Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@jen_jen wrote:
I was hoping for a thought-provoking thread, I was disappointed.
And I look at all new threads, regardless of title…maybe next time I’ll be more selective and look at who started the thread first…
Hehe!
@jen_jen wrote:
Sad, very sad…
Agreed.
For J_in_Trance:
“Red red wine you make me feel so fine
You keep me rocking all of the time
Red red wine you make me feel so grand
I feel a million dollars when your just in my hand”@j_in_france wrote:
Just thought I would see how many views this topic got
Will you be excluding the number of times you click on it to boost your view count?
@j_in_france wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@jen_jen wrote:
I love it when the reasons that you start a thread are completely missed… :roll:
I get your point. Cameron seems to think that paedophilia and homosexuality are inextricably linked.
They are not, of course.
Does he?
Why don’t you read the opening post of this thread before you post your inane comments?
@jen_jen wrote:
I love it when the reasons that you start a thread are completely missed… :roll:
I get your point. Cameron seems to think that paedophilia and homosexuality are inextricably linked.
They are not, of course.
I shall make a donation.
Excellent idea.
I have no idea who they are.
@terry wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@tinks wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
The names are on the internet. They are therefore, in the public domain. I don’t see that Philip Schofield did anything wrong.
What this does highlight is that the internet is an uncontrollable beast and anyone can post anything whether it is fact or fiction.
That’s the real issue here for me, not Philip Schofield’s actions.
does arrogance give you the right to do what you want and how you want to do it?
I didn’t see the interview but I could set a website up right now and accuse anyone famous of anything. Who can stop me? By the time the site is ordered to be taken down it would have gone viral and the damage would already have been done to people’s reputations.
As I said, the internet is uncontrollable.
Schofield did it live on tv, that’s the difference.
Do more people watch live TV than use the internet?
I don’t know but they are both media outputs and the list appearing on one media does not mean it cannot appear on another.
@tinks wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
The names are on the internet. They are therefore, in the public domain. I don’t see that Philip Schofield did anything wrong.
What this does highlight is that the internet is an uncontrollable beast and anyone can post anything whether it is fact or fiction.
That’s the real issue here for me, not Philip Schofield’s actions.
does arrogance give you the right to do what you want and how you want to do it?
I didn’t see the interview but I could set a website up right now and accuse anyone famous of anything. Who can stop me? By the time the site is ordered to be taken down it would have gone viral and the damage would already have been done to people’s reputations.
As I said, the internet is uncontrollable.
@terry wrote:
@danny2011 wrote:
if u need it explaining terry shame on u 4 not even knowing what happened that day
Tell me what happened on November 11, 2011
Now you’re just being facetious.
