[waspish]

@smiley wrote:

I’ve been vomiting my guts up for the past 3 days. I’ve given up drinking and I don’t take drugs anymore.. I won’t even touch painkillers. I’ve grown out of all that. So that rules out the reasons for vomiting.

But.. I have had burgers.

So… that’s kinda worrying.

dont worry mate its propably mad cow disease in your case he he he he. :lol: :lol: :lol:
hope ur all better now tho.

[waspish]

bat. thank you so much for the post in translation it realy does give you something else to take on board. it was evident to me this morning how well off the mcanns are when it showed their beautiful home on tv this morning. if indeed gerry wants a political career hes certainly gone about it in a strange way tho dont ya think ?.
im no einstein but i still cant get over the fact that kate never ever speaks out or indeed even looks the public in the eye, face to face as we say. this is a classic body language for people who have things to hide. ive seen it many times as a mental health nurse and indeed on the tv when people plead for their loved ones to come home only to be found guilty of their murder weeks on.
im not suggesting anything is wrong but to my nose something smells fishy indeed. :?

[waspish]

@ubermik wrote:

@sharongooner wrote:

Frankly Uber you have gone even lower in my estimations by trying to justify what you posted yesterday.

And even lower than that by criticising another member who dared to criticise you!

There was no justification for what you posted yesterday and I for one wont be reading anymore of your replies nor entertaining your warped mind with any replies.

I expected you to apologise for what you did, or at least carry on without trying to make light and fun out of it, not turn it on its head like its somebody elses problem for not understanding it.

Kick this guy off.

Well fiirstly you dont even know what I did “say” yesterday, you just think you do lol

Secondly, its a message board, all that are posted here are opinions, amd someones opinion of what I did or didnt say yesterday is just that, their opinion and nothing more. It doesnt carry any more or less weight than any other opinion and certainly doesnt then negate any other responses just by being posted lol, talk about delusions of adequacy or what

So as with ANY other post, once posted it is then in the public domain and is open to response to, and criticism by anyone, me included irrespective of what topic its about, what view it expresses and who posted it and also irrespective of how many agree or disagree with the point made, thats what a discussion board is goony

And despite what youre choosing to think I’m not in the slightest bit “justifying” what I posted yesterday, it was just a post and niether needs or doesnt need justification and was removed anyway making it a moot point

But, if people are going to keep whinging and whining about it on a public forum then as with any other post that catches my attention I’ll respond to it which I would do even if the post in question wasnt mine (hint discussion board ;))

And perhaps if anyone who posted had infact acurately re-iterated what was actually said in that post rather than what their limited grasp of the english language led them to think had been said I might then have been bothered to “justify” the post just for the hell of it, but its a whingefest that would even bore me Hot Chocolate trying to bicker over what you think was said even for me to waste time on

But that aside, I’m not the one “going on about it”, I’m just responding to people who are

And as their “going ons” ARE posted on threads on a board for the purpose of discussing whats posted I cant really see why you a) seem so surprised and b) think I shouldnt respond seeing as you have already said that as long as my responses were within YOUR parameters they wouldnt have been so objectionable lol, do you write your posts with everyone elses acceptability in mind or post your own views eh?

So you carry on whinging about what you think was posted and I will carry on replying re what was actually posted because it will be a cold day in hell before I kiss your ass just because you think you have some moral highground based on nothing more than an emotional response to something that wasnt what you thought it was, and as the post WAS a lighthearted one to begin with I really cant see why my tone should reflect anything else because that WOULD be “justifying” what you think the post was which is why my posts arent “justifying” it in the slightest and why there hasnt been an apology or back track on the matter to the point where apart from the obvious distress it seems to have caused it would actually have been better if the post had been locked rather than deleted (minus the pic obviously) because then you’d find it harder to cling to the delusion that it said what you think it said

actually uber i agree with you n this one as you say the message board is here for people to give their opinion. wether anyone agrees or disagrees with that opinion is neither here nor there this is a particularly distasteful subject as it involve a small child, but the truth will out in the end. i have conjected on occasion that the parents may have drugged the children ensuring a quiet night. that doesnt mean i think they either killed her or not. we can chat all day and night about it but we ae free speaking people wether anyone agrees with us or not thats a democracy.

