[ubermik]

Well a hell of a lot of stalking is a figment of the “victims” imagination for a start

But the term stalking is being manipulated to be socially seen as a word to describe “what men do” similar to the way other words are being redefined via the media and academia when in reality stalking used to be commonly done and still is by women, often a dumped and bitter ex but the term isnt so commonly applied to women anymore even when what they are doing is quite clearly stalking and the more whimsical understated term of “bunny boiler” tends to be more common

As with many things we are being brainwashed into believing are suddenly magically of pandemic proportions its always been around but nobody has really made much of a fuss about it, but with the current fempandering social climate its become a new political and social hot potato and buzz word

[ubermik]

Oh yeah, and every time compulsory paternity testing at birth has been forwarded towards becoming legislation the only group to oppose it on every single occasion (8 at last count as far as I’m aware) have been feminist lobbyists

As theres no real reason NOT to do it that would seem to suggest they want to maintain the status quo so that an undefineable amount of women can continue to take years of someones life and paypacket from them on the basis of a lie

And yet I bet there will be less of an outcry from the same lobbyist groups about the proposed compulsory aids tests even tho there isnt a single reliable test to show someone even has aids, nobody has ever been able to actually find the aids virus, there has never been one single proven case of aids being transmitted to another person as a virus AND the treatments for HIV are known to disfigure, retard and or kill foetuses as well as guaranteeing a total shutdown of the persons immune system thus causing them to then be diagnosed as having full blown aids

Yet hardly a murmur of dissaproval lol, yet mention paternity fraud and feminists start stamping their hobnail boots in protest :D:D

Funny that :)

[ubermik]

Paternity fraud is the name given to someone knowingly misleading someone about them being the father of a child, the term is usually used when that leads to or is part of the reason the couple stay together and often results in the person not finding out they arent and werent the father till a decade or two later

Aside from the obvious financial fraud thats taken place many will have totally altered their plans and life, not gone to college or uni, not travelled, not done the job they REALLY wanted in lieu of a more predictable or better paid one etc etc

Its also the case that by the time the person does find out its often too late for them to father a child of their own which for many is a desire whether others agree with or understand the importance of it

A simple defrauding of a little old lady out of£10,000 with little to no other inconvenience can land someone in jail

But defraud someone out of severeal hundreds of thousands of pounds raising a child that isnt theirs and nobody bats an eyelid

Someone being deprived of their freedom or ability to choose their path in life due to an injury or some form of false imprisonment carries with it a very substantial compensation scale

Deprive someone of the same amount of years of freedom to choose by telling them someone elses child is theirs and nobody bats an eyelid

Thats paternity fraud, and local experimental checks in various schools around the country have found that as many as 1 in 4 kids in some areas couldnt possibly have been fathered by the person they are being told is their father, but on the basis of the pilot scheme the government decided not to go ahead with a national screening program for fear it might weaken the already crumbling tradition of marriage and families

[ubermik]

On the flip side tho, if the government employed loads more litter collectors the effect on the economy would be immense and litterers would be making an active contribution to the economy :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[ubermik]

Actually, I just noticed the word “empowerment” was mentioned

One of the conveniently avoided areas of that topic relating to this is the “empowerment” many women get from dressing in what they KNOW is an overtly sexually attractive manner (if they dont know that then they are retarded and shouldnt be allowed out in public unescorted)

Not only empowerment from the mere knowledge of being visually appealing and alluring to a large percentage of men, but empowerment from (in their eyes) being MORE alluring than other women

So the point although often passed off as “feeling good” has its roots either consciously or for some subconciously in being visually sexually appealing, NOT “just” looking good, as showing a maximum amount of bare skin is really stretching the credibility of that claim lol

But its looking good in a visually appealing way and not in the nice trouser suit and well matched blouse and shoes kind of “looking good”

Trying to claim having skirts that are so short they show arse often only clad in a thong is “just looking nice” and isnt sexually driven is just delusion, as is having your tits practically out in the wild

