Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #17144

    A government review today insisted British women do not routinely need to have the controversial PIP Breast implants removed, The review was commissioned as some implants have ruptured causing health problems. France has already offered removal free to women due to the high risk of them rupturing.

    The NHS will pay for women who had the implants fitted by the health service and who are anxious to have them removed.

    My question is this…. should the British taxpayer pay for the removal of breast implants to women who paid for them privately purely for aesthetic reasons?

    My thought is no…. if they could afford to have them done then they should be responsible for their removal….. nothing is ever that simple though is it?

    Should the taxpayer pick up the tab?… also be aware lots of the clinics involved have now disappeared… closed down or simply moved on…. so whats the answer?

    #487470

    Firstly not everyone who had them done privately had them done for vanity. Two of my friends are quite concerned at the moment, they had reconstruction after breast cancer and have been told it’s possible they may have had PIP implants. Both were treated under private medical insurance that they had at the time, therefore aren’t covered by the rules for removal by the NHS. They’re waiting to hear what action the hospitals that they were treated at proposes but one thing is for sure, the solution offered may or may not be done at a reduced cost but it is unlikely to be done for free.

    For those that did have it done for aesthetic reasons, well they could afford to have them done at the time but can they afford to have them removed? Should there be means testing so that those that can afford it pay for it themselves and those that can’t can have it done under the NHS? Surely means testing goes against what the NHS is supposed to stand for though, i.e. health care for all.

    If women are forced to keep implants that may rupture and cause cancer because they can’t afford to have them removed, the cost of the cancer treatment would be far more than the cost of removal. To deny them the opportunity to have them removed and leaving them to worry about their future health would effectively be punishing them for their vanity. That would be cruel.

    Not a decision I would want to have to make, especially in the current climate.

    #487471

    terrible state of affairs i agree
    but im fed up with the tv and papers being full of it

    #487472

    you had your moods done then grinch :lol:

    #487473

    @mrs_teapot wrote:

    My question is this…. should the British taxpayer pay for the removal of breast implants to women who paid for them privately purely for aesthetic reasons?

    My thought is no…. if they could afford to have them done then they should be responsible for their removal….. nothing is ever that simple though is it?

    Should the taxpayer pick up the tab?… also be aware lots of the clinics involved have now disappeared… closed down or simply moved on…. so whats the answer?

    #487474

    Joker submitted a picture which I quoted on… asking if he had permission to post it… I have no idea who the picture was of….he eventually deleted it. Luckily someone here alerted me and I deleted it from my quote as soon as I knew.

    #487475

    i also thought it was a thread about our pip but clearly not
    so if you dont mind i wont get involved in this thread
    as i havent got a fckn clue what you are going on about.

    #487476

    Jesus!

    I thought our Pip was getting breast implants for a minute!

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

Get involved in this discussion! Log in or register now to have your say!