[waspish]

@ragz67 wrote:

I was enjoying hells kitchen till the issue with brian and jim.
I heard alot of comments passing around this series , but the one that stands out is brian and the girls saying Jim Davison was “Brown Nosing” with marco, The problem is that its ok for persons to use that comment when taking about Jim but if the same was said by Jim or the others towards Brian then that can now be used as a homophobic remark because the part of the anatomy it was directed towards.
I like Brian and he is a comical man to watch, but I think he blasted jim with the homophobic and instead of understanding it was a character class they were having , the homophobic card was played and made a mountain out of a mole hill and for that I have no intentions of watching the man in the future.

And what about the old school people who do not understand why people can be gay? After all this is how they were brought up to believe and it was seen as socially unexceptable and they mainly try their hardest to understand it and I don’t believe they should be hung drawn and quartered over slipping out with a slang word that was not meant to be offensive “more just ignorance on jims part”.
Reality tv is no longer reality for no one can act themselves and I think they should be stopped for contestants sakes.
Brian if its any consolation to you, I should imagine you have put an end to Jim davisons career .
One more thing When I watched big brother with jade in and she was blasted and sentanced for her bullying which was unexceptable but the racist accusations issue was even more unexceptable and im amazed even more to see that Jermain Jackson was not pulled or thrown out of the house for the remark he made to shilpa telling her ignore them “They are white trash” your better than them

the fact is racism is a one way street. if a coloured person picks on a white person hes protecting his rights i the boots on the other foot, hes racially bullying the coloured guy. the worlds on its arse

[waspish]

@bat wrote:

Oh dear me look at this then. Just as they were getting all nicely settled in back home too. Shame.

oh my fekkin word whod av thunk it…
did little maddie wake up and stop mummy getting back to the party. or did daddy give maddie too much magic medicine. whatever next, i can see holywood doin the scripts right now :? :? :?

[waspish]

if i had to have a wedding song it would have to be run to the hills i[ron maiden] just about sums it up for me…
i love my hubby dearly but the first two were bad and badder…. ha ha ha yup ive had sex 3 times cant figure out why they both ran off with other wimmin tho :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

[waspish]

@sharongooner wrote:

What about him not liking girls either? He is just so old school and not willing to change (imo). Why was he asked to leave, and who by? Im a bit shocked at that cos I dont think he was racist or homophobic in any of his comments, just plain rude!

totally agree pet i dont think jims racist at all ive seen him live several times hes a great entertainer. but i think hes scared of brian he doesnt know what makes him tick, hes talking to a man and being answered by a 12 year old girl [in his mind i recon] and jims just not wired up for this type of person. jim is also totally mysogenistic, and who can blame him ? hes been married more times than most asylum brides and hes bin ripped off every time by his wives. [well he will go for barbie type golddiggas] I actually felt sorry for him after the outburst last nite he was totally out of his depth and im glad he was asked to leave having opinions like his is fine at home but have the sense to keep yer trap shut while on tv ffs… lookin forward to tonights episode tho.

[waspish]

from what i saw on the tv the homes are quite smart and fully equipped. im sure the people concerned will try their best to make as good a home as they can. not all council tennants are wasters living on benefits and are roundly decent people but there are always a few who spoil it, and its a shame that a lot of people lump the good and bad together. good luck to em i say. theyre gonna need it come winter when the real pikeys move in and strip the place while thet are in bed.

