Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Preservation of Life is more important than loss of life. Preservation of life is a success.
if preservation of life was more important than loss of life 1 we wouldn’t have helped create a nuclear bomb 2 we wouldn’t sell weapons to other countries 3 we wouldn’t have biological weapons 4 we wouldn’t fight other countries wars in the interest of the rich 5 we would solve our own countries problems before trying to solve other countries
I ask you this, right now what is the more important for you, to preserve your life, or to lose it?
Would you rather keep something or lose it ?
Talking ’bout
I think you’re missing the point. Weapons are Not the issue. Weapons don’t kill, people do.
A rolled up newspaper is a weapon.
A million pistols wont kill anybody without a finger to pull the trigger.
How many people have died from nuclear bombs?
How many lives have been preserved by nuclear bombs?
Mine certainly has.
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by
Morgan..
1 member liked this post.
if preservation of life was more important than loss of life 1 we wouldn’t have helped create a nuclear bomb
why? the nuclear deterrent has arguably preserved life on earth for 70 years. Your country the UK hasn’t gone to a major war for 80 years because it has the nuclear weapons, same for our neighbours and brothers in France.
2 we wouldn’t sell weapons to other countries
why? weapons preserve life.
3 we wouldn’t have biological weapons
we? UK ? do we have them? or moreso, when did we last use them? again. All weapons can preserve life, even (especially) the ugly and brutal weapons.
4 we wouldn’t fight other countries wars in the interest of the rich
We would, depending on who it was. We could be obliged to as a NATO member. I’m sure we wouldn’t stand by and watch one of our smaller historic neighbours getting destroyed. Ireland, Iceland, Norway, Belgium, Holland etc
5 we would solve our own countries problems before trying to solve other countries
Capital gain is more important than trying to solve problems that may be currently unsolvable. It could make sense to make money first, to pay for the knowledge / expertise to help you solve the problem.
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by Morgan..
the loss of any life is not a success
Had Hitler been assasinated in 1936, that loss of life would have been a success
the dropping of bombs is not a success
All bombs dropped that will Preserve life are a success.
war itself is not a success who ever wins
The victors of wars might tell you different. Have you ever lived through a war?
and 2 countries the uk and the usa who are demonising immigrants certainly have no right in creating more of them
All countries demonise immigrants. Some more than others. Have a look at the Iranian, Saudi or Hungarian press. I don’t think we’ve declared War on anybody for quite a while.
Bombs are good aren’t they? Our Loving and caring God would never give us bombs if they were bad for us x
I’m awfully sorry, I will have to warn you, I may not be able to “chat in real time” with you for long. I cant sit staring at my JC screen all day, refreshing every minute.
I chat in my time, not yours x
Have a lovely day x
I’m pleased you have power and knowledge
😍
Things ain’t always what they seem x
Please note* We are now debating in real time. I answered in 5 mins
Ge you took 6 mins to answer with your last response, can you type quicker, and refresh your page more often please.
Ok, I think I understand this term now.
It means, there is no other plausible explanation than “googling” if any post isn’t answered within 5 mins.
The clock is running, you’ve got 5 mins to respond to this (to be within the real time limits) or you must be googling.
⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by
