Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
21 September, 2006 at 11:37 pm #237507
As far as I know in the UK Drivel there’ something called “Probable Cause”.
Maybe there isnt a need for Probable cause in the Quasi Nazi State that you fantasise about.21 September, 2006 at 7:54 pm #237504I was actually gonna mention that kind of thing Sharon. What if someone spits somewhere, and that place later becomes a crime scene.
20 September, 2006 at 3:55 pm #242104Great stuff from the Old Boy.
20 September, 2006 at 3:47 pm #241724Ok Mate. Here’s the link.
20 September, 2006 at 3:43 pm #241723It really doesnt matter what kind of damage WTC7 had. (in fact it had only had a few small fires)
WTC7 didnt fall because of any damage that it had, because it had relatively little.
The Owner of the building said on Television that they had decided to implode it. I’m gonna believe him since he actually said it.20 September, 2006 at 3:13 pm #241721@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
September 11 conspiracies are just nonsense put forward by people who want attention, or who want to sell books. It’s ludicrous to suggest that it was an inside job. Yes there have been dirty operations carried out by various governments around the world where attacks were inside jobs but nothing on this scale. Also, you wouldn’t partly destroy your own military HQ if the dirty operation was aimed at allowing your military to go on the attack. So, it’s clear that no rational person would believe the 9/11 conspiracy theories.
I’ve never said on this thread it was an inside job. Only that they knew it was coming, and didnt do anything about it. Since they recieved 13 warnings, some pinpointing where it was actually gonna occur, and the names of some of the people who were gonna be involved in it. Security was never stepped up, and it was never discussed.
What I said in that last paragraph is a fact not a theory. If I’ve said something in that paragrpah that isnt common knowledge or that can be argued against someone point out where I said something infactual?
20 September, 2006 at 3:05 pm #241720@drivel wrote:
@Bad Manners wrote:
@drivel wrote:
I still can’t honeslty believe Bass and BM cranking on about conspiracy theories ffs
you say the public are gullible – how gullible are you to conspiracy shyte
and Bass – you say it was the first time fore has brought down a metal framed building – ffs how many buildings have had a plane crash into them
Listen to yourselves please
They were actually designed to withstand attack’s from the air Drivel.
Yea righto – like anything with windows is going to withstand a passenger plane flying into it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I say AGAIN these Towers were desinged to withstand attacks from the air.
What most people dont know is that WTC7, which was half the size of it’s Big Brother’s also collapsed at 5.00pm that afternoon. This building was never hit by Planes, and had little structural damage.
The owner of the bulding gave an interview on TV in which he told how they had decided to “pull it” (ie-implode it) to avoid further loss of life.
Only problem is that the planning and execution of these implusions take weeks and sometimes months to plan and execute. They are done by highly trained specialists after a lot of planning. No one knows to this day how this was accomplished.19 September, 2006 at 11:39 pm #241804Commiserations on being stuck with Tiggy for the rest of your life.
19 September, 2006 at 10:35 pm #241716@drivel wrote:
I still can’t honeslty believe Bass and BM cranking on about conspiracy theories ffs
you say the public are gullible – how gullible are you to conspiracy shyte
and Bass – you say it was the first time fore has brought down a metal framed building – ffs how many buildings have had a plane crash into them
Listen to yourselves please
They were actually designed to withstand attack’s from the air Drivel.
19 September, 2006 at 10:33 pm #241715Dont be gullible all your life Drivel. :D
-
AuthorPosts
