[Man in Beds]

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

I see the government has announced they’re gonna put warnings on ciggies and alcohol in picture form…

The fags are gonna have pictures of cancerous lungs, and the beer’s gonna have pictures of fat birds.

When are they taking your photographs?

[Man in Beds]

@sharongooner wrote:

@Man in Beds wrote:

A little clip for you lot to watch and, no, it has for once nothing to do with UKPilot.

http://users.livejournal.com/_ant0n_/1478222.html

well Im not watching it then! :lol:

Suit your blimming self

[Man in Beds]

@lovely Lady wrote:

I was rolling around at that one :lol: :lol: :lol:

Dressed as a penguin?

[Man in Beds]

You just wasted 1 minute and 25 seconds of my life. For goodness sakes, post jokes, insults, pictures of your hooters but no more of that stuff.

[Man in Beds]

@toybulldog wrote:

get fooked peebles
you were so boring I had to pm both Pilot and hill to get any action

(bungee-jumps out smelling of dairy products)

UKPilot must be over the moon to have got some action at last. I bet it was the first bit of action he’s seen in yonks apart from planes taking off and landing.
Oh, and I forgot, he’s got a new anorak with an extra pocket where he keeps the pictures of all the biddies who rejected him. The pocket must be the size of a briefcase.

[Man in Beds]

@dead_on_arrvial wrote:

Have we all gone mad or just bored?

All the post just turn into “abuse” after a while but how many replys do you need before the “personal” attacks start?

Fook off, you dimwit.

[Man in Beds]

@rubyred wrote:

hell aye !!! they positively ooze of self-assured ( whether real or imagined ) smarminess. Like to remind folks they have a Degree, which somehow elevates their status,into assuming their better than everyone,and speaks the biggest load of pish.

sorry nodded off there..

A degree in what? Domestic Science?

[Man in Beds]

@*Sian wrote:

Rubes and I think so. (cliques her heals) :lol:

Can’t vote as I’ve not read any of their postings and have no intention of doing so.

[Man in Beds]

@ukpilot wrote:

Just as I said in another post Its NOT what you know (Or think You know) Its who you know.

Vampy actually thought I was Charles (PB) in forum 3 yesterday, so at a guess she’s not as perfect as she makes out.

But having said that none of you are what you aspire to be, even Pete has unnatural tendencies which best remain secret.

You are a fine one to talk about unnatural tendencies considering that you told me a number of times that my botty is yours.
Homosexuality may be legal now and I won’t hold it aginst you that you swing both way (pity you don’t swing from the neck) but it is still an unnatural tendency and not for me.

[Man in Beds]

@emmalush wrote:

@Man in Beds wrote:

@emmalush wrote:

@pete wrote:

What they take it away from police funding to hold a Sikh parade well i never and neither did they

You would think the sikh community would prefer more police on the streets than police guarding the sikh’s carrying swords illegally on the streets.

In that respect, do the sikh’s care about their religion more than everyone generally?

You, my dear, are wrongly informed and should get your facts right before posting anything on here.
Sikhs do not carry their dagger illegally on the streets. The dagger is part of their ceremonial outfit, just like the dagger the scots are wearing, and the government, in their wisdom, has decided to let them carry it to keep peace and not to appear to be discriminate against the Sikhs. They would have screamed murder if the government had allowed the jocks to wear it but not the Sikhs.

Did i say dagger??? Swords, i said

SWORDS
http://www.bbc.co.uk/leicester/content/articles/2006/04/10/vaisakhi_2006_feature.shtml

Now then :D who’s for using our taxes to fund Sikh’s carrying swords on our streets illegally, or use taxes to catch those who commit knife crime?

Sword…..just a fooking long dagger

[Author]

Posts