On top of the sexual power and empowerment that sort of look gives by attracting attention they can CHOOSE to accept or not accept theres also the empowerment over other women, which for many women is more important than attraction to men. The satisfaction of feeling you are more noticed than other women trying equally as hard (although claiming not to be) as you are (whilst not actually REALLY doing that lol)

The problem as mentioned earlier is that dressing in a known sexually advertising manner will indiscriminately attract attention rather than selectively, SOME of those people MIGHT be mentally ill or a rapist which isnt known, one of them COULD see someones attire as “wanting it” and follow them out of the club

And this is where the real issue of personal responsibility comes into play, they COULD have arranged to go home with friends, to be picked up, to take a taxi all of which in many instances of this specific form of assault or rape avoided it happening

Thats THEIR choice, thats them taking some personal responsibility for their own safety, thats them showing some common sense and awareness of their surroundings

If however they CHOOSE to walk home alone half pissed and get raped they CANT as far as I am concerned claim to be unblameable

That blame tho doesnt in anyway lessen the rapists blame, thats their own personal blame for their own stupid choices and for putting themselves in a needlessly risky situation because they were too stupid or too drunk (still too stupid for getting so drunk) to have been more responsible

The woman in that situation didnt force the rapist to rape her, but similarly the rapist didnt force her to offer herself up as a victim

If I were to walk blindfolded back and forth across a road till I got run over I wouldnt expect people to blame the motorist, even if the motorist was drunk it doesnt remove MY responsibility for doing something so bloody stupid to begin with

And in the same way in that situation, the motorist would be TOTALLY to blame for being drunk but I would also be totally to blame for being so retarded that I thought it was ok to walk back and forth blindfolded across a road till I got run over

Niether blame lessens the other, both are for each individuals personal stupidity

[ubermik]

Then point that rather large copy/paste where a link would have sufficed was missing is that people dont jusrt randomly form assumptions out of thin air

Women who ARE out pole hoping wont as a rule dress in quaker style clothing, they WONT as a rule act all prim and proper and follow ladylike ettiquette in the hopes some blokey will pay their slime chute some attention

This is known by BOTH genders

So either women who arent on the prowl for a good pole bounce could bear it in mind when deciding what signals to give out and what to wear or perhaps a march to force women who DO have a voracious and overt sexual apetite to abstain indefinitely should be held as well?

Also, maybe a march to make hookers NOT dress like “modern fashions” would be appropriate as that is another subconcious link appertaining to womens clothing

Maybe women should complain about being “forced” to wear prostitute styled clothes by designers would also be a good idea as they apparently claim to have no choice in the matter even tho countless other women seem to manage to avoid going out in something resembling a couple of belts and a bit of dental floss

Or maybe, just maybe they could stop trying to blame everyone except themselves for how people react to their clothes and behaviour and take respsonsibility for their own actions and choices instead? Radical I know, but you never know lol

As for drinking, if women as we are led to believe are totally and utterly innocent of ANYTHING they do when drunk and have no ability to give consent whatsoever then two points

1) surely that would also apply to the bloke they are with who would also in most cases be just as drunk if not more so?????

2) IF we are supposed to believe the feminist nonsensical farce that ONLY women arent to be blamed for what they do when drunk OR for actually getting drunk to begin with then perhaps the answer is to ban women from drinkiing alltogether and protect the poor lil dears from themselves?

A bit of consistency SOMEWHERE on this topic from the feminist uberriecht would be a nice change

[ubermik]

I personally think that a national DNA database is a fantastic idea that should already have been in place ages ago

Just having the DNA of every person born in this country alone would be enough of a deterrent to reduce or stop a hell of a lot of crime, it would totally remove the chances of the worst form of fraud in existence which is paternity fraud and would make murder and rape cleanup rates skyrocket to unbelievable statistics

Which begs the question of who wouldnt want one?

