Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
24 May, 2007 at 4:49 pm #271113
You could always borrow my goat – he’s not fussy.
24 May, 2007 at 4:48 pm #271191@forumhostpb wrote:
@fastcars wrote:
@forumhostpb wrote:
Fastcars …. are you suggesting that some of these females are committing an offence under the Trade Descriptions Act???
To commit an offence under the Trade Discriptions Act they would need to be selling themselves or their bodies under the pretence that they look like their advertising slogans.
My god!!! You are not suggesting…… :shock: :shock: :shock:
Dear oh dear … that thought would never even cross my mind !!!
Maybe I should have referred to the Misrepresentation Act instead.
Tommy’s description of some of the JC females is perhaps a bit over the top.
Ok, ok. Their hair isn’t that greasy.
24 May, 2007 at 9:37 am #271111I never realized PB was this popular. Anyway, I think I put the poll options the wrong way around. Yes is supposed to be on the bottom with the most votes. Can someone fix it?
24 May, 2007 at 9:33 am #271183@forumhostpb wrote:
Fastcars …. are you suggesting that some of these females are committing an offence under the Trade Descriptions Act???
I believe they are, PB.
The JC females on the boards use signatures of rather nice females – when really they are big, obese, sweaty and they smell of crusty, cheesy feet – they are greasy hair and oozing-lard spots on their face.
That means they should have a signature that represents that.
Did I also mention that you could park an airbus inbetween their gammon flaps? You know what JC women are like.
22 May, 2007 at 12:26 pm #271338If it was up to me, I’d like to live in a big house in the countryside with no-one around for atleast 2 miles, with 200 sq yards of land surrounding me.
I don’t like people. Black, brown, yellow or white – they’re all burglars, rapists, paedophiles, murderers, robbers, muggers, thieves and liars.
22 May, 2007 at 12:24 pm #271148I see she hasn’t an explanation.
I win. o/
21 May, 2007 at 2:23 am #270011@ubermik wrote:
Silence is actually surprising, I said something pretty similar towards the beginning of this thread and was sniped at for being so “insensitive” lol
The thing is tho, as I also said, its a pavlovian response, people, sadly the majority are flea trained to jump when the media tells them to, they respond to the hype because socially they MIGHT be frowned upon if they dont, and even dissenters for the most part wait for someone else to vocalise disdain before uttering their paltry “me too”, never wanting to risk being the first incase the majority dont side with them
Its also to a degree people buying solace, self worth and justifying their existence
Knowing that such things now are so commonplace and that each person COULD put more effort, feel more and react more to each and every occurence or be more proactive, but they arent
So when theres a massively exagerated media farce like with this one they go overboard like that will make some imaginary balance equalise
Totally pathetic on so many levels, but also totally understandable and totally commonplace
Exactly, Uber. (Could an awkward, weary silence on the subject also be a sign that they actually aree – but are too afraid to agree publically? :wink: )
Why hasn’t Richard Branson given money towards finding other lost or kidnapped children?
Why hasn’t the generous Scottish businessman who offered a £1,000,000 for information on Maddie, also offered money for information leading to the prosecution of paedophiles and child rapists?
I think Maddie going missing is nothing more than a farce. It’s been hi-jacked by heartless pr*cks such as Richard Branson just to get a bit of publicity. What kind of an evil, savage tosser would use a kidnapped little year as publicity?
These people should be hanged.
20 May, 2007 at 11:38 pm #271043:wink: I hope you was warned BIG TIME.
I’m the biggest homosexual pervert up in this place. Ask PB & UK, they’ll confirm. I am the official JC gay.
And, because I’m the official JC gay, that means I get to bum one user per week of my choice.
20 May, 2007 at 11:30 pm #270008I posted this on my site – and, nobody really knew how to respond.. so.. I’m going to see if I get the same response here..
Now, don’t take my post wrong. I care a great deal about children, and I’m usually the first to call for kidnappers and such to be hanged.
But, why has Maddie got all this publicity, and all the other thousands of missing, kidnapped, beaten, raped & murdered children aren’t worth a shit?
Sure, it was nice of people to give money towards finding Maddie etc – but to me, they’re all hypocritical bastards. What about all the other missing, beaten, raped, kidnapped & murdered children?
Why doesn’t anybody care about all those? Why only this one child? What makes this one child more important and special than all the other missing children?
Why doesn’t the press & the police put as much effort into finding all the other children?
20 May, 2007 at 11:21 pm #271156@fastcars wrote:
…… do the eeerrrmmmmm “larger” female users of this site use wafer thin, sexy, scantily dressed ladies in their signature pictures… :?: :?
Cos if they had ladies in their signatures that represented how … errrrrmmmmmm.. “larger”… they are in real life, their signature would be too large and be rejected, or deleted :)
Hope this answers your reasonable question, Fastcars.
-
AuthorPosts