Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
ladies first, minim
Congrats
saw thread and thought of this
http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/370691I do believe that actions have consequences to them, but as for a more karmic approach to this I simply cannot agree with and in which case it would only be applicable if the individual involved continued with the behaviour and made it well known that is was them partaking of that course of action. (pretty sure with a bit of rewording that might make more sense)
do you think of yourself as a ‘risk taker’ or do you ‘play it safe’?
macabre
may I point out that, save in the case of some football hooligans who collectively have an IQ equivilant to that of a piece of broccoli, it is not actual ‘hate’ that one football fan has against a rival football club, more of a friendly and sportsman-like competitiveness. Also the word ‘nazis’ in German means ‘nationalist’ and last time I looked B.N.P. meant British nationalist party or something near enough to validate my point.
It is better on some occasions not to choose, than to choose the wrong thing.
sometimes doing nothing at all is worse than choosing the ‘wrong’ thing, also one can never fully auger the consequences of an action (hence why we can’t base every decision we make upon the hedonic calculus) so how do we know for sure if an action is the right or wrong thing to do unless we do it, and hopefully learn from any mistakes made along the way. The nature of life itself is based upon trial and error
If I’m not mistaken that’s a picture of the rat onto which an artificial ear was grafted onto correct?
it may seem wrong to look at but the rat showed no physical or psychological distress about the procedure and of course if I recall correctly it helped to develop facial reconstruction procedures that promoted the growth of cartiledge or something of that nature that meant it would appear as though it was natural (might need to do a bit of research, can’t really remember the story that well)finally found some info on the process
http://www.pub.umich.edu/daily/1995/10-25-95/news/Mouse-Ear.htmlnow I believe you’re entering the debate of at what time is the embryo no longer a ‘potential human being’ but an ‘actual human being’. just to go back to the last point you made sharon, choice is the main matter, but the problem with choices is that they have to be made, one can’t sit on the fence forever.
We have the technology and capability to save lives, and considering that every living creature is programmed with the instinct to continue its own existence, shouldn’t we use any and all available means in order to extend our own brief spell on this mortal coil?
I hate to say it but… is this a case where the ends justify the means?oh, I just didn’t get the whole ‘Rachel’ thing, sooorry that I don’t know the entire memberlist off by heart, thought you had split personalities or an obsession with ‘Friends’ or something
why am I thinking that you are pulling my leg on that last point? I am reffering of course to the C.U.N.T. blog
