Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
That was why I and others highlighted the real abuse, this was not social media, not even sure why social media got brought into it as the documentary does mention it either, and if it was involved it’s even more worse :)
Read the title of the video you posted.
That was what I was responding to in that specific instance, as I already said earlier.
Why people must continue to misrepresent what I have said I don’t know.
That’s the real issue though King, it is often all interconnected when it is children, physically in person and mentally via social media etc. The threats and taunts made on social media prolonging the the cruelty and mental anguish of the child.
Threats or taunts made on social media are trivially easy to avoid.
Block anyone who has made a threat, or anyone who you suspect may make one. If you think it is something that will cause you ‘mental anguish’.
1 member liked this post.
Sociology is not a science, it should not be treated like one.
I am not making any claims, I am curious why you glibly dismiss academic works with no evidence of your own.
Because those ‘academic’ works are not supported by any evidence themselves.
Sociologists nearly always misuse the word theory when they mean hypothesis. Which lends more crediblity to their publications than they actually merit.
1 member liked this post.
Exactly Jane, Draculina talks like this was a social media incident:
I’m not talking about this specific case.
Drac, saying that blocking messages makes the problem disappear is wrong., If the kid is at school with the bullies, the problem is still there. If the kid has to travel on the same school bus every day as the bullies, the problem is still there.
That is a different problem, and requires a different solution.
If people sending you messages that offend you is a problem, then blocking them makes the problem disapear. There will be no more messages.
Notice the part I have made bold, this is simple if/then logic. I’m not sure how this is escaping you. I said that IF x is a poblem THEN it can be solved by y. I never said anything about z.
sceptical guy wrote: Could you explain why some people are ‘weaker’ (more sensitive?) than others, and what the proper treatment would be? That is beyond my understanding of psychology, and mental health conditions.
I would expect that most anxiety disorders would make make someone more sensitive to abusive comments.
I have no idea what the best way of treating them is though.
Can you post your thesis that feminist critical theory is bullsh*t please.
Can you post your thesis that it is correct please?
Could you explain why some people are ‘weaker’ (more sensitive?) than others, and what the proper treatment would be?
That is beyond my understanding of psychology, and mental health conditions.
The treatment however, would depend both on the child, and what is wrong with them.
It isn’t as simple as just “blocking” bullies, because quite often those bullies include children in that child’s own peer group. I don’t mean this personally Draculina but when adults don’t even understand the problem, how are they meant to help children with it. Blocking, turning off etc is just a cop out and does nothing to address the real issue.
If people sending you messages that offend you is a problem, then blocking them makes the problem disapear. There will be no more messages.
1 member liked this post.
DRACULINA ARE SEXIST AND A VERY NASTY PEOPLE SO DO ONE
Woman is sexist against other women.
(Yes, I know that femminists would describe this as internalised misogyny, but femminist critical theory is bs)
-
This reply was modified 8 years, 9 months ago by draculina. Reason: I know it's a troll account, but I thought it would be funny to reply as if it was serious
-
This reply was modified 8 years, 9 months ago by
