations of the ‘people’ behind these outlandish and utterly barmy lies.
But if they’re intelligent, I’m sure they’ll just see it for what it is. Bull.
The good old bbc strikes again. :lol:
What is it you require proof of specifically? List it here now.
To get people to think and re-think is hardly being mis-informed!
What part of the above do you struggle with ?
Caring enough to have an opinion is the first hirdle :lol:
You appear to think that one group of people be believed over another. Equally there are hundreds and now as likely thousands of academics etc challenging the ‘evidence’ put forward.
All moot of course being that the US Government acted against their own laws in having crucial crime scene evidence removed and destroyed.
It is plain to see that there were explosions in various parts of the buildings, some say before including Rodriguez and another ~ Sanchez who also maintained the building. The statements of various first responders also tell it that way.Of course, if the Government were in cahoots with A.N Other in creating this tragedy, they have in effect carried out one of the most heinous of crimes against it’s own people and as likely will get away with it.
In the greater scheme and without independent research and investigative authority, I would suggest that we have all been or could be mis-guided. Your claim of me being mis-informed is a non-sense as well you know it as either argument can be definitively ‘debunked’ and conjecture will never win an argument.
Best we concentrate on the facts, and the facts detail many anomalies, each with their own set of ‘professionals’ both for and against. To get people to think and re-think is hardly being mis-informed! So in effect, will be considered thus
