Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
It dosent really matter. If there is an afterlife then great. If not you’ll never know that there wasnt as you’ll just blink out of exsistence.
As I get older I just feel that there’s something more to it. A lot of things are just too complicated to be random.I used to think it was a load of nonsense. I still do I guess, but I dont see any other rational explantion of why were here. It’s fine to say the idea of God is nonsense, but to say that you have to have a logical alternative explanation, and as far as I know there isnt one.
Something brought the Universe into existence. As far as I know a Universe cant will itself into existence. The Universe has only existed for 10 billion years. If the Universe had always existed then the idea of God would lose points, but it hasnt always existed.
Something had to happen to bring something to absolute nothingness. The Big Bang theory suggests that an Atom created the Universe, but the Atom had to come from somewhere.
Therefore in the absense of any other explantion God is as good a theory as anything.
If there is a God and he willed a Universe into existence, I dont think raising a few trillion dead bodies would be too hard for him.There’s a huge difference between Agassi winning tournaments in his 30’s and Henman possibly winning one in his 30’s. Henman was never anywhere near Agassi’s class. Im not having a go at Henman here, as Agassi was one of the finest Tennis players of all time.
PS-Dont write Monty off yet. He almost snatched a Major the other week. He could a contender for the Open.
Murray might have to wait a few years to have a real chance at Wimbeldon. Im sure he’d be glad to just get past a few rounds this year.
To be fair to Henman he’s been a good player. I think his chance at Wimbeldon has passed now he’s moved into his 30’s.Oi, I’ve got Ukraine left as well.
You didnt say Australia though. You said Ghana. lol
@emmalush wrote:
@Bad Manners wrote:
Who said he was representing England at tennis Emma? :? Certainly not me. I said he was representing Great Britain.
How could he not complain if he received boos at Wimbeldon. Im sure he wouldent care if a bunch of middle class twa.ts booed him anyway.:roll: And England’s not in GB :D
Oh right, so now English middle classes are tw.ats, but murray isnt then?
But he couldnt complain without looking stupid. He would look a total idiot, bemused by his own stupidity.
Hes young, and has a lot to learn.
I think he was advised to say “anyone but England”, because that would “promote” his profile. He was ill advised.
If not, he wanted to jump on the scottish anti-English bandwagon and gain support.
Alot of scots do hate the English.
Come on Tim, WUP that dirty foreigner murray.
If Kim Henman didnt win Wimbeldon in his prime, he never will.
Andy Murray is a young man who made a rash comment that’s all.@emmalush wrote:
@Bad Manners wrote:
Murray’s represting Great Britain.
:roll:
How can a scotsman who wants anyone but England to win the world cup, represent England at tennis?
He couldnt complain if he recieved boos at Wimbledon.
Who said he was representing England at tennis Emma? :? Certainly not me. I said he was representing Great Britain.
How could he not complain if he received boos at Wimbeldon. Im sure he wouldent care if a bunch of middle class twa.ts booed him anyway.@emmalush wrote:
@Magoo wrote:
However good luck to Murray, I don’t think he’s quite the finished article yet, but give him a year or two and he may be the great tennis hope the whole of the UK has been looking for!
The whole of the uk :?
Im not a scottish hater BM. If its ok to say “anyone but England (for the world cup), then its ok to say anyone but murray.
Murray’s represting Great Britain.
There’s no way it denied Ghana the chance to progress. I felt Brazil could have moved up another few gears anytime they wanted to.
To be honest it would be a better spectacle seeing Brazil playing England in the semi’s than Brazil-Portugal.
