Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
We (well, I for one) elect the Government and her weekly sitreps makes sure the PM doesn’t stray from the straight and narrow otherwise she would have them over her knee!
That doesn’t happen though, does it?
The government has been openly violating people’s rights for decades. The scale of their aggression is beyond belief, they have placed the entire country under house arrest. The Queen is silent, either she is a coward or is being given false information.
So, lets consider ourselves lucky that we were born in a reasonably decent society where we are free to express an opinion and not one such as North Korea or god forbid, Saudi Arabia where your female rights would be a bit restricted.
I’m not sure what world you a living in, people are not allowed to express their opinion. Censorship is the most severe it has ever been in history, probably more than the soviet union achieved.
If you share your opinion online then you will be banned, and if you are unlucky the progressive commisars will have you fired from your job and arrested for hate crimes. If you share it in real life then you will be screeched at by the progressive footsoldiers, and then arrested for hate crimes if you were silly enough to do it in a public space.
We are now also starting to see financial institutions, banks and credit lenders (See Deutsche Bank, Mastercard, Stripe, Patreon, ect for examples) terminating accounts of people that they disagree with.
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by draculina.
We (well, I for one) elect the Government and her weekly sitreps makes sure the PM doesn’t stray from the straight and narrow otherwise she would have them over her knee!
That doesn’t happen though, does it?
The government has been openly violating people’s rights for decades. The scale of their aggression is beyond belief, they have placed the entire country under house arrest. The Queen is silent.
So, lets consider ourselves lucky that we were born in a reasonably decent society where we are free to express an opinion and not one such as North Korea or god forbid, Saudi Arabia where your female rights would be a bit restricted.
I’m not sure what world you a living in, people are not allowed to express their opinion. Censorship is the most severe it has ever been in history, probably more than the soviet union achieved.
If you share your opinion online then you will be banned, and if you are unlucky the progressive commisars will have you fired from your job and arrested for hate crimes. If you share it in real life then you will be screeched at by the progressive footsoldiers, and then arrested for hate crimes if you were silly enough to do it in a public space.
We are now also starting to see financial institutions, banks and credit lenders (See Deutsche Bank, Mastercard, Stripe, Patreon, ect for examples) terminating accounts of people that they disagree with.
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by draculina.
For example I would give far more legitimacy to and faith in the leadership of the Queen than the likes of an “elected” leader such as Tony Blair, David Cameron or Theresa May.
When did anyone vote to invade Iraq?
They didn’t, democracy is an illusion. The polical class will always do as they wish regardless.
The closest to home examples I know of who proclaim themselves as Civic Nationalists are the SNP, Plaid Cymru and Mebyon Kernow ( good ol’ Cornwall!).
They are most certainly not civic nationalists. They are globalist (internationalist) socialists.
I hope you find that a necessary evil unless you think that should happen through some sort of organic, thought sharing system that doesn’t involve leadership at all? Nah…i put my hands up. You’re gonna have to help me out on that one?
I dont have an answer for you, but no, not particularly. I have no preferance for this system.
For example I would give far more legitimacy to and faith in the leadership of the Queen than the likes of an “elected” leader such as Tony Blair, David Cameron or Theresa May.
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by draculina.
I actually had to look up the term legacy media so I think i’m up to speed with that. So…again..I’m intrigued as to what you regard as honest, professional, tested, verified information sources about what’s happening in the world around you. What or who do you believe and what is the internalisation that you follow to determine whether is it true or not, if, of course, you think truth is important.
There is no such source.
The only way that you can determine what is true is to bypass these propagandists and examine the primary sources (whitness statements, academic papers, ect) yourself. These have problems in themselves, but is the best we are able to do.
So…politics first. If you’re not a particular fan of democracy (you did write that didn’t you?) then I’m intrigued to know what indeed are your politics? Are you a traditional communist or fascist, are you maybe a vampirist or perhaps a conchist (Lord of the Flies). Would you prefer a bit more proportional representation in our lives? ( Yes to that..). What are your politics, if i can be so bold to ask? Please elaborate all you want.
This is two different questions, the manner in which a government operates and the policies that it implements are not related.
There are two problems that I have with democracy. The first is that most people do not posses sufficent understanding of politics to make an informed decision about what they are actually voting for. This is especially apparent in the system we use here in the UK, If you removed the party name and logos from ballot papers, most people would not recognise any of the candidates names or know what their views were. This means that the francise should be limited only to people who can prove that they understand the structure and function of the political system they are participating in, However, I do not trust the government to have the power to restrict francise. As there is no guarentee they will not alter these restrictions in future if it would benifit them.
The second issue is that democary is inherantly biased towards the left. This is because a leftist party can effectively bribe any section of the electorate that it chooses by announcing public spending on things that would benifit that group. I do not have a solution to this.