[waspish]

@esmeralda wrote:

@waspish wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@esmeralda wrote:

With few exceptions, you lot are the kind of sour-minded ghouls who would have been at the front of the queue to get a better look at a public execution. Shame, that the extent of your activities is limited to gleeful cyber-gloating at the tragedies and misfortunes of those failing to meet the exacting standards of your perfect selves. This forum invariably allows the likes of Bat and her ilk, to screech and holler at the latest miscreant who deserves at the very least a damn good garotting prior to getting even a whiff of judge and jury. A gaggle of haggling crones..urged on by PB’s Witchfinder General will descend on any hapless traveller veering from the path of righteousness, subjecting the opinionated scoundrel to a verbal burning at the stake whilst the hangers-on throw stones and slink about in the mud on their neanderthal hunkers.
A child has gone missing, the parents..whatever the circumstances (and I don’t for one second believe that the McCanns are in any way culpable)..will have to live the rest of their lives in despair. Show some FUC.KING compassion, you miserable shower of barstards!

Seriously tho, wanting it PROVEN the parents didnt do it IS showing compassion for the “victim”, because the victim ISNT the MCanns, its Maddy, and sparing them from scrutiny IF they did it is the complete opposite of showing compassion for the victim so until thats KNOWN they should be and should ALWAYS have been in the frame until ruled out by PROOF rather than the emotional brain washed witterings of sheep minded morons that cant comprehend that parents CAN and frequently do subject their kids to harm or death

As for the “perfect standards” dross, I really dont think that NOT leaving three kids under four alone is really “perfection”, its more of a very VERY basic baseline that SHOULD be expeted of every single parent the world over rather than some high exacting expectation that should be seen as nice if it happens but no big deal if someone cant be bothered to actually be a parent to their kids

And its exactly that wishy washy pathetic view that it ISNT a big deal doing such things that encourages people like the Mcanns to do so in the first place combined with the frequency at which the touchy strokey mob will want them to escape without punishment if something bad does happen

make fun of how distraught the parents are, they are directly culpable for their childs death and should be held accountable as an example to other people who think its ok to take such irresponsible risks with their kids lives for such trivial selfish pursuits, because we dont KNOW they will feel even the slightest bit of remorse do we? So that alone cant be assumed or taken as ALL the punishment they live, that kind of pathetic assumption is worthless and could just as easily be applied to anyone who has deliberately killed their own kids too couldnt it?

But I am getting sick to death of socially accepted or professionally presented sob stories gaining scrotes absolution from the responsibility of their crimes from the hoody happy slapping murderer who never had a playstation and whos father wasnt around all the way up to this crap with the crappy selfish parents who are to be expected to feel grief rather than relief if allowed to continue their charmed luxurious lifestyle rather than being held responsible for their actions

Many people ARE jailed each year for committing crimes with GENUINE reasons like stopping their kids going hungry because they have no money, yet so many want these people who niether have a decent reason for leaving their kids alone nor lacked the funds to have arranged for some proper care for them to be let off scott free in the hopes they MIGHT feel a little bit bad about it at some undisclosed point in the future

make fun of em, they are the spokespeople for just how pathetically self absorbed and half assed the standard of parenting is becoming in the UK, kids arent fashion items to be discarded when they are inconvenient. They are a parents primary consideration and a responsibility they should shoulder fully and that message needs to be sent out with every instance of the opposite irrespective of the poor ickle feelings of the tossers that cant be bothered to make at least some attempt at keeping their kids safe for absolutely no good reason

Why not try and show compassion for all the kids that will be more likely to be put in the same danger if the majority of public opinion condones this action by wanting the parents spared any more grief, because that IS what the long term results of such a viewpoint will be which is clear to anyone who ISNT a neanderthol mamby pamby sob story worshipping victim stroker

We’ve been far too soft on far too many people for far too long, so make fun of em. You CHOOSE to take an action then you make fun of well also CHOOSE to reap the ramifications of that action, its called responsibility and we as a society already HAVE a responsibility to deter parents from taking needless unnecessary risks with their kids lives, the responsibility it to the kids, not the parents

wow dude youre cool at times well written i totally agree. :shock: :shock: :shock:

And the crones start to regroup, wielding pitchforks and bibles..as…

…JC’ers enjoy a reet good day out!!!

haha ha lmfao :lol: :lol: :lol: avent seen a gud tarrin n featherin for a week or 2 think of it

[waspish]

@ubermik wrote:

@esmeralda wrote:

