Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
23 February, 2006 at 3:22 pm #199008
Robbo, you are even thicker than I took you for. You can tell me a 4th time and a 5th time ad infinitum. Effectively what you have done is to make a feeble pretense of not baiting anyone, then go on to admit you were baiting someone, then suggest I took the bait, then claim others took the bait, completely ignoring the fact I told you that your were quite clearly baiting people by being inflamatory. When will the penny drop Robbo that being inflamatory is baiting people.
Like I said, you don’t think about what you type. If you want to go on patting yourself on the back for me or anyone else rising to your bait then go ahead. I’m not after any bait, I’m after the eejit on the end of the rod, not his bait. You’re like an angler casting his rod, line, hook, and bait, who snags the hook on the a r s e of his own trousers and yanks it harder cos he thinks he’s got a bite.
As words seem to be wasted on you ( even your own words ) then have a look at this pic………….this is how NOT to bait a hook Robbo, repeat NOT.
23 February, 2006 at 2:47 pm #199207I dropped an egg on the kitchen floor last week, which is usually a messy thing to clean up using a cloth, then I realised the dog would lap it up as every few weeks I give her a raw egg as a treat, so I called her in, and sure enough, she lapped it up and never left a drop. The floor was clean anyway, so I saw no harm in it.
23 February, 2006 at 2:39 pm #199006Robbo, anyone can make a post for the simple purpose of prompting replies, indeed, one can post something even using the title…..PLEASE DO NOT REPLY, and in that post you can stress and emphasise a hundred times that you don’t want any replies, you don’t need any replies, and you won’t read replies etc etc etc………….and you will GET replies. I posted something once and stated I didn’t require any reply to it as it was mainly to encourage people to visit another web-site and possibly volunteer for what I felt was a worthy cause, nevertheless, people did reply.
What I think you have failed to understand is that you contradicted yourself, and also that your post was bound to be perceived as inflamatory due to that contradiction.
I see no point in you congratulating yourself in achieving a result that was an inevitable consequence of your post, but if that makes you feel clever then I think you are more deserving of pity than scorn.
23 February, 2006 at 12:17 pm #199001Volksie, I like yer siggy. Would that be Al snorting a certain powdery substance in a very good movie in which he had a “leetle friend”?
23 February, 2006 at 12:00 pm #189307I think I only left once by saying that, and it was at the last one. I’m not throwing a childish tantrum. They don’t upset me. There was a thread on it, and I posted on it. I thought my posts were amusing, but as with anything, not everyone will agree, however, the thread was used to verbally abuse me, and I respond to that twice in my own way. The one that you’ve seen fit to respond to was posted in response to that abuse. I haven’t used the theme nights to abuse anyone, nor have I tried to spoil them or disrupt other peoples’ enjoyment of them. Even my comment before leaving the last one ( i.e. f..k this ) wasn’t intended as abuse or scorn at chatters or the theme night. It was said in the same vein as I’d say it if I’d popped into a boozer for a quiet pint and discovered there was a karaoke on.
I’ve came into the theme nights forgetting they were on, that’s the only reason I didn’t stay away.
I didn’t know it was you EJ who posted under the name dolflip, had I known that I would not have poured scorn on the whole theme thing when you first posted, as I would not wish to offend or upset you, others yes, but not you.
I won’t tell anyone to stick their theme nights up their a r s e s anymore, but I have to retain the right to say that in reponse to anything else that I consider appropriate.
I hope you and your loved ones are well ej. x
23 February, 2006 at 4:40 am #189304Ugo! What are you doing to me back there with yer hands?
23 February, 2006 at 4:07 am #197548Likes sex with goats
23 February, 2006 at 1:27 am #198995Sticks and stones will break my bones………..and names will always hurt me.
23 February, 2006 at 1:22 am #198993At least you have finally agreed that ruby is smart. I will consider that as an apology to her, to me, and to the entire Scottish nation as well as to all other JC users on this thread, and I thank you for it!
23 February, 2006 at 1:17 am #198989Yes, I have better things to do, but being an idiot I prefer doing this instead.
-
AuthorPosts