Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@pete wrote:
@bat wrote:
@pete wrote:
They have to batty or die it’s that simple
But pete they have had millions of pounds chucked at them over the years and they still die. I don,t know what the hell the answer is, but having more children that they can,t feed doesn,t help them really does it? The site of those pitiful children is heartbreaking. Makes you realise how lucky we are in the UK.
they dont show the adults dying though Batty we wouldnt send as much money. It’s climate and the more kids they have the more will survive and the longer they’ll live. We cant control the weather but if we can at least give them clean water and help when the climate is such that the crop fails is that too much to ask
No of course it isn,t too much to ask pete. I didn,t mean to suggest that they recieve no financial aid atall, it,s just that it doesn,t seem to be doing any good. Those adverts on the tell really tug at your heart strings. They always seem to come on at tea time too, Makes me feel guilty as hell.
@pete wrote:
They have to batty or die it’s that simple
But pete they have had millions of pounds chucked at them over the years and they still die. I don,t know what the hell the answer is, but having more children that they can,t feed doesn,t help them really does it? The site of those pitiful children is heartbreaking. Makes you realise how lucky we are in the UK.
@pats wrote:
@pete wrote:
So you’d have them starve to death cause they cant grow food or die of thirst cause theyre too infirm to fetch water. Birth control is the last thing they need
ok i give in. keep throwing money at em…….while they keep producing kids they cant feed or keep healthy. after all it isnt their fault is it. :roll: :roll: :roll:
I agree with you there PATS. These third world countries can hardly feed themselves, yet they keep having zillions of kids. Why can,t these charities dish out condoms? We can chuck money at them until the cows come home but as long as they keep having kids, nothing will change. Live Aid didn,t make much difference did it?
I agree with you pebbles. I havn,t clicked on any of the links and I,m not going too. The mere thought of it is enough to make my blood boil. How anyone can do something like that to a defenceless animal is just beyond me. Sick doesn,t come close. :evil:
The amount of packaging in stuff you buy from supermarkets. I must have chucked tons of the stuff away just so I get the food I,d bought into the freezer. :evil:
@Bad Manners wrote:
Maybe in Cloud Cukoo Land… Back on Planet Reality if the Cops from a foreign country with a history of corruption, are asking questions about whether you killed your Daughter, and are trying to railroad you into a confession, then you’re gonna be very careful what you say.
BM all she had to do was answer “No I did not kill my daughter”. I mean she has nothing to hide………….right? So whats the problem?
@cherry Coke wrote:
Kate chooses to remain silent, I agree with bat. You would think the mother of a missing child would be willing to answer any questions thrown at her, dispite what solicitors have advised.
Thank you Cherry. That was exactly my point. If I had been Kate, I would have happily answered all their questions a million times, if it would help to find my child. These two said from the start they would leave no stone unturned and would fully cooperate with police enquiries, so why wouldn,t she answer the questions?
As to this latest alleged sighting of maddie in Amsterdam, I find it hard to beleive that any abductor would parade a child they had taken, around in full daylight, in a shop with ccctv.
And cath I too often wonder what became of Ben Needham.
@pete wrote:
The Oscar-winning actor was in “good spirits” in hospital after breaking his arm and elbow in the crash, his spokesman said.
:shock:
How the hell can anyone possibly be in good spirits when they,ve just broken their arm?? ffs. :roll:
He concluded:”While it is a fact that Madeleine disappeared from the Ocean Club apartment, the circumstances and manner of how this happened is not known.”
The circumstances in which Maddie vanished were created by her irresponsible useless parents. An unlocked apartment makes ideal circumstances doesn,t it?
Whatever DID happen to Maddie, happend because those two incompetent prats thought more about their own pleasure than the saftey and wellbeing of their children. They arn,t fit to have goldfish. :roll:
@Bad Manners wrote:
We can always rely on Bat to jump right in with her trademark :roll:
Here’s an article from the Daily Mirror detailing the vile tactics that the Portugese Police used-
Police ignored expert advice that DNA did NOT link Kate and Gerry McCann to their daughter Madeleine’s disappearance, it emerged yesterday.
In an email, British scientist John Lowe told Portuguese investigators that the evidence found in the couple’s hired car was “inconclusive”.
Yet 48 hours later in a tough grilling bullying cops told the McCanns the traces DID come from Madeleine.
And two days after that the couple were made formal suspects, with police citing the DNA evidence as the reason
Now, the McCanns are asking why they came under suspicion when investigators already knew the “evidence” against them was deeply flawed.
The revelations came to light as prosecutors released 30,000 pages of case files following the shelving of the case two weeks ago.
Included are witness statements, transcripts of interviews with Kate and Gerry, details of lines of inquiry and pictures of Madeleine’s bedroom taken just hours after she vanished.
Also listed are 48 questions Kate, 40, did not answer. As the bullying probe intensified, Kate wisely used her rights to stay silent.
Among the notes is the email from John Lowe, of the Forensic Science Service, referring to DNA found in the boot of a Renault Scenic the McCanns hired after Madeleine vanished. He told UK police on September 3: “Let’s look at the question ‘Is there DNA from Madeleine on the swab?’ “It would be very simple to say ‘Yes’ because of the components within the result that are also in her sample.
“What we need to consider is whether the match is genuine because Madeleine deposited DNA in the car, or whether Madeleine appears to match the result by chance.”
Mr Lowe said some components in Madeleine’s profile were not unique to her. Some were even present among FSS scientists, including himself. He concluded: “We cannot answer the question: Is the match genuine, or is it a chance match?”
The email was translated into Portuguese on September 4.
On September 7, Gerry was questioned. The dossier reveals that in an eight-hour quiz he was told Madeleine’s DNA was found in the Renault boot.
He was also told traces were found behind a sofa in the family’s holiday apartment at Praia da Luz from where Madeleine vanished on May 3 last year.
The notes said: “Confronted with the fact that Madeleine’s DNA was gathered from behind the sofa and from the boot, and analysed by a British lab, he said he could not explain why.”
Gerry, 40, was asked: “Did you have any responsibility or intervention in your daughter’s disappearance?”
An officer’s notes say only that he categorically denied such a suggestion.
The notes go on: “He said that from the very start he thought that Madeleine had been abducted. He reached that conclusion because he did not think it was possible for her to have walked out or opened the shutter herself.”
Gerry denied suggestions that Kate was depressed or that their children – three-year-old Madeleine and twins Sean and Amelie, then two – were on medication.
Lawyers for the McCanns, of Rothley, Leics, were formally given access to the files last week. They continue to study the dossier for fresh leads that the couple’s private detectives can follow.
McCann spokesman Clarence Mitchell said: “The Portuguese Attorney General made it very clear that there’s absolutely no evidence of any wrongdoing by Kate and Gerry.
“A lot of this is historical detail drafted by officers who failed to find Madeleine and who quite wrongfully were going down inaccurate lines of supposition and assumption.”
Last month, Portugal’s law chief halted the investigation because there was no evidence of a crime.
The McCanns and expat Robert Murat, 34, were told they were no longer suspects. The case will remain closed unless new evidence emerges.
Wisely use her right to remain silent??? BM this is a mother. A mother who is supposidly distraught over the loss of her daughter and will leave “no stone unturned” in her endless quest to find her. How can it be wise to remain silent? I thought both of them were determined to help the police in any way they could and had “nothing to hide”, so why not answer the bloody questions Kate?
