Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
The “raids” that targeted 3 sites suspected of involvement with chemical weapons? Or the “five missiles” the UK fired at those sites? Try aiming those missiles at Russian bases and see what happens then.
No, I mean every fighter jet that isn’t Syrian or Russian and has entered Syrian airspace. Israel and Turkey have infringed Syrian airspace more than NATO
China will NOT side with America and risk being targeted by superior Russian nuke technology.
China is more scared of USA than Russia.
China will put itself first, and side with who it thinks will win. NATO will win any fight on Earth, so that’s who China will side with x
Why would China join the UK and America in the event of a nuclear war
Because they would win.
If you cant beat them join them x
Meanwhile in the real world no one is going to seriously mess with Russia militarily
Trump told Putin, “We’re coming in at 02.00 hours, keep your Jets out of the sky.”
Trump did NOT ask Putin, “Please may I come in at 2:00 hours and drop a few bombs, I promise not to hit you xxx”
I’d say that was “messing” with Russia
No it doesn’t and with America bombed into the ice age China would become the number 1 global superpower. Similar to how America achieved that goal after two world wars.
To compare a Nuclear Holocaust of WW3, to WW1 &2 a century previous, is a little naive x
with America bombed into the ice age China would become the number 1 global superpower
No it wouldn’t. If we lived in a world with no America, there would also be no China either.
You talk about Russia like it is the Iraqi regime, or the Libyan regime, to be taken at will as and when the UK and our allies feel like it. If you poke the Russian ‘bear’ don’t be surprised when it turns round and bites you.
No one is doubting Russia’s status as a heavyweight. It seems it’s not the champion heavyweight, and it’s certainly not the only heavyweight. We expect all heavyweights to pack a punch.
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by
Morgan..
I have absolutely no idea where you assume India and China will side with the UK. Have you got a source for that?
It’s not about siding, it’s about Chain reaction, and Self preservation. China and India are close to Russia geographically. It might, in the Global picture be more effective for China or India to do the deed.
For example, let’s say Putin phones Theresa to tell her he’s going to nuke France. A great big bomb from Russia landing in France would affect London. In an absurd way, it would be better for UK to do the deed instead with small quicker bombs from south England, maybe preserving their own capital city if done surgically and close.
Of course this example is unrealistic and absurd, in today’s climate, but it’s an example of Chain reaction.
The next generation Russian stealth fighters,
Does evolution only apply to Russia? What about the next generation of NATO jets?
Its clear our top jets are better than the Russian, why should that dynamic suddenly change from a country with a smaller GDP than Italy? (Thanks Drac x)
-
This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by
