JC Update

@*Sian* wrote:

Owen you have been one of the biggest contributors to the flaming/baiting so I am finding it hard to understand your standing in all of this. :?
Are you saying you are a changed man? Are you leaving this board or not?
Anyways I have had my say, I don’t really mind the fighting aslong as it has its own place.

I don’t come here to flame, be flamed or read other peoples flaming.
I have responded to the figting here in the past, but I believe it is
detremental to JC.
I have created polls to give JC users a voice, and JC users have spoken.
I support, and will continue to support the users of JC! 8)

@tommy-toxen wrote:

OK if contained.

They do a good job of contaiining at GC
Perhaps you could ask the site admin how and why he does it?

@tommy-toxen wrote:

the flamings can be a good fun to read (or good fun to mock the authors), but there’s no need for them to spill over onto serious threads.

Good point ToM, after all we don’t want to see JC users leaving because
of the flaming spilling all over the boards do we?

@tommy-toxen wrote:

if someone made a “my mum died of cancer” thread for example they wouldn’t want two selfish f**ks squabbling in it about some unimportant tiff carried on from some other thread.

Quite right ToM. Problem is a lot of them do this stuff, and worse. Then
they get there accounts deleted so no one can trawl up the evidence of
their past misdemeanors.

@tommy-toxen wrote:

But if contained, should be encouraged! They bring in the ratings!

Got to disagree there ToM. The number of ‘views’ a thread receives is
massively inflated by just a few contributors. I may ‘view’ a thread five
times to read other peoples posts before I post myself. Then I ‘view’ the
post five times again to read other peoples responses to that post. So
there you have it. I’ve ‘viewed’ the thread twelve times and made only
two posts.