Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
4 April, 2008 at 5:47 pm #317678
It’s hugely important not to concede at home in Europe. I think all the clubs in the other games conceded away goals.
Sporting arent any better than the team Rangers beat in the last round with an away goal. (cant remember who it was).
4 April, 2008 at 10:04 am #317674Yeah, an away goal will win it I think. Cant see Sporting scoring 2.
3 April, 2008 at 5:08 pm #322524@rainbowbrite wrote:
Snobs! I dont care if she has sixteen children by twelve fathers, if that child is cared for properly then class is not an issue. If the child is fed, watered and clothed properly i dont care how intelligent the family is. Of course this story is not of the ordinary. I strongly believe that Shannon (Note not Sharon :wink: ) was taken in by her Uncle due to her being too upset to go home. Who would want to go home to a man which stores child cuddles and hugs on their computer. Did her Uncle point the police in the right direction for a more lenient sentence. (Lets face it – he’s going down no matter what he thinks).
As someone has said already, if Shannon was in trouble and he knew it – why didnt he just contact the police to put her in care? But then again is that what Shannon wants? Wouldn’t a young girl just want her Mummy back even if it means going back to him? Oh and at that age who knows if she felt she had a strong enough voice to tell her Mum that the step-dad/kiddy fiddler from hell made her feel awkward – please get rid of him. Her mum loves him so why would she be believed. Of course adults would know better…its a childs eye view we have to take.
I’m guessing the girl didnt know he had Child Porn on his comp, so I doubt this was the reason for her not wanting to go home.
I’d also imagine it’s standard procedure in this type of case to take Computers to look for leads, so I doubt anyone would have had to point anyone in the right direction.
3 April, 2008 at 4:22 pm #322521@dead_on_arrvial wrote:
Well cath I think there a big differents between down loading pictures and the dirty sods that hang around in chatrooms looking for kids to “meet “ .
Actvily seeking out children for s ex is far worst than looking at a few pictures.
If we was to start banning all pictures of naked chilren we would have to close down most of our churchs and make a few changes to our grave yards.
PB is right about removing files from your computers, its not simple, that’s why you always have to take out your hard drive on your computer before you throw it always and smash it up with a hammer.
But I still can’t understand why Craig Meehan just didn’t do more to cover this tracts once the police were involed. No one is that dumb, the police don’t just pop round in 5 mins after a child has gone missing and go thru the house, he had plenty of time to removed anything that shouldn’t have been on this computer.
Has for Miss Matthews, she is just one of the many people in life who spend their days doing nothing and living off the state.
I know PB may find this hard to beleave, but there are many people like Miss Mattews using this site, picking up with younger men and doing the same thing.
“Attractive is something we don’t do, easy and drunk we do well.”
Is Craig Meehan a victim of this plot too? Why did a 17 year old move into a house with a women twice this age?
I have a nasty feeling this case is far from over and we will see more family members being arrested soon, my money is on Miss Matthews.
You dont have to smash hard drives with Hammer’s. DBAN’s all you need.
3 April, 2008 at 4:11 pm #322819It’s basically still a genetic woman though, with the pair of tit/s removed and a beard.
3 April, 2008 at 1:16 am #322511@forumhostpb wrote:
I agree Waspish – it is a puzzle eh? Apparently little 9 year old Sharon was found by Police hidden inside a closed drawer that was part of a bed. It’s difficult to see quite how (or indeed why) she should go there unaided.
I did read briefly that the “Uncle” was also similarly hiding – but I am not sure of all the details on this particular point – it was only briefly mentioned in the Press.
As for the child porn stuff on the stepfather’s computer ….. it is possible that it was old porn, put there by a previous owner. However, a brief analysis of the disk and child porn files will rapidly disclose the dates on which they wree created and it is then a simple matter to ascertain when the current owner had possession of it (or access to it).
Also, and as I suspect DOA knows already, simply deleting files and emptying the recycle bin does not actually remove data from a computer’s hard disk. It merely places them onto an unused area of the disk where they can be overwritten by newer files, over time.
It is a relatively simple process to recover these files from the hard disk, provided that haven’t been overwritten too many times.
I think DOA might mean programs like DBAN which Nuke the Hard Drive.
2 April, 2008 at 4:14 pm #322614My money would be on Liverpool going though over two legs.
In fact I would’nt bet against them winning it again.
2 April, 2008 at 3:49 pm #322499:lol: One phone call to the Police would have done it, without going to the extraordinary length of kidnap to protect her.
Your logic needs some work Wasp.
31 March, 2008 at 11:40 pm #281712@*Sian wrote:
Town Called Malice. 8)
No it isnt you daft bint. =; It’s “Witey Riddem” and he’s making my ears hurt real bad.
31 March, 2008 at 12:04 pm #281709Style Council-Walls Come Tumbling Down
-
AuthorPosts
