Mc Canns are being framed

Well, take a look at this article then from the El Pais newspaper.
Today El Pais newspaper printed an article about how the McCann social status in the UK prevented the work of the Portuguese police investigation what happened to the girl. They say even though UK government is denying intervening in the case both the government and the press took a part of it from the very first minute. Kate McCann apparently called Sky news before calling the police. They also say the British press have done a lot of damage to the investigation by triggering false leads about the girls whereabout.

The article is very interesting because it also makes an account of how the campaign was mastered by Gerry McCann and Clarence Mitchell, a British communications expert sent by the Foreign Office to advice Maddie’s parents. According to the newspaper Gerry McCann has been lobbying to be named Minister of Health, hence the help he has been getting to put up a campaign of such proportions. They’re good friends with the actual Prime Minister. This has also triggered some of the police suspicions that they had something to do with the girl disappearance, because they had a lot to lose. Also, they say that kids vanishing from occupied buildings is unheard of. They say that doesn’t happen. Even the Scotland Yard agrees with it.

The Portuguese police assures everything seemed wrong and fishy since the very first minute they arrived at the scene. They say Kate McCann told them the girl was abducted from a window. When they went checking it turned out that window was broken from inside the room, and not outside, that whoever came into the apartment didn’t do it through the window. And that is when Gerry MCann said the door was unlocked.

Also, Kate McCann has been saying they called the police ten minutes upon learning the girl had vanished. But when the police arrived at the scene, a journalist from Sky News was already there. The press had been called half an hour before the police were. (Sky news apparently has correspondents stationed in Portugal). They also say the parent’s story about going to check on the kids every half hour is not true. The waiter and other employees of the restaurant where they were dining denied it.

They also say Public Opinion in the UK is now doubting the McCann’s story and questioning the UK government for giving far too much help to one family while ignoring thousands of other missing children.
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.elpais.com/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Del%2Bpais%2Bnewspaper%26hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1T4GGLR_enGB210GB210

ffs finally got the link in English now.

@ubermik wrote:

@sharongooner wrote:

Frankly Uber you have gone even lower in my estimations by trying to justify what you posted yesterday.

And even lower than that by criticising another member who dared to criticise you!

There was no justification for what you posted yesterday and I for one wont be reading anymore of your replies nor entertaining your warped mind with any replies.

I expected you to apologise for what you did, or at least carry on without trying to make light and fun out of it, not turn it on its head like its somebody elses problem for not understanding it.

Kick this guy off.

Well fiirstly you dont even know what I did “say” yesterday, you just think you do lol

Secondly, its a message board, all that are posted here are opinions, amd someones opinion of what I did or didnt say yesterday is just that, their opinion and nothing more. It doesnt carry any more or less weight than any other opinion and certainly doesnt then negate any other responses just by being posted lol, talk about delusions of adequacy or what

So as with ANY other post, once posted it is then in the public domain and is open to response to, and criticism by anyone, me included irrespective of what topic its about, what view it expresses and who posted it and also irrespective of how many agree or disagree with the point made, thats what a discussion board is goony

And despite what youre choosing to think I’m not in the slightest bit “justifying” what I posted yesterday, it was just a post and niether needs or doesnt need justification and was removed anyway making it a moot point

But, if people are going to keep whinging and whining about it on a public forum then as with any other post that catches my attention I’ll respond to it which I would do even if the post in question wasnt mine (hint discussion board ;))

And perhaps if anyone who posted had infact acurately re-iterated what was actually said in that post rather than what their limited grasp of the english language led them to think had been said I might then have been bothered to “justify” the post just for the hell of it, but its a whingefest that would even bore me Hot Chocolate trying to bicker over what you think was said even for me to waste time on

But that aside, I’m not the one “going on about it”, I’m just responding to people who are

And as their “going ons” ARE posted on threads on a board for the purpose of discussing whats posted I cant really see why you a) seem so surprised and b) think I shouldnt respond seeing as you have already said that as long as my responses were within YOUR parameters they wouldnt have been so objectionable lol, do you write your posts with everyone elses acceptability in mind or post your own views eh?

So you carry on whinging about what you think was posted and I will carry on replying re what was actually posted because it will be a cold day in hell before I kiss your ass just because you think you have some moral highground based on nothing more than an emotional response to something that wasnt what you thought it was, and as the post WAS a lighthearted one to begin with I really cant see why my tone should reflect anything else because that WOULD be “justifying” what you think the post was which is why my posts arent “justifying” it in the slightest and why there hasnt been an apology or back track on the matter to the point where apart from the obvious distress it seems to have caused it would actually have been better if the post had been locked rather than deleted (minus the pic obviously) because then you’d find it harder to cling to the delusion that it said what you think it said

actually uber i agree with you n this one as you say the message board is here for people to give their opinion. wether anyone agrees or disagrees with that opinion is neither here nor there this is a particularly distasteful subject as it involve a small child, but the truth will out in the end. i have conjected on occasion that the parents may have drugged the children ensuring a quiet night. that doesnt mean i think they either killed her or not. we can chat all day and night about it but we ae free speaking people wether anyone agrees with us or not thats a democracy.

