Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@emmalush wrote:
New labour use global warming as an excuse to tax us in huge quantities via petrol.
New labour could ban smoking as they claim its bad for us, but make billions in tax, and now want more.
New labour allow thousands of fast food outlets to sell us bad food, and then blame people for being obese.
New labour created 24 hour alcohol outlets and then blame humans for alcohol abuse.
New labour create a liberalised society knowing that either
A, we’ll enjoy it, theres no problem and thank them, thus they are great.
B, we’ll enjoy it, but humans being humans we’ll abuse it, they know this is highly likely, then they step in and say, we gave you a liberal society and you failed to make it work so we’ll have to punish you.Whilst all this is happening, they’re sitting in 10 downing street deciding which tax they can get away with next, were collectively too busy to acknoledge what they do, and at the same time, the media are showing a small percentage of alcohol users behaving badly, or a graph showing obesity levels rocketing, or lung cancer, and whilst you watch this after a hard days work eating your dinner, you believe that they must be right.
Liberalism, and especially the authoritarian version we have today, does not work.
If YOU aint carefull, you’ll wake up one day and wonder why you need to show your personal documents to a PCSO when you go shop.
totally agree one hundred percent emmalush.. innit nice when the governent play right into the hands of the bnp and its supporters. te country is behginning to wake up to the facist regime that we have had foisted on us via gordon brown, the jailing of the murdering muslim fanatics this week just goes to show that the bnp are right. keep it up mr brown youre doing the cause no end of good. :lol:
what a wonderful peaceful multicultural religion islam is… i dont want to crow..
BUT I TOLD YOU SO
this is only the tip of the iceberg, when they get the go ahead for seperate schooling and sharia law. it will be chaos in this country. we can expect to see the fruits of islam all acros britain, such as beheadings in the town centres on sunday mornings, and floggings and limb removal before the weekly footy matches. cant wait…saw it on sky news weeks ago but i thought it was realy sad so i didnt post it. poor dog, poor man, its hard to know what happened innit ? its probably a blessing that the dog died as well cos had it lived it would have either been punished or would have missed his owner..
here here here !!!!!
ugly pudgy little freckle faced fatfooks shud be forced into the gym for three hours a day.. gh i hate hate hate to see fat wobbly kids. there is NO excuse for any parent to allow their bone idle offspring to look like billy bunters. i hate going intop town on a weekend and walking past mc duffers or kffc [kentucky fat f8kker chicken]and burger princess. just to see em all stuffin their ugly fat faces. and their parents are no better. have you seen how heeeooooowwwwge some of their mothers are.. whoever invented leggings wants shooting with a shi+ cannon.
primarks got a lot to answer for. i saw a girl t5he other day. she cou;dnt have been more than 25 years old. and she was carrying a ston for every year around her sorry flabby ar3e her childre. 3 of them had more chins than a chinse fone book. and they couldnt have run for a bus without causing a time rift.
im no beauty by far, but what the fek are these mothers and fathers thinking… they must roll their babies in flour to see where the nappy goes ??? how the fek do these women get pregnant ???they must have husbands [or cousins] with foot long dicks…
its fairly simple realy. dss offices should give these people a pass. and when theyve had four burgers in a month. they lose their pass. anyone who works for a living either has better things to do on a weekend or cant afford to go there, cos theyve got mortgages and bills to pay. and weekend fathers are some of the worst offenders, you can spot em every time, they are the ones with the well dressed kid, hair all loveley and clean, [the kid muppet] sat with the girl, who could be the eldest child but yer not sure, you know the one, all lip gloss and cleavage and she only looks twelve, and the real child is giving the lookalikey mum, a hard time. you just know that that child is gunna be sick bfore the days out. cos daddy feels guilty as fek, and new girlfriend has only ever been a babysitter before.and hasnt got a clue hw to say no..
but back to the question yes parents of fffffaaaaattt bstards hould be charged by the kilo for their kids. if they break the school furniture they are too fat.
charge em congestion chare. the more room the take up the more they get charged..
incidentally this does not apply to the 00000.5 percent of children with glandular problems.. [thats about three quaters of the nation if you believe their fat fek mother and fathers] :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:go granny go granny go granny go granny go go go…
i hope they tae to muggin hoodies. can you imagine the headlines… ha ha ha…
five pensioners were ordered to do one hundred hours comunity service each for mugging an innocent fourteen year old in an underpass in huiddersfield town centre… the five known as the crumbly crew threatened and intimmidated the teen bu taking their teeth out and gumming him for five mintes before the poor teen gave them his i pod. the leader of the crumbly crew admitted he didnt know what an i pod was, but pleaded with the courts that he has a serious pipe tobacco habit. speaking for the freedom for hoodies group mr dunnit said. its time these pensioners were brought to book, after all they have had ample time to learn their lesson. a spokesman for the crumblies said. we dont know if all of the gang will serve their sentences as two are due for hip replacements, and a thord is due in court fo non payment of council tax. a council spokesperson [of non defined ethnicity or sexual persuasion said. these pensioers do not represent all older people. and people should not be under the impression that all people with facially lined impediments should be stigmatised by the actions of a few.my mums 75.. i cant wait o see her mug shot on crimewatch…. ha ha ha ha ha nice one
well lets face it. if it saves just one child from the kind of death the poor baby this week had it would be worth it. there is nothing parents can do now to find out who is working with their children, the government tell us that schools and hospitals, an things such as scout groups and after school groups re monitored. but the truth is very different, hospitals rarelydo checks on employees and schools almost never do. [ian huntley comes to mind] and believe me nomatter what the government says it hasnt got any better. i have a relative who works for a mental health home and they never check backgrounds because the staff turnover is high and the checks cost 15 pounds each. the kind of home she works in looks after very vunerable people. this is just one instance. the fact is that if yo are an organisation that is motivated by profit [and they almost all are] the safety of your residents may be important, but profits and staff staying are more important, if they get a staff member who is willing to do a 40 hour week, and every weekendin overtime, they dont give a toss if their references arent chased up. i know of homes where they dont do any checks, so how many are there.
to get back to sarahs law, there will always be the chancers who want to take a child, and these will be almost impossible to stop, but while we have police officers and judges who are downloading kiddy porn its not likeley to stop is it ? sarahs law is the beginning, and who cares if every paedophile in great britain is killed by baying mobs. there is collatteral damage in every war and if we kill a few who cares ? i know there are folk who will say, yes but innocent people will die… yep its called life. innocent people die falling down stairs, on the roads, in pub foghts and in tragedys every day. id rather lose a few innocent adults than one two year old child be raped and killed.@forumhostpb wrote:
Thing is …. if the Government is so set against smoking, then all they have to do is to make it illegal to sell tobacco in all its forms …. and lose the billions in revenue that they take every year from smokers.
They could even deduct this lost revenues from the sale of tobacco products from the NHS budget.
After all, if smokers were forced to quit like this, they would all be much more healthy (allegedly) and the NHS would have less work to do and therefore need less money.
they aren goin to do that tho are they. because the tax revnue form cigarettes is equal to the whole of he nhs budget and a third of the defence budget. what next tax bullets the same rate as fags???
i dont know about anywhere else but here in yorkshire no one buys fags form shops anymore, we all buy them from wagon drivers and people who go abroad. i haver a friend who spends his whole week travelling to prague and spain just buying fags to sell on. he has been stopped twice but the profits make it worth his while. we get our fags for 28 quid for 200 and he gets free travel and food.the government and their barmy tax everything and bully everyone schemes are doing nothing but make people break the law. there will be a backlash beforew long and ill be at the ront of the que.@prettypink wrote:
Think they should let the publican decide, that way, there will be some smoking pubs, and some no smoking pubs, then smokers and non smokers can have a choice, Much better
idea, cant see it happining though!! :(well said thet person. :wink: :wink:
i was a publican for over ten years and came out of the trade last year the three monthe after the ban came in werent too bad, but as soon as the eather got bad it kiled my business, there are now 4 pubs to let in our village, and two clubs close by have closed. and its all totally down to the smoking ban. the government told everyone that the pubs would be full of families all spending and having a good time with no smokers in, anfd the oposite is the norm. now families stay at home still and so do the smokers, so in fact the real losers are the children, where before the ban, mum and dad had a pint and a fag while kids were tucked up with a babysitter or gran, they now have to put up with mum and dad arguing cos neither an go for a pint and a fag, this has caused untold domestic trouble and the kids are the ones suffering, well done anti smokers you have condemned children to a life of tension and fag smoke.
:wink: :wink:and they want us to carry biometric id cards ?. then when someone uses your identity to defraud the government they will know exactly where to come to shoot you for the crime, there will be no trials, no jutice, because it wont be needed. they will have all your details and all the evidence hey need. the fact that you may be innocent is immaterial. yer names on the computer database, and computers dont make mistakes. welcome to big brother land. the land of the free and condemned.
what a load of bollo*
while yer at i jail pensioners who smell of wee.
people who stink of garlic.
people who are on the dole.
people who drive at 20 mph everywhere.
people who pay for thei shopping with mountains of change.
people who dont drink up in the ten minutes allowed by law.
people who park on double yellow lines.
people who swear.
people who fart.
people who dont go to church.
people who dont pick their crisp packets up.
and dont forget, release the burglars, rapists poor pensioners and car thieves..
smiley yer a muppet.. :wink:
