Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 39 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #10676

    This thread is for all your budding film critics. Got a fave movie, be it one you have seen at the cinema, or a recent dvd release? Then post your reviews here.

    I am going to kick off the proceedings with a review of 30 Days of Night.

    “30 Days of Night” is a very welcome addition to the realm of vampire flicks. This movie however is not for the pseudo gothic romantics that dream of being bitten by Gary Oldman, (tho that idea does kinda appeal to me) but it is more for the fans of true gritty horror.

    The fun begins in Barrow, Alaska, the northernmost city in the world, where once a year during the winter, the sun disappears for 30 days. Isolated from almost everywhere by an 80 mile radius of snow and ice, the town begins to prepare for the longest “night” of the year.

    The Vampires, which are a cross between Nosferatu and Marylin Manson, are brutal, sinister and unrelenting in their pursuit of their prey. I found it refreshing to see a Vampire flick that doesn’t hold back on the violence and terror that most films of this genre shy away from.

    This film is not just about the brutal vampire feeding frenzy however, but about sacrifice and protecting loved ones regardless of the dangers. Relationships are put to the test in more ways than one, resulting in the ultimate sacrifice for one of the survivors.

    The two main leads Eben and Stella, brilliantly portrayed by Josh Harnett and Mellisa George, bring an emotional depth to the film that could so easily have been lost amidst the gore and violence.

    The cinematography is breathtaking, enhanced by visual effects that are stunningly realistic in places and sometimes subtle in others.

    Overall if you want a Vampire movie that goes back to the terrifying roots that began with Nosferatu then this is the film for you.

    Highly reccomended =D> =D> =D> =D>

    #351341

    Great thread Cymorill 8) ..

    And an excellent review to kick it all off!
    I really enjoyed that one too.. :)

    #351342

    A great idea, hope it takes off. :)

    #351343

    Right.. being the film fusspot that I am, may I suggest the following Empire-esque grading template with regard to reviews?

    =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> BrilliantAn unmissable experience

    =D> =D> =D> =D> Very GoodHighly recommended

    =D> =D> =D> SatisfyingNot everyone’s cup of tea, but a solid enough example of type

    =D> =D> DisappointingCaution advised

    =D> AwfulClapping because it’s over. Total cruelty. Avoid at all costs

    #351344

    There Will Be Blood

    The best movie of the year and one of the best acting performances of all time comes to DVD carrying a cartload of critical praise and awards.. and deservedly so.

    Paul Thomas Anderson is not the most prolific of directors. Since his breakthrough with the wonderful BOOGIE NIGHTS eleven years ago, he has given us just two titles – the excellent MAGNOLIA (1999) and the flawed, but nonetheless curious PUNCH-DRUNK LOVE (2002).
    Perhaps such reluctance to “churn them out” as it were has been a significant factor in shaping and developing an entirely singular cinematic consciousness. For this is what he has achieved with THERE WILL BE BLOOD.
    Right from the off, with an extended opening sequence that has no dialogue, Anderson relies on the language of cinema itself to set his stall out. And what better way to catalyse this expression than through the awesome presence of the greatest actor on the planet today.

    It is not through speaking that we begin to know Daniel Plainview (Daniel Day-Lewis) during the film’s opening. It is through this immediate, powerful presence – a man possessing the very physical manifestation of unstoppable, driven determination. Switching from silver prospecting to oil, Plainview senses exploitation at the expense of a farming family (the Sundays, in particular the young goatherd Paul) who speak of oil to be found on their land. Plainview could easily strike a deal with them. But, being a compulsive cheat, he chooses to swindle.
    Adopting the baby of a miner who dies in an accident, Plainview embraces the boy, HW, as a surrogate son, but he uses him to project the image of a family man to the Sundays, claiming that God sent him their way. Yet, it is at the hands of Paul’s religious zealot brother Eli (played by the same actor, Paul Dano) that Plainview finds his enterprise constantly thwarted.

    It is this zealotry, together with greed for money and power, that make up the combined themes of THERE WILL BE BLOOD and while Anderson and Day-Lewis have denied an intended allegory, the film inevitably strikes a contemporary relevance.

    Yet, like all great epic stories, there are moments of intimate, tragic humanism. For all the steel and cold seduction of Plainview’s character, and his apparent lack of caring or emotion, he is humanised – to a point – in his relationship with HW , and when that point is reached, the film becomes heartbreaking.

    Day-Lewis is absolutely outstanding. He strides this film like a Colossus. A power-performance of volcanic ferocity, yet brilliantly weighted with slithering charm and stealth.. and one that deservedly won him a second Oscar earlier this year.

    It feels almost like divine providence that both director and star came together at the right time to bring about this masterpiece.

    Praise be :)

    =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

    #351345

    I have missed your novella’s Sgt :wink: :lol: . Great review as always. :D

    #351346

    heard the one about two film critics ? first one says “I’d like to mention kubrick’s I’m Spartacus scene”

    second one says “No, I’D like to mention kubricks…………..”

    cool thread
    x

    #351347

    The Forbidden Kingdom

    In “The Forbidden Kingdom”, martial arts stars Jackie Chan and Jet Li come together for the first time on screen in this latest offering from animator-turned-director, Rob Minkoff.

