Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@minim wrote:
I am in no way excusing what he did, the man is a monster, but why.. oh why was someone who had his kind of psychological profile allowed close contact with such a small child, and why… was a schizophrenic mother and her mothering ability not followed up carefully, particularly as the father was this particular man.
I suppose that nobody would believe that anyone would do what he did to a tiny baby.
It is just so very very sad.
Care in the community..another disastrous legacy from the Thatcher government.
because when social service DO actually do something, and try to take the baby away. the parents appear on tv crying and whinging about the evil government stealing their babies. then we have an army of fluffy veggie, sandal wearing, bearded fekwits. crying human rights. the baby is then left with the nutters, and the rest is history now.
@cas wrote:
@waspish wrote:
@sharongooner wrote:
Its a bit like suing the pub landlord for serving the alcholic.
There is only so far you can go before you have to admit the problem is yours and you need help.
Suing the bookies will not help his recovery for his illness, and will take the focus of his illness away from himself. This is Not what an addict actually needs.
If he wins the case that makes him seem he was right, when clearly he wasnt.
Why does someone with an income of 30k plus per month gamble? Because he is ill and that is what he should be addressing, rather than trying to cream back some of his money.
Apparantly the Ryder Cup was the deciding factor in this case. Had the outcome been the opposite would he have given his winnings back because he was on a “ban”? Course he would :wink:
i once had a very animated discussion with the wife of a customer in my pub. she came in and started shouting and swearing at me for selling beer to her husband every tea time. she said i was a family wrecker and a scum bag. she ranted about the fact that he was a drunk, and the fact that he couldnt help himself, he just had to drink every day, and as i served him beer it was. in her opinion, my fault that he went home every night pi$$ed as a fart . [her words]. when i asked her why she blamed me for the fact that her hubby was always drunk. she stated that i was the one with the pub, and it was my job to take his money off him when he should be spending it on his family. so in essence i was taking money from her and her children.
she simply couldnt grasp the fact that it was he, who had the problem. it wasnt my fault that he got drunk every day. yes he called for a couple of pints. but i wasnt responsible for the fact that he went to 5 other pubs before he came to mine.
having an addiction to anything is useually because you are an addictive person. some are, some arent. how many people do we know who cant just have one pint ? they have to get legless. ? how many people do we know who cant have one bet. ? they chase their losses until they lose everything ? even people who go to the gym can become obsessive. whatever the addiction is, they and they alone are responsible for deciding where the cut off point is. and somepeople sadly just dont know when to give up.You are aware I take it Waspy, that you are in fact responsible. It does state under licensing laws, that one of the pple you shouldn’t serve with alchohol along with policemen, firemen etc., in uniform, is someone who is clearly already drunk. So if this man had visited 5 other pubs before coming to yours, and drank 2 pints in each, it was up to you not to serve him in yours :wink: so in a way, she did have a point! :wink:
not once does it say that i ever served him while he was obviously drunk. he was useually well past it when he got to mine, and i chucked him out many a time. but he is a character, and his wife is a frost faced harridan who thinks she should be the mayoress..[ya know the type.. how very dare you.it is an offence to do so. as is serving an officer in uniform as you say, and its also an offence to serv a known prostitute. but hey, wether you are a married woman. or a drunkard of a man, we are all prostitutes of a fashion and we are all drunk at different levels. i would personally never serve a copper be he/she drunk or sober.[not knowingly anyway. if i knew there was a copper waiting to be served, id take his/her order and then make em wait for a day or so, or till id dealt with more important customers, you know. like working folk or people who walk about while at work. :wink: :wink:
yep add to that the fella who was almos tkicked to death at the weekend for challenging a group of scum bags who were using his garden wall as a toilet, and what do you get. britain today.. where the yobs the hoodrats and the screaming brats are treated like little gods and little princesses by their fekless idiot parents. they do, and get everything they want. and the minute their spoiled little faces are told no, they go and take it out on anyone who gets in their way. these slime balls should be locked up for LIFE not for 5 or 6 years [as they will] but for life.
the thing is not one of the so caled political parties will do a damned thing about it. they will all posture and wring their hands. they will all promise to do something about it whan “we” get to power. and in reality they will just carry on lining their pockets and build ever higher walls for those who can afford it. and the rest of the nation will carry on losing fathers, sons and family, to…. you got it.. poor little children who have no where to go and got caught up in the wrong crowd…
yesterday i saw on the news that the anti teen sound boxes are to be baned because it infringes their human rights !!!!! f.f.s what about this mans life… what about gary newloves life… what about the old fella from hyde in cheshire who died of a heart attack on saturday last because he challenged a gang of teens who were wrecking his neighbours car…its not only these scum who should be locked up its their parents as well.
why hasnt the government called curfew for all kids between the ages of 10 and 18. why isnt the army on the streets in these towns, on these estates. where are the parents of these vermin ?
who will make a stand and get the rubber bullets out ?
why hasnt ther been vigilante groups started ? is it because all the parents of these thugs are unaware what their little darlings are doing ? is i f**k they dont give a shit, just as long as they get to watch emmerdale, corrie, and eastenders in peace, who gives a shit what their fekless offspring are doing. ?
why arent decent people fighting back ? because if you dare raise even your voice to the little sheites YOU are the one who will be in front of the courts.
there is only one way to deal with these ferral brats. and that is to do the same to a few of them. tar and feather the gits. beat them sensless and dump them back on mummys doorstep.
paint their houses with “scum live here”.. in foot high letters.
name and shame them. dont give them anonomity !tell us all who they are.
dont pander to the social services, they dont care. all they are interested in, is furthering their well cushioned careers. dont ring the police ! your wasting your time dont you get it yet.. they dont care. its what the government want. everyone scared to go on the streets.unless youre going either to or from work. they know where we all are then.. get a hold of the shits and scare the life out of em. give them a beating they will never forget and leave em to each other.
or do like my mate did when 3 hoodrats burgled his mum. he locked them all in a garage for 48 hours with a bottle of water and nothing else. they were terrified, they were soooo sorry and their parents were beside themselves wondering where their little sods were. but ill tell ya what.. they neve did it again.
its time that we took the streets back from these scum, and its time we did it now..
im not holding my breath tho cos sure as eggs is eggs there willbe those who just say.
“we dont understand them, they just need some love” as jim royle would say.. MY ARSE !how many so called health professionals saw this poor baby and passed the buck. a paediatrician who saw the baby hqad serious concerns for her, but did nothing about it because he didnt want any legal comebacks. i hope the sick bstard dies screaming. and even thats too good. but hey ! in todays society they will all cover their arses and all come out saying lessons have been learned. and they will ALL get away with this, as they always do. the entire nhs, and social services will close ranks, lose files and keep their 50 grand a year jobs. just as they always do.
@sharongooner wrote:
Its a bit like suing the pub landlord for serving the alcholic.
There is only so far you can go before you have to admit the problem is yours and you need help.
Suing the bookies will not help his recovery for his illness, and will take the focus of his illness away from himself. This is Not what an addict actually needs.
If he wins the case that makes him seem he was right, when clearly he wasnt.
Why does someone with an income of 30k plus per month gamble? Because he is ill and that is what he should be addressing, rather than trying to cream back some of his money.
Apparantly the Ryder Cup was the deciding factor in this case. Had the outcome been the opposite would he have given his winnings back because he was on a “ban”? Course he would :wink:
i once had a very animated discussion with the wife of a customer in my pub. she came in and started shouting and swearing at me for selling beer to her husband every tea time. she said i was a family wrecker and a scum bag. she ranted about the fact that he was a drunk, and the fact that he couldnt help himself, he just had to drink every day, and as i served him beer it was. in her opinion, my fault that he went home every night pi$$ed as a fart . [her words]. when i asked her why she blamed me for the fact that her hubby was always drunk. she stated that i was the one with the pub, and it was my job to take his money off him when he should be spending it on his family. so in essence i was taking money from her and her children.
she simply couldnt grasp the fact that it was he, who had the problem. it wasnt my fault that he got drunk every day. yes he called for a couple of pints. but i wasnt responsible for the fact that he went to 5 other pubs before he came to mine.
having an addiction to anything is useually because you are an addictive person. some are, some arent. how many people do we know who cant just have one pint ? they have to get legless. ? how many people do we know who cant have one bet. ? they chase their losses until they lose everything ? even people who go to the gym can become obsessive. whatever the addiction is, they and they alone are responsible for deciding where the cut off point is. and somepeople sadly just dont know when to give up.she comes across as a decent woman to me. but you can guarantee she will be slated as racist and a nazi for joining the bnp. just as many thousand are doing now. im not in the slightest bit bothered wha people think of me, but the bnp are the only party who represent ordinary working people. [of every colour] as ive said before i have west indian friends who are bnp supporters. the rest of the muppet parties just carry on lining their pockets and raping the country, at least the bnp are honest about what they stand for.
@emmalush wrote:
@waspish wrote:
stop[ their benefits because he made himself jobless by choice.. ???? cant they do this ???
give em a free holiday in pakistan for the daughters,and the mother. and send the males to afghanistan. saves em doing it in the future innit….RAF surveillance planes hear Taliban fighters talking in Brummie and Yorkshire accents
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23436839-details/RAF%20surveillance%20planes%20hear%20Taliban%20fighters%20talking%20in%20Brummie%20and%20Yorkshire%20accents/article.do“british” born muslims fighting to kill our british troops.
Just how many of the other 3 million “british” muslims are thinking this way?
What kind of future are you voting for?
BNP A BETTER FUTURE FOR THE WORKING AND SICK OF CARRYING THE REST.
stop[ their benefits because he made himself jobless by choice.. ???? cant they do this ???
give em a free holiday in pakistan for the daughters,and the mother. and send the males to afghanistan. saves em doing it in the future innit….
scrounging dirty bstards. id love to wipe the grins off their faces. they are no more than vermin get em out of my country. and they can tek a couple of thousand o chavs and hoodrats wiv em. and dont forget all their brothers and sisters in islam.:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :
mabey hes a bit ahead of himself……
wasnt there a poem….
if you can keep your head, whil;e all about youlose theirs… o summat ? mabey he just took it literally…. sorryR.E teacher… says it all to me. religion – child marriage, paedophilia, priests, molesting little children, left in trust with them by parents, viscious nuns,beating and abusing children, because theyre frustrated to fek. mohammed married a 9 year old ffs. what else do these creatures have to do before the majority of muppet parents stop leaving their children where they can be got at ??? he may be a teacher. but he teaches religion. and religion endorses child molestation simple as. :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
if that were my child. even at 16 id cut his fekkin nuts off and feed em to him. and no flava beans.
