Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Room
@chronicle wrote:
As a frequent popper inner to the joys that is f2 i thought id give a short lighthearted view of you crazy kittens who frequent f2,
Top of the girls for me is cherrriepie whose intelligence and beauty shines through. My top guy’s in here are desmondy mellow pasty tango and warren whose wit and banter and humour shine through, who else do we have Lizie the f2 warden lovely lady, TheMaster a top bloke who i couldnt agree more with on the boards a great twisted sense of humour but all done with a good heart, A special shoutout to the sxy ladies in here Kate Eva Diva jenna Huggermuggered dubbs who are bootylicious and very sweet :wink: , who else Miss Lucy locket and taffy fish one seems to be fighting with half the room the other in my opinion is a jc bully with anyone she dosent like, both im sure are nicer in real life x samg84 another nice dull guy but a total horndog, i bet even the family cat dosent turn its back on him for fear of him pouncing. devil woman seems genuinely lovely but attracts the nutters in here.
NO OFFENCE MEANT BY ANYTHING IN THIS POST.
Nice work, stranger!
A woman walks in on her husband shagging a sheep and says “What the HELL is this?”
The man looks up casually and says “This is the pig I’ve been fùcking when you’re not here”.
His wife says, “You idiot, it’s a sheep”
The man says “I was talking to the sheep.”
:D
@gazlan wrote:
@gazlan wrote:
Meanwhile, as is shown, George Bush claims the video of Bin Laden confessing to 9/11 is without doubt infallible yet we have old Dicko telling us some years later that no proof has been established.
Can our resident ‘ debunker ‘ debunk this anomaly for us i wonder ?
AHEM !!!
Yes? <<<< Clicky!!
@gazlan wrote:
You and others can debunk as much as you will. . . Let us concentrate on the facts.
This will be a first. Go on then, I’m game.
@gazlan wrote:
The CRUCIAL evidence was removed very fast without independent scrutiny and examination.
Much of it remains. And none of it holds any evidence that this was caused by anything other than the official story.
@gazlan wrote:
The financial gain made by the owner/controller because the building’s demise was huge.
Which he must have plotted with the US government (who must’ve arranged for the aircraft jets) and then confess all on TV? Hahaha. OK, so how is he involved in the Pentagon collision and the Pennsylvania crash?
@gazlan wrote:
The official investigation failed to test for high explosives despite being requested by professionals.
As I said before, why would they test for something that couldn’t possibly be there? I used the Care Bear analogy before, so won’t do it again as it appeared the point was missed.
And, again, be honest. You would not be happy if an independent enquiry decreed that there was no explosions because “they’ve been ‘got at’ by the Government”. Sometimes you just have to let people rant and shout at the moon.
@gazlan wrote:
There’s many more that simply cannot be debunked which i will eventually list, this will give you your chance of glory ~ be patient and we will see.
Ooo, can’t wait. 8) :twisted:
@gazlan wrote:
A play on words, the building had already been cleared of fireifghters.
Choosing to ignore the obvious again? He said “pull it” on national television. If he meant, for it to be demolished, that’s his insurance claim done.
Can’t have it both ways.
Is he an insurance fraud (caught on telly too!) or are people misunderstanding what he said, (and again, I’ll remind you that no demolition company uses the words ‘pull it’ to mean what you think it means).
:D
@gazlan wrote:
Many of the people who WITNESSED explosions are clearly experienced with such events. They sound like explosions quite simply because the PROFESSIONALS say they are as well as the media, eye witnesses and fbi ahents. Don’t you believe the Govt workers?
Tell you what, YOU go into the middle of a disaster zone, escape with your life, running like hell, then have a microphone shoved in your face THEN make sense. Won’t happen.
Heat of the moment stuff.
There were NO demolition jobs on 9/11. At all.
@gazlan wrote:
Meanwhile, as is shown, George Bush claims the video of Bin Laden confessing to 9/11 is without doubt infallible yet we have old Dicko telling us some years later that no proof has been established.
Can our resident ‘ debunker ‘ debunk this anomaly for us i wonder ?
He can. :)
Now, here’s a question, similar to the one that I asked during the ‘man on the moon’ debate (which oddly, was never answered…)
How many people, conservatively, would need to have been ‘in the know’ for the events of 9/11 to have transpired how they did?
@gazlan wrote:
When is an explosion not an explosion?
The answer appears to be ~ when many professional people say they are, including firefighters and rescue workers. . . . . Funny old world aint it?
All those examples are on the day, when people were scared, confused, and in the middle of what could have been a warzone, for all they knew. Of course they’ll say ‘explosions’. Get me some CREDIBLE proof, please?
