emmalush

Jermaine was sitting on his bed talking to shilpa who was sitting on the floor, jermaine was whispering the reason why he felt “the odd one out” amognst the majority white tribe (as if he didn’t know that would be the case going into it…) and that when he saw shilpa come in through the door, he felt better because then he was not the only one…[Read more]

Jermaine playing the race card with shilpa…knows full well the channel4 would show it, and that the white public would feel sorry for them.

@Matty wrote:

example.. flowing game, then an innicdent happens, they all stop and wait… sky tv decide to put an advert in while we wait, the decision does’nt prove to be conclusive, we then have 7 mins of injury time, where a team scores in the last min, a manager then complains that we use the tv replays too much, and the game was better…

[Read more]

@token_male wrote:

you think television would fund cameras for every football league team?
92 teams? all being bought cameras by a tv company to enable this rule to come into play?

No, at most you would only need 46 per weekend. Currently, all the premier league games are covered by several tv cameras. Most championship games have atleast 2…

[Read more]

@token_male wrote:

only the teams that can afford to have hudreds of multi angled cameras at their ground would benefit from it!

Hundreds?? TV would fund the cameras via the tv deals in the “professional” game.

sounds very lets keep the rich rich.

NO, it would help smaller clubs, because refs are biased to bigger supported clubs.

i just dont see…

[Read more]

@Matty wrote:

football has been going for 100 years and more, it has survived pretty well so far without it, why have it now, its just another call out to take the game more commercial, leave it as a sport, don’t pish about with it

You like it the way it is, but football didnt start out with referees…humans who were involved in the game (like…[Read more]

@token_male wrote:

to say they arent allowed to endorse things would mean that on match of the day they would have to blur out all the billboards around the pitches and on the teams shirts.

My point about this is, that some people who work at the BBC get gifts, commercial gifts after intentionally advertising certain products, as expressed by the…[Read more]

@Slayer wrote:

:lol: :lol:

There aren’t many chavs in Lincoln Smiley- not where I live anyway, lots of sheep tho

:D You and your sheep football top must feel right at home.

Theeerre’s a circus in the town, in the town
Raaaarbert maxwell’s gone and drowned, gone and drowned
Arthur cox has got the fooking pots
Derby county’s staying down, staying…[Read more]

But you “think its negative to ommit details of things if someone pays for the rights to something when spoken about professionally it should be refferred to as that”.

You care enough to say you think its negative, but it dont annoy you…

Because humans make errors, refs, players and managers can and do contribute to a team suffering. Managers and players are constantly trying new things to improve their human errors, but we just let refs get on with it, pretending they cant be helped, madness.

WHY shouldn’t we help them??????????????????

@smileysfriend wrote:

And that would stop human error????

Was the entire world wrong when they knew spurs had scored at old trafford a while back? I suggest that if the guy in the stand isnt sure about a decision, then he/she does nothing.

@token_male wrote:

i think its negative to ommit details of things if someone pays for the rights to something when spoken about professionally it should be refferred to as that

So you think its wrong when they say “the magic of this years fa cup”?

H came out the day he went in, via the sun titilation magazine.

@Matty wrote:

i’m saying poor teams should stop complaining about the ref, and look more at there performance throughout the season

But refs make human errors that cost teams points. Wouldn’t it be better if other humans gave them help?

it all evens itself out

No it doesn’t. People who dont wana give refs help say this.

people complain way too…

[Read more]

@ChatHostUK wrote:

Technically they are not directly advertising

Of course they