Hey, you know what puds lad, I’ll give you that one on Obama. Good research lad. Even though he was a pacifist at heart ( although he did order the taking out of Bin Laden) I guess he hoped that ruSSia wouldn’t become the evil it has. He was wrong of course and he joined a very large band of world leaders who have given the kRemlin too much space. But you see puds, you’ve done it again. You’ve done another ‘whataboutism’ like all tRumpers do.
The thread was ‘Any tRumpers left’ and you’ve more than adequately proved that there are. But you are a dying breed puds lad. tRump is more of a grifting evangelist these days, peddling his moronic ideas, moaning on about windmills when asked about Ukraine. He displays all the attention of a 3 year old.
Anyway, the supposition that pOOtin wouldn’t have dared to invade Ukraine if tRump’s fat arse was still at the Oval office desk is still wildly speculative but no more than I would expect from another deluded tRumper.
So you’ve decided not to answer that exact question that you yourself put in here, because you know you can’t answer it, because if you did, you’d look really stupid. Just like the Jordan Klepper interviews when he asks ‘thick as shit tRumpers’ why they idolise tRump and then they tie themselves in verbal knots. It’s beautiful to see puds lad.
Beautiful.
Nah, I’m kidding. I’m actually quite sad about this. I’m sad that we’re having this debate. I’m sad that your politics are cemented into a rock so solid, you can’t recognise a bad egg from a good one. This debate is a tiny example of the hatred and division that taints our world.
I’m glad i’m in the UK puds lad. We have rain and long waiting lists for the NHS – but we don’t have guns in every household and we are more moderate about our politics.
We are a product of the environment we grow up in. Slava Ukraini.
This reply was modified 3 years, 4 months ago by cooldandywarhol.
This reply was modified 3 years, 4 months ago by cooldandywarhol.
As usual, a tRumper can’t answer a simple question. The stunning lack of tRumper education continues to shock me but not surprise me.
So, a short lesson on the real history and not a tRumper’s view of it.
The US military funding provided to Ukraine was massively increased after the Crimea and Donbas invasions. In other words, the increase occurred during the OBAMA years.
tRump had only to sign the cheques that followed. He was good at signing stuff with his sharpie. Except of course, when he threatened to withhold the funding because he was looking for dirt for his losing 2020 campaign. But that’s cos he’s just a fucking gangsta.
Anyway, back to the consequences and I’ll give you an even bigger lead-in puds lad.
If tRump had still been president the consequences of pOOtin invading Ukraine would have been….
1.
2.
3.
4.
Come on puds lad, just concentrate for a moment and answer the question, seeing as you started it.
This reply was modified 3 years, 4 months ago by cooldandywarhol.
Not too sure what your pointless (as usual) point is fishpaste apart from you proving to jc that you can google. The US and UK have been training the Ukrainian forces ever since the Crimea and Donbas episodes. So ?
I’d be more interested in articles like that one produced by the renown (so called) Rand Corporation just before the war started.