Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
10 November, 2006 at 3:26 pm #247710
:shock: :shock:
You know what……………..i’d never noticed that bout Marys avatar before you pointed it out Lang lol……..Blond AND gettin old :wink: :lol: :lol:
10 November, 2006 at 1:55 pm #247701:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
10 November, 2006 at 12:47 pm #247624@emmalush wrote:
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Emma, they have the idiots on tape
What constitutes incitement to racial hatred?
Do you believe that if hatred does not occur through words spoken, then that means you broke the law?
Also, if convicted, should the bbc be in court for inciting racial hatred by publishing “the” incitement to racial hatred?
I haven’t read the BNP manifesto
You’re quite happy to insult the BNP, but not there policy. Tell me which of there policies you think is bad for the wider society? if you cant find one, or enough to suggest they are bad, then shouldn’t you admit that they do have something to offer the wider society?
Emma, are you whiter than white, british down to your bones, I hope so, because if they should ever gain power, no one would be safe who wasn’t originally white/british, if you like, born and bred in this country. Their policies of re-patriation doesn’t just apply to black/asian/eastern european etc etc., I have Irish blood in my veins, they’d want rid of me too :roll: :roll:
9 November, 2006 at 5:06 pm #247621@rubyred wrote:
aye cas..*shudder* poor kid,he was literally in the wrong place at wrong time.walking home then grabbed,he was tortured too,castrated and his eyes removed ! They wont get an easy time inside,but dont bring that poor laddie back eh ?
some things are better Not thought about,,its a sad day…hopefully lessons will be learned,but in todays society i doubt it !I doubt it too Ruby…………….not until our inadequate justice system wakes up n smells the coffee. Kids are running riot, out of control, and why? cos they can. Iv’e told off 7 year olds in the park for throwing rocks at the ducks, they told me to f*ck off or they’d get a copper n tell them I hit them, then i’d be arrested !! :roll:
My own son is 18, yea he can handle himself, he’s been threatened many times, once when he was taking his g/f to the bus stop, because he looked at someone, the guy said he had a knife, Mike said, well you best not miss!!!! the other guy walked away. When he comes over to me, he rings me, when he gets back to his dads to let me know he’s home ok, I know I shouldn’t worry, worrying isn’t going to prevent anything happening but as a parent, I can’t help it. The areas we both live in has got progressively worse over the recent couple of years and the police are powerless, and sometimes just downright ignorant to it, turn a blind eye. The 16 year old boy who was stabbed this year, January I think it was, at Upney Station, thats about 25 yards from where I live. There are still gangs of black youths, hang around outside that station every night. It’s not often I get on a train, I drive, but if I do need to use the train, they can be very intimidating, make remarks etc etc., I was myself, punched in the shoulder, same one i’d had op on couple weeks before, why? because I was in someone’s way!!! two of those what I call plastic policemen saw this happen and did nothing!! In my car, I carry a can of gas, i’d be in trouble if I was caught with it, but the person who tries anything, when maybe i’m on my way home from work at 10 at night, will be in more trouble!
9 November, 2006 at 4:48 pm #247620@rubyred wrote:
here you go cas..was a right shocker that one !
Tks for finding that for me Ruby…………..25 years isn’t long enough. 100 years wouldn’t be long enough. It was senseless, there was no reason for it other than they could!!
My feelings are with that boys parents, you just can’t imagine what a nightmare those people are having to live.
9 November, 2006 at 3:59 pm #247689@langstraat wrote:
CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL THE KIDS WHO WERE BORN IN THE
1930’s 40’s, 50’s, 60’s and 70’s !First, we survived being born to mothers who smoked and/or drank while they carried us.
They took aspirin, ate blue cheese dressing, tuna from a can, and didn’t get tested for diabetes.
Then after that trauma, our baby cribs were covered with bright colored lead-based paints.
We had no childproof lids on medicine bottles, doors or cabinets and when we rode our bikes, we had no helmets, not to mention, the risks we took hitchhiking.
As children, we would ride in cars with no seat belts or air bags.
We drank water from the garden hose and NOT from a bottle.
We shared one soft drink with four friends, from one bottle and NO ONE actually died from this.
We ate cakes, white bread and real butter and drank pop with sugar in it, but we weren’t overweight because……
WE WERE ALWAYS OUTSIDE PLAYING!!We would leave home in the morning and play all day, as long as we were back when the streetlights came on.
No one was able to reach us all day. And we were O.K.We would spend hours building our go-carts out of scraps and then ride down the hill, only to find out we forgot the brakes. After running into the bushes a few times, we learned to solve the problem.
We did not have Playstations, Nintendo’s, X-boxes, no video games at all, no 99 channels on cable, no video tape movies, no surround sound,no cell phones, no personal computers, no Internet or Internet chat rooms……….WE HAD FRIENDS and we went outside and found them!
We fell out of trees, got cut, broke bones and teeth and there were no
lawsuits from these accidents.We ate worms and mud pies made from dirt, and the worms did not live in us forever.
We made up games with sticks and tennis balls and although we were told it would happen, we did not put out very many eyes.
We rode bikes or walked to a friend’s house and knocked on the door or rang the bell, or just yelled for them!
Football teams had trials and not everyone made the team. Those who didn’t had to learn to deal with disappointment. Imagine that!!
The idea of a parent bailing us out if we broke the law was unheard of.They actually sided with the law!
This generation has produced some of the best risk-takers, problem solvers and inventors ever!
The past 50 years have been an explosion of innovation and new ideas.
We had freedom, failure, success and responsibility, and we learned
HOW TO DEAL WITH IT ALL!And YOU are one of them!
CONGRATULATIONS!You might want to share this with others who have had the luck to grow up as kids, before the lawyers and the government regulated our lives for our own good.
and while you are at it, forward it to your kids so they will know how brave their parents were.
Kind of makes you want to run through the house with scissors, doesn’t it?!PS -The big type is because your eyes are shot at your age
=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
As a child of the 40’s lang, I remember many of those things. :lol: :lol: ……….I wouldn’t have dared go home and tell my mum or dad that the local bobby had told me off :lol: I’d more than likely have gotten a clip round the ear and told well you probably deserved it!!9 November, 2006 at 3:43 pm #247619I think we have to face the fact that the death sentence will never return to this country. Surely though, something more substantial needs to be done to stop these kind of people. Giving them a ”Life” sentence, and then saying that they’d be eligible for parole in ‘x’ amount of years is a complete farce, why say life if they don’t mean life. :roll:
On the news this morning, the schoolboy murderer, the courts have said that he’ll be eligible for parole in 12 years time, it’ll still only make him 28 if he’s released then. The atrocious things he carried out on that child were cold and calculated, so we’ll all feel safe will we in 12 years when he’s released, I think not!!!
The three muslim men, accused and convicted of killing a 16 year old, stabbing him 30 times, setting him alight, the boy was still alive and managed to get himself into a canal and put out the flames, he still later died…………..the ringleader had a string of convictions that’d make your hair curl!! he was, at the time, out on license!! The judge has said, again, that he’ll serve a minimum of 25 years!! I can’t find a link on this one, maybe someone else can. I have to say that I do begrudge my hard earned taxes, keeping this kind of evil scum, because that’s exactly what they are, evil!!!
8 November, 2006 at 3:31 pm #247580@Ow£n Ka$h wrote:
A toilet which flushes to the sound of Italy’s national anthem has been impounded by police in northern Italy, sparking great patriotic debate.
You couldn’t make it up! :lol:
Story here.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
No bloody sense of humour some people :lol: :lol: :lol:
8 November, 2006 at 3:28 pm #247585@slayer wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
Yesterday, in his usual dictator-like media outlet, blair was quized by Adam Boulton of sky news, “should sadam be executed?”.
Blair didnt have the backbone to say yes or no, yet he is trying to enforce a democratic Iraqi government which agrees with executions.
This dictator of ours is quite happy to send our troops into the Iraqi Civil War with full knowledge that they could be executioned themselves.
Also, new labour are against the death penalty, and the last poll said 68% of us want the death penalty, so he knows full well if he agreed sadam should be executioned, that would give the moral argument for us to have it.
Emma- did you actually LISTEN to this broadcast, or is it a soundbite taken from the BNP website?
I LISTENED to the whole interview and whilst I am no supported of Blair, he was quite categoric in what he said and the stance of the government- the reported was a complete pr/at who continually harped on with a question because Blair wouldn’t actually use the word “yes”
Some people don’t agree with me but we can’t all agree can we :lol: but that’s why I like Jeremy Paxman, he’s like a rottweiler lol
8 November, 2006 at 3:27 pm #247584@slayer wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
Yesterday, in his usual dictator-like media outlet, blair was quized by Adam Boulton of sky news, “should sadam be executed?”.
Blair didnt have the backbone to say yes or no, yet he is trying to enforce a democratic Iraqi government which agrees with executions.
This dictator of ours is quite happy to send our troops into the Iraqi Civil War with full knowledge that they could be executioned themselves.
Also, new labour are against the death penalty, and the last poll said 68% of us want the death penalty, so he knows full well if he agreed sadam should be executioned, that would give the moral argument for us to have it.
Emma- did you actually LISTEN to this broadcast, or is it a soundbite taken from the BNP website?
I LISTENED to the whole interview and whilst I am no supported of Blair, he was quite categoric in what he said and the stance of the government- the reported was a complete pr/at who continually harped on with a question because Blair wouldn’t actually use the word “yes”
-
AuthorPosts