Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@slayer wrote:
“legal” abuse implies legislation
As always with BNP misreporting of facts, there is no suggestion this will become “law”, the Ouseley report will make recommendations for guidelines …
Guidlines to do what?
@token_male wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
Please note the word “MAY” in my title.
Rape MAY become legal!!!!!
But no one is putting that idea forward.
Marxists are putting this idea forward, which is insane.
You dont have to go against me just because token, we can agree that something bad is wrong, and this idea is bad.
@Mrs Clean wrote:
Yeh Emma send all em all back on the next banana boat :roll:
Thats a rather racist and fascist thing to say.
@pete wrote:
I’d be asking the parents wtf they doing teaching a 3 yr old to discriminate on the grounds of colour or creed
What parent is discriminating on those grounds?
@artist wrote:
Surely u cant have a 3 year old doing exactly what he or she wants to isnt it the problem in society, that some kids run riot growing up to do exactly as they choose.surely discipline is a healthy part of growing up within reason, obviously.
Of course, but were talking about something that they dont have to do, its not an essential part of learning right from wrong, its the lefty fascists version of right and wrong, and thats wrong :D
Squeezy, if a child under these propossed laws refuses to play with another child, what do you think the teacher will do next?
@squeezy wrote:
And how is this mental and physical abuse??? :roll:
Please note the word “MAY” in my title.
IF a child refuses to do something they dont wana do, as 3 year olds do, what does “have to play together” then mean to you?
@tommy-toxen wrote:
A true Sikh would never preach hatred.
I bet you can’t find one example of a Sikh preaching hatred or commiting a terrorist attack.
Go on, off you go to google.
Are you saying that YOU know the definition of true sikhism?
I know of a sikh community LEADER who votes BNP. Are you telling us that every single sikh who adheres to this leader, isnt a true sikh?
@james Belfast wrote:
Since when was 32 ‘nearly 50’? I bet by next week you’ll be saying it’s nearly 100 seats… :wink:
The BNP won 33 seats on thursday, they already had around 15-20.
@tommy-toxen wrote:
A true sikh would never preach hatred.
How many sikh’s dont preach hatred to someone somewhere on earth?