With few exceptions, you lot are the kind of sour-minded ghouls who would have been at the front of the queue to get a better look at a public execution. Shame, that the extent of your activities is limited to gleeful cyber-gloating at the tragedies and misfortunes of those failing to meet the exacting standards of your perfect selves. This forum invariably allows the likes of Bat and her ilk, to screech and holler at the latest miscreant who deserves at the very least a damn good garotting prior to getting even a whiff of judge and jury. A gaggle of haggling crones..urged on by PB’s Witchfinder General will descend on any hapless traveller veering from the path of righteousness, subjecting the opinionated scoundrel to a verbal burning at the stake whilst the hangers-on throw stones and slink about in the mud on their neanderthal hunkers.
A child has gone missing, the parents..whatever the circumstances (and I don’t for one second believe that the McCanns are in any way culpable)..will have to live the rest of their lives in despair. Show some FUC.KING compassion, you miserable shower of barstards!

Seriously tho, wanting it PROVEN the parents didnt do it IS showing compassion for the “victim”, because the victim ISNT the MCanns, its Maddy, and sparing them from scrutiny IF they did it is the complete opposite of showing compassion for the victim so until thats KNOWN they should be and should ALWAYS have been in the frame until ruled out by PROOF rather than the emotional brain washed witterings of sheep minded morons that cant comprehend that parents CAN and frequently do subject their kids to harm or death

As for the “perfect standards” dross, I really dont think that NOT leaving three kids under four alone is really “perfection”, its more of a very VERY basic baseline that SHOULD be expeted of every single parent the world over rather than some high exacting expectation that should be seen as nice if it happens but no big deal if someone cant be bothered to actually be a parent to their kids

And its exactly that wishy washy pathetic view that it ISNT a big deal doing such things that encourages people like the Mcanns to do so in the first place combined with the frequency at which the touchy strokey mob will want them to escape without punishment if something bad does happen

make fun of how distraught the parents are, they are directly culpable for their childs death and should be held accountable as an example to other people who think its ok to take such irresponsible risks with their kids lives for such trivial selfish pursuits, because we dont KNOW they will feel even the slightest bit of remorse do we? So that alone cant be assumed or taken as ALL the punishment they live, that kind of pathetic assumption is worthless and could just as easily be applied to anyone who has deliberately killed their own kids too couldnt it?

But I am getting sick to death of socially accepted or professionally presented sob stories gaining scrotes absolution from the responsibility of their crimes from the hoody happy slapping murderer who never had a playstation and whos father wasnt around all the way up to this crap with the crappy selfish parents who are to be expected to feel grief rather than relief if allowed to continue their charmed luxurious lifestyle rather than being held responsible for their actions

Many people ARE jailed each year for committing crimes with GENUINE reasons like stopping their kids going hungry because they have no money, yet so many want these people who niether have a decent reason for leaving their kids alone nor lacked the funds to have arranged for some proper care for them to be let off scott free in the hopes they MIGHT feel a little bit bad about it at some undisclosed point in the future

make fun of em, they are the spokespeople for just how pathetically self absorbed and half assed the standard of parenting is becoming in the UK, kids arent fashion items to be discarded when they are inconvenient. They are a parents primary consideration and a responsibility they should shoulder fully and that message needs to be sent out with every instance of the opposite irrespective of the poor ickle feelings of the tossers that cant be bothered to make at least some attempt at keeping their kids safe for absolutely no good reason

Why not try and show compassion for all the kids that will be more likely to be put in the same danger if the majority of public opinion condones this action by wanting the parents spared any more grief, because that IS what the long term results of such a viewpoint will be which is clear to anyone who ISNT a neanderthol mamby pamby sob story worshipping victim stroker

We’ve been far too soft on far too many people for far too long, so make fun of em. You CHOOSE to take an action then you make fun of well also CHOOSE to reap the ramifications of that action, its called responsibility and we as a society already HAVE a responsibility to deter parents from taking needless unnecessary risks with their kids lives, the responsibility it to the kids, not the parents

wow dude youre cool at times well written i totally agree. :shock: :shock: :shock:

[Author]

Posts