@waspish wrote:

bat. thank you so much for the post in translation it realy does give you something else to take on board. it was evident to me this morning how well off the mcanns are when it showed their beautiful home on tv this morning. if indeed gerry wants a political career hes certainly gone about it in a strange way tho dont ya think ?.
im no einstein but i still cant get over the fact that kate never ever speaks out or indeed even looks the public in the eye, face to face as we say. this is a classic body language for people who have things to hide. ive seen it many times as a mental health nurse and indeed on the tv when people plead for their loved ones to come home only to be found guilty of their murder weeks on.
im not suggesting anything is wrong but to my nose something smells fishy indeed. :?

But the fishy smell might just be because portugal is a hot country with poor plumbing and Kate Macann jogged most mornings and might not have always showered afterwards :lol:

@fastcars wrote:

@ubermik wrote:

@~Pebbles~ wrote:

Uber you lost your right to criticise anyones comments on here after your disgusting comments yesterday

PMSL, obviously not or you wouldnt have had a post to respond to now would ya duhbrain

And as for “disgusting comments”, disgusting is a subjective and personal definition, not an objective nor univeral one, just because you were too dimwitted to understand what I did or didnt say in the “disgusting” post niether makes it disgusting by definition nor relevant to any other post I may write

thats the nature of a “right” petal, some of your posts have totally lacked any form of cohesion, grasp of the gramatical technicalities of english not even the faintest glimmer of logic, but that also doesnt remove your “right” to post even more eroneous illogical dross does it? Or do you think your in someway “special” in a different way to the one that gets you a carer to wipe your drool and tie your laces for you?

But just to clarify that, if you said “boobs” and I said that was a “disgusting comment” would you agree? Would your agreement or disagreement have any validity? Would my initial opinion on its “disgustingness” have any relevance? The answer to all of those is a quite resounding NO!

So firstly I couldnt really give a flying penetrative gesture what your opinion of the joke yesterday was as your opinion is about as relveant and important to me as people starving in africa or whether the queen wakes up tomorrow, IE not in the slightest, its ONLY important to you

If you dont have an actual valid sensible response to a post try either just stating that and conceeding the point or saying nothing, coz calling the poster a poo poo face or other names just makes you look like a twonk luv

Your post was sick…. your attempts at condoning your actions are nothing short of repulsive.

Which is simply your opinion, and as such is irrelevant and worthless outside of your own little world and carries no weight whatsoever in mine and no amount of repeated whinging about it will alter that

@bat wrote:

Well, take a look at this article then from the El Pais newspaper.
Today El Pais newspaper printed an article about how the McCann social status in the UK prevented the work of the Portuguese police investigation what happened to the girl. They say even though UK government is denying intervening in the case both the government and the press took a part of it from the very first minute. Kate McCann apparently called Sky news before calling the police. They also say the British press have done a lot of damage to the investigation by triggering false leads about the girls whereabout.

The article is very interesting because it also makes an account of how the campaign was mastered by Gerry McCann and Clarence Mitchell, a British communications expert sent by the Foreign Office to advice Maddie’s parents. According to the newspaper Gerry McCann has been lobbying to be named Minister of Health, hence the help he has been getting to put up a campaign of such proportions. They’re good friends with the actual Prime Minister. This has also triggered some of the police suspicions that they had something to do with the girl disappearance, because they had a lot to lose. Also, they say that kids vanishing from occupied buildings is unheard of. They say that doesn’t happen. Even the Scotland Yard agrees with it.

The Portuguese police assures everything seemed wrong and fishy since the very first minute they arrived at the scene. They say Kate McCann told them the girl was abducted from a window. When they went checking it turned out that window was broken from inside the room, and not outside, that whoever came into the apartment didn’t do it through the window. And that is when Gerry MCann said the door was unlocked.

Also, Kate McCann has been saying they called the police ten minutes upon learning the girl had vanished. But when the police arrived at the scene, a journalist from Sky News was already there. The press had been called half an hour before the police were. (Sky news apparently has correspondents stationed in Portugal). They also say the parent’s story about going to check on the kids every half hour is not true. The waiter and other employees of the restaurant where they were dining denied it.

They also say Public Opinion in the UK is now doubting the McCann’s story and questioning the UK government for giving far too much help to one family while ignoring thousands of other missing children.
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&u=http://www.elpais.com/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Del%2Bpais%2Bnewspaper%26hl%3Den%26rlz%3D1T4GGLR_enGB210GB210

ffs finally got the link in English now.

Certainly something fishy about this drivel.
Social Status? He’s a 70k a year Quake. She’s a 45k a year part time GP. Sure it’s more than the average Joe makes, but it hardly makes them the Queen and Duke of Edinburgh.

As far as I know to even to be considered for Minister of Toilet Paper you have to be an active MP. Good friends with the actual Prime Minister my ar/se. Shi.te, sh.ite, shi.te. You’ll be telling us that Elvis is working down the local Tescos next.