Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
13 June, 2006 at 1:37 pm #224545
@slayer wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
@Magoo wrote:
I think you will find Walcott is the middle finger to the FA. I actually cannot see this lad playing unless we are desperate.
We were desperate for a striker to replace owen yesterday, and ended not playing walcott, when defoe couldve done the job instead of downing.
And the result of the match was……?
England won an opening qualifying match for the first time since 1982
Wrong, we beat tunisia 2-0 in 98.
Yes we won 1-0, but my point is, if you take off a striker (our best available aswell) after 60mins, and replace him with an inexperienced winger, then its negative.
Had we had defoe, he would’ve been the natural replacement, and surely would’ve come on, so why the need for walcott?????
13 June, 2006 at 1:30 pm #222749@Tory Girl wrote:
PS. emmalush, the reason why people are like they are is because of small minded bigots who cant see past the colour of someones face. Ring a bell does it?
Do you mean people are bigots because they dont like multiculturalism?
11 June, 2006 at 1:30 pm #224542@Magoo wrote:
I think you will find Walcott is the middle finger to the FA. I actually cannot see this lad playing unless we are desperate.
We were desperate for a striker to replace owen yesterday, and ended not playing walcott, when defoe couldve done the job instead of downing.
11 June, 2006 at 12:56 pm #224444@slayer wrote:
Really- even your standing has taken a dive calling Al Zaqwari and a “hero for many and more people will salute what he stood for”
Its the truth, what are you afraid of?
Al Zaqwari was an evil, butcherous excuse of human life
This is a really complex statement to answer.
A, yes he is.
B, he defended his way of life from an ilegal and foreign invasion, even though he was a foreigner in iraq also.
C, the people who he did defend, love him, and theres many of them.
D, he is classed as a “terrorist” by terrorists (the coalition).Personally, i think he was less evil than the coalition in terms of the war.
his view of Islam was Sunni based and he called for the deaths of all Shia’s- he had no interest in anything other than perpetuating discord and mayhem- very, very few Iraqi’s supported him or his views
Is that an educated guess, based on what? The media? What the coalition told you? mixture of the 2?
Even your beloved George Galloway
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
I DO NOT love gg. I do like individuals telling the great unwashed, the truth about how our society is run, thats what gg does to a degree.8 June, 2006 at 10:12 pm #224538@Mr Amphibian wrote:
read the original post and the first reply from him/her again. Are there not particular, not very subtle undertones?
Im certainly against a foreigner being England manager, but only because i believe that to have all the qualifications necessary, you have to be English and KNOW what it means to win for the English.
Sven doesn’t come from Basildon so how can he be behind England? That sort of thing. There is what you say and there is what you mean.
Read the original post again, its about picking the best available, not trying to assert ones self as someone who did good, above the prospects of the teams pottential success.
8 June, 2006 at 10:06 pm #224537@Bad Manners wrote:
Experience is everything.
Rooney in 2004 and Owen in 98 were young, but they’d played Premiership games.Thats it, whos better qualified, walcott, beatie, johnson or defoe, theres no contest surely.
8 June, 2006 at 7:12 pm #224533@Bad Manners wrote:
I think it’s madness that a 17 yr old kid, without a full game for his club got into the squad. England could live to regret the decision if they get an injury to Crouch or Owen, and the only backup is a rookie striker.
England didnt make the decision, but England will suffer the consequences.
8 June, 2006 at 2:00 pm #224441@chathostuk wrote:
So it would appear that the militant leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq is no more. What do we think the consequences will be?
He will be seen as a hero who fought for many people, and more people will salute what he stood for.
There is no doubt he was the mastermind and planner behind much of the violence, not only in Iraq but also overseas.
But certainly not the only one.
Will there be less violence in Iraq now he has gone?
NO.
Will it be easy for the insurgents to look up to and accept a new leader?
No, but thats not the issue our media blag us with. When your fighting a war like such, its kill or be killed. The locals there have a much bigger community spirit than westerners.
Does this simply highlight the fact that Osama Bin Laden has still not been captured or ‘destroyed’ ?
The american military will “capture” him when it makes them look good back home.
6 June, 2006 at 8:19 pm #221226@Mr Amphibian wrote:
Oh Emma!
So glad you’re talking to me again! I thought I’d lost the pleasure of your company for-ever!
Oh you silly man, i never stopped talking to you, i like a laugh :wink:
Just remember, im not laughing at you, im laughing toooowwaaaarrds you :wink:
:D :) :lol: :P :o
6 June, 2006 at 8:09 pm #223622Ive now heard that the french back four will be
sagnol thurman gallas abidalapparently the line up v china in the friendly will be the line up v switzerland?
italy will play toni and inzaghi or gilardino with totti in support upfront.
-
AuthorPosts