    Legend has it that in ancient China, the Jade Warlord, imprisoned the powerful Monkey King; thus, ensuring his reign. The source of the Monkey King’s power, his golden staff, was banished to another dimension. That dimension just happens to be a Chinese pawn shop in South Boston.

    Kung fu movie geek Jason Tripitkas, rents martial arts DVDs from Old Hop, pawn shop owner. Though versed in the way of kung fu movies, Jason has no martial arts skills. In his escape from young thugs, Jason comes to possess the golden staff of the Monkey King, and stumbles into a time portal to ancient China, and the land of the legendary Immortals.

    In ancient china, Jason befriends a drunken kung fu master, comically portrayed by Jackie Chan. A silent monk, played by Jet Li, and an orphaned girl, who refers to herself in the 3rd person. Together the foursome must travel to return the Golden Staff to the Monkey King.

    Whilst the fight scenes are impressive, and the colourful cinematography breathtaking, this film is sadly let down by the obvious Hollywood trick of trying to make as much money from as little as possible, and somehow i think they will succeed.

    If you aren’t huge fan of kung fu movies, you may find this an enjoyable fantasy, however i expect true fans of this genre will come away extremely disappointed, despite the pairing of two legends.

    =D> =D> =D> I’ll give it three points, one each for Jackie Chan, Jet Li and the fight scenes, as they are the only things worth watching in this entire film.

    #351348

    THE DARK KNIGHT

    Christopher Nolan’s second turn at writing/directing the trials and tribulations of the famously troubled superhero is remarkable in so many ways.
    First up, there is the morbidly tempting, rubbernecking frisson of seeing the late Heath Ledger in “Dead Man Acting” mode. Freaky this fascination may be, but let’s face it, it’s real and representative. “Who’d want to see a dead person,” Jack Warner bluntly asked when James Dean passed away before GIANT was released. Judging by the ticket sales for THE DARK KNIGHT, a lot of people do. Maybe not so remarkable afterall :roll: .
    But what is remarkable is this young lad’s performance. Banishing forever the camp histrionics of previous interpretations, Ledger’s Joker is an intriguing product of twisted nature and malevolent nurture.

    As sequels go, this ticks most of the boxes regarding successful formula.. and even conjures up a few more!
    Gone is the need to navigate the more dense pools of exposition, in favour of a darker, commanding and more intense beast. The swirling, multi dimensional plot shows moribund moneybags Bruce Wayne (played with a capable, swelling maturity by the ever dependable Chrsitian Bale) disaffected yet again. Weary of the role of superhero, he longs to settle down with former squeeze Rachel Dawes (the beautifully bumcheeked Maggie Gyllenhaal) but is thwarted on two fronts by her political golden boy boyfriend (Aaron Eckhart’s Harvey Dent) and newly arrived demented nemesis – The Joker.
    Throw in the banter and compassion of Michael Caine’s witty and sensitive Alfred, the understated and unexpectedly affecting performance that is Gary Oldman’s Commisioner Gordon, not to mention the gravitas personified that is always Morgan Freeman.. well, one would be forgiven the urge to bleat “Too many cooks…” :?

    But it is the adroit screenplay, the very juggling of all these seemingly frenetic elements that (together with Ledger’s performance) make THE DARK KNIGHT an exceptional piece of work. The powerhouse story arcs gain urgency from dynamic editing and from Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard’s graceful score. All of which blend beautifully under Nolan’s richly imaginative and boldly assured direction.

    Which brings us finally to The Joker himself..
    Ledger’s performance is in some ways a curiously mannered one. His joker is no eccentric, criminal prankster driven by greed and recognition. No, this is a sadist with elements of masochism. A being so amoral as to lack any sense of human consequence as he sets on watching “the world burn”. Menacing and sinister, he also contrives to convince Bruce he’s just as bonkers as he is. And then, as we get to know the Joker, the film gets to the root of his evil, revealed in a backstory of a horrific childhood experience that illustrates how he acquired the “smile” that became his criminal trademark.
    The whole Hero / Villain coin-flip is hardly groundbreaking, but there are so many ideas flying around in this layered, intelligent script, that surely inspired and catalysed Ledger to produce such an electrifying, truly grandstanding performance.

    Go see it.. Now :)

    =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

    #351349

    going back some…………’Heat’……the long awaited De niro / Pacino scene…..

    Now it could be just me, I’ve seen many say how “electric” it was but somehow I remain dissapointed ? I believe that this momentous dialogue was somewhat lacking in the writing department and the actors involved did the best they could with what they were given. When you consider the quality of the godfather films and that. The directors miami voice vibe seemed to permeate the film anyway at the expense of something unique.

    Maybe I ‘m too picky but does anybody know what I’m getting at ?

Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 39 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!