In regards to what my actual political views are, I would describe myself as a classical liberal / civic nationalist. The one and only purpose of the government is to protect the rights of it’s citizens. These rights are not granted by the government, and the government cannot ever take an action that would result in any right being infringed.Anything that does not contribute to the protection of rights should not be within the domain of the government, and they should have minimal involvement in it.
I’m not Linda, or particularly much of a Trump supporter but I will attempt to answer these questions.
Do you agree that he incited his followers to march to the Capitol and that he and his mates (boy trump and giuliani included) help to rile the crowd so much that it was inevitable some of them would bash the doors down, wreck the building and kill policeman? Note that he’d built them up to do this over 4 and more years. I do pity the poor girl’s family who have to live with her pointless death.
No, he did not. He told them to stop and to go home, but was censored by Twitter, Facebook, ect so that he could not communicate this to the people involved.
The people who incited this are those who refused to investigate allegations of voter fraud, leaving this as the only remaining option.
Did I really hear on several channels some of them saying that they would bring guns next time or was I imagining that?
I have not heard this. but it doesn’t seem likely given their behaviour while inside the building.
Do you believe the Qanon bullshit – sorry – theory that the violent rioters were leftists or antifa and everyone else was there to have tea and crumpets on the lawn?
It has been confirmed that antifa members infiltrated the protest group. How many there were, and what they did is unknown and likely never will be.
Would you have gone into the Capitol building if you had been there?
Probably not.
Were you there?
No, i’m not American.
Being a retired nerd with a bit of spare time, I’ve studied almost everyone of the so called fraudulent voting issues. EVERYONE of them- including your graphs and other points- have been COMPELETLY debunked by the Republican officials who were in charge of the elections. Probably everyone of them wanted trump to win but NOT AT THE EXPENSE OF SCREWING THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS. I think you should be proud of those Americans who believe and en-act your Constitution to the letter. I urged Cleared2Land (and Puds) to listen to Gabriel Sterling’s speech where he goes over every contentious voting point regarding Georgia. I suggest you do the same. It’ll help short-cut your re-education process called “THE TRUTH” Can you do that Linda? Please? Googling ‘ youtube none of that is true sterling ‘ will get you to it. You’ve put your evidence. Now it’s time to hear the other side. Like in court. If you believe in justice.
Much of the evidence is not public, as it was never heard in court. It’s not possible for this evidence to be “debunked”. The samples of evidence that have been presented in public hearings have not been “debunked”.
Do you still believe in democracy and the peaceful and presidential transition of power?
I am not particularly a fan of democracy, but transition to a president that half of the electorate does not believe won the election is not democratic.
Are you going to listen to what your new President (That’s Joe Biden by the way) has to say about the future of your country and on a media channel that makes some attempt to toe the middle (pseudo truthful) ground? Linda, here’s a hint. Ozzie Rupert Murdoch really doesn’t have your personal interests in mind. He only wants your money. And as for newsmax, oann, rush limbaugh etc etc,,,,…… nahhh. They really do tell so many fibs to max their advertising revenues. Even though it has it’s faults, I still believe in the BBC, paid for by the people,accountable to the people, no adverts, fantastic dramas and reasonably fair news reporting. They reported trump as he was. In my humble opinion, America desperately needs a BBC.
Legacy media is biased beyond all reason, anything they have to say isn’t worth listening to.
Do you think you might be taken in by the trump dynasty in the future? A lot of trumpers appear to have dedicated their votes for Eric, Don Jr, Ivanka and Baron already. I ask because if you were to have a clever trumpist in the Oval Office in the future…….o m g.
There is no Trump dynasty if Biden becomes president, and I dont think there is if he doesn’t either.
Do you know anyone who voted for trump in 2016 but regrets it now? They might be a good friend to have.
Not one, but I know many people who voted for Clinton 2016 who said they voted for Trump in 2020.
1 member liked this post.
Any of you wonder how some one winning big..few hours later stop counting…few hours later wow 136,000 votes show up for one party votes and not one for the other. Not a single vote? What your common sense telling you?
Similar events happened in both Michigan and Winconsin at the same time. Not only were there no votes for Trump, but none for the libertarian or green partries either, nor any for independent candidates. Even if somehow these counties are 100% democrat, we are expected to believe that not a single person checked the wrong box by accident, or voted for Trump or Kanye West as a joke?
Democratic party registrations in both states are down, the Republicans havent made any significant losses in the senate or house elections, but there is record breaking turnouts for Biden?
None of this makes any sense.
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 9 months ago by draculina. Reason: Added graph
1 member liked this post.
No, there is no justification for it.
I haven’t paid it for years.
I’ll take that as a yes then?
-
This reply was modified 4 years, 6 months ago by