People who want to rape and murder? People who think its a womans right to be able to commit paternity fraud? People who want to have decent chances of getting away with any crime?

Every inncocent person is potentially a criminal that hasnt been caught yet, only the actual innocent people dont need to worry about this

[ubermik]

Well the thing is there IS a case to answer on the score

And the same idiots who try to claim it has nothing to do with someone being raped will also try to claim women should be able to act as they want when they want, wear what they want without EVER having to consider the implications of it, should be able to walk home pissed and alone through a park at 3am without the need to worry and countless other nonsensical notions that put women retarded enough to be listening to those morons in grave danger

All of that would be “nice” in an ideal world, but its time these idiots woke up and realised we dont live in an “ideal” world we live in the real one, and what someone “should” be able to do is totally irrelevant really

Also, none of the phrases or statemens made are “condoning” rape, reducing the severity of it or are in anyway removing responsibility for commiting it from the rapist. Thats the idiotic nonsense used by post modern feminist brainwashed idiots who lack the capability for free thought or reason

When two people are involved in any situation there isnt 100% blame to be accorded, theres 200%, each person has their own share of 100% blame for their OWN actions

So the rapist is ALWAYS 100% to blame for what they do

But similarly a woman who walks pissed through a park at 3am alone is responsible for putting herself in THAT situation, not the rapist

A woman who is overtly flirtacious and suggestive with a complete stranger possibly giving them the idea they are up for some “fun” is responsible for their actions there too

Someone dressing as they KNOW many will consider has the look of an “up for it slut” is responsible for that two

As the rapist isnt in the slightest bit responsible for MAKING women choose to walk pissed through parks, or making them act like they are like a horn dog on heat to get a few free drinks or EVEN for selecting their wardrobe so they make a street corner hooker look prim and refined

Onkt tge woman herself is responsible for that, and if women are too thick to understand how what they do, wear and behave “could” influence the people they interact with either by giving out a wrong impression or soliciting unwanted levels and types of advances then they shouldnt be out in public till they mature a bit and develop some common sense

NOBODY is responsible for your personal safety but you, its time women started to pay some heed to that rather obvious fact

[ubermik]

I personally think this prison SHOULD be scrutinised with a fine tooth comb and all the problems with it fixed instantly

Firstly its STILL too luxurious and still costs way too much per prisoner per annum

We should be looking into ways of making it even more despicable and uncomfortable with worse conditions and maybe even importing some spiders and snakes to go along with the rats and cockroaches

And THEN we should use it as the model for all prisons the country over, its about time prison was returned to being a punishment rather than a holiday camp

[ubermik]

Token, that might be what you would LIKE most to have aaid, but that and reality are two extremely different things

What has however been a common criticism of the pair of limelight junkies tho is the total self absorbed manner they seem to have been conducting themselves in since maddy vanished

Theyve on many numerous occasions dumped the kids on other people for press conferences and pointless jet setting around the world

They have kept the existing two kids where they are rather than taking them HOME so they could start to live a normal life again

They have (when it suited them) quite happily paraded them for the press to show what “devoted” parents they were and only now have started to shy away from that now the press is, as are many people getting sick to the back teeth of their sychophantic attention seeking endless whining and have finally started to realise they themselves could actually be complicit in their own daughters murder or abduction

I cant say I have seen a single person saying they SHOULD be permanently in a darkened room and therefore disregarding their kids welfare just as much as before but in a different way, what has been commented on tho is their seeming lack of any remorse, acceptance of personal responsibility, guilt, conscience or anything else that it would seem most decent parents WOULD be feeling if they had through their own selfishness caused the abduction of one of their kids which ISNT by any stretch of even the most idiotic imaginations the same as saying they should be constantly in a darkened room, just that many if not most people would think they would be more likely to be doing that than parading around for the press at any given opportunity like wanna be celebs which ALSO isnt in the slightest bit what could be called being “there for their kids”, its being there for the limelight at the expense of the kids they havent lost or killed YET

[Author]

Posts