Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@sharongooner wrote:
I think waspish is feeling a little foolish :oops: bless her little stingey bottom :wink:
bang on there pet i feel a prat and well deserved i misread the post [pisssst again.] on sat nite after watchin rugby i thought he meant the england team. :oops: :oops: :oops:
sorry all for mekkin a fool o mysen. :lol: :lol: im sooo looking forward to final tho kn we do it dya reckon ? im half english half aussie but im in turmoil with the rugby. sooo many choices sooo many gorgeous men. not that i view men as sex objects or anything [heaven forbid] i can just apreciate a well honed body when i see one :lol: :lol: :lol:@American Woman wrote:
@mellowcello wrote:
I think all this disrespect to our church goin brethren is nothing short of fu**in outrageous.
I bet those of you whose married got married in church, got your kids christened in church, went to funerals etc……double standards if you ask me, have a bit of respect in future you dont know whats round the corner! 8)Matthew 7:1-5
1 Judge not, that ye be not judged. 2 For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured unto you. 3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? 4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me cast out the mote out of thine eye; and lo, the beam is in thine own eye? 5 Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye. O:)
TEK YOU AND YER SMITIN AND WILT THOUIN AND FEK RITE OFF PAL
FEAR IS RELIGION
RELIGION IS FEAR
and waspish said breathe bensons and hedges upon them, bring thine wine to mine and the oord knows ill be happpppy god is a nasty joke on the world by the little people …@~Pebbles~ wrote:
as far as im concerned of course they should but that brings us down to the government wanting us married, i,m married and very happily thank god. but many people are not and why should some be forced to stay married because they are a handy tax break… as used to be the case. it was quite difficult in the 1950s for women to be granted quick divorces as their husbands regarded their wives part of the goods, do we realy want to go back to that. ? and then where ?moetary insentives to stay child free. i wish :wink:
@bassingbourne55 wrote:
More important here would be new laws specifically drafted to control the powers or assumed powers of all religions. Chief among these would be:
1) No child is born a member of any religion. Nobody may be assumed to be a full member of any religion until the age of 18.
2) No religion may claim that any unverifiable superstitious beliefs are facts.
3) No religion may promote derogatory or abusive attitudes towards non-believers.
4) The highest penalty any religion may impose on any member for transgressing religious rules is expulsion from that religion.
YOU SHOULD STAND FOR PARLIAMENT WITH THIS AS YOUR MANIFESTO ID VOTE FOR YA> :lol: RELIGION IS A WORSE MURDERER THAN HITLER
@dead_on_arrvial wrote:
I find it funny about the NHS but you all moan like hell when taxies go up to pay for it.
No government is going to up taxies by 10% to meet the cost of it, in real terms its needs a lot more investment.
But government is more concerned with paying people to have children and subsidising low paying jobs.
Its time you all realized that the NHS is over work, over stressed and not fit for purpose.
FEK ME THATS WHY THERE IS SO MANY TAXIS IN TOWNS
@ubermik wrote:
I hardly think the point is to encourage women who CAN have a career to turn into junk food eating daytime telly watching mindless no hopers really nor is it to further line the pockets of people who already have the money from two incomes
For something like this to have any value it should be aimed at women who think actually putting time and effort into running a home and being a proactive hands on parent is a worthwhile pursuit and WHY people have kids by affording them the ability to do so rather than begrudgingly HAVING to work to make ends meet or risking their relationship ending due to financial pressures which is a common reason for relationships breaking down in order to afford more kids a stable mum and dad enviroment to grow up in as theres more than enough impirical data to show this IS the best start in life for a child, better on average than only having one parent and better on average than having two parents who see them rarely because their careers, holidays, nice cars. plasma screen TV’s, new kitchens, brand name clothes etc etc etc etc are more important to them than their kids
Well said uber i totally agree there. i had two children, stayed at home for 7 years in total but always had a part time job working around hubbys job, he made the vast majority of our income and my money paid for treats. but my mate who is single and on benefits is better off financially all round than we are.people who work as a couple should benefit but any contract has to be open to all to reflect that we have changed as a society, my sister has been with her partner for 30 years but theyre not married ?
@r.O.T.T wrote:
post your contempt here for the soon to be thrashed
i,ll bet you feel like a rite T.W.A.T now doncha !!!!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
youve got a point there matey thats why i never carry id with me along with credit cards and bank details, you.just never know who youre stood next to nowadays, but getting back to topic im sure there will be toerags already planning how to steal our id and access to credit etc and another kind of id will just give them more things to use ???
the bourne series brilliant fun and a story as well. who would have thought one man could do sooooo much in a hour and a half…. :o :o :o
I cant help but wonder where the market for these id cards will lie, will we find that if we have an id card stolen ? where will it end up ? could someone in say , poland buy it ? and possibly my entire details. will they be able to get details from it. and use my id for anything they want. we can be certain that as fast as the government can create safety reasons for them the bad guys will find a reason to use them ?
