[Morgan.]

Morgan. wrote:

If it’s Liverpool fans who are the worst offenders, (Heysel) then you single them out for extra punishment to the others to set an example, right?

Ge wrote:

Coming from the “single them out to set an example”.

How you infer I don’t know about the Lammy report from that, I will never know.

Was it wrong to single out Liverpool fans for extra punishment as they were the worst offenders, and an example had to be set ? I really don’t know myself. I was raising it in a thought provoking way rather than a concrete steadfast personal opinion.

Try reading me twice x

[Morgan.]

Segregation.

Racial segregation is the separation of people into racial or other ethnic groups in daily life. It may apply to activities such as eating in a restaurant, drinking from a water fountain, using a public toilet, attending school, going to the movies, riding on a bus, or in the rental or purchase of a home<sup id=”cite_ref-1″ class=”reference”>[1]</sup> or of hotel rooms.

and of course being treated differently in the legal system.

 

[Morgan.]

Ge wrote:

What is it you don’t understand that while socio-economic status is relevant in criminality, it is NOT a factor in the inherantly biased British Justice System which is disproprtionally imprisoning young men from black and ethnic minority backgrounds compared to their white peers.

What is it that you don’t understand that I am not contesting any of that, and in full agreement with every word of?

[Morgan.]

Ge wrote:

if your black your more likely to be sent to prison, because your black and not because of the crime you commited.

This relates back to Trevor Phillips and his warning of “Britain’s current approach to multiculturalism could cause Britain to “sleepwalk towards segregation”

If it’s Liverpool fans who are the worst offenders, (Heysel) then you single them out for extra punishment to the others to set an example, right?

[Morgan.]

Ge wrote:

if your black your more

you’re* x2

Syntax. Blossom makes that same mistake.

[Morgan.]

Ge wrote:

and disregard full indepth research released last year

I think you’re jumping the gun a little bit there. Why do you assume I haven’t read it ten times over? Why do you think I am disregarding it? Simply because I don’t mention it?

Why do you assume if you know about it and it’s implications that I don’t?

• This reply was modified 7 years, 1 month ago by  Morgan..

[Morgan.]

Ge wrote:

It is cearly possible to understand hence the Lammy review of which I have just posted the relevant links

Does Lammy in the report refer to an “underclass of black youth” ?

[Morgan.]

Ge wrote:

Not some random line a politician uttered 13 years ago

It’s hardly some random line, it’s quite a profound statement made by the Chairman of the Equality and Rights comission, covering a very sensitive area of British society.

More importantly and relevantly, it seems Mr Phillips’ statements have proved to be true.

[Morgan.]

Ge wrote:

Not some random line a politician uttered 13 years ago

Since when has Trevor been a politician?

[Morgan.]

I think it’s IMPOSSIBLE to understand the reasons behind the facts provided regarding blacks and crime and prison, if one is oblivious to there being an “underclass of black youth”

 

[Author]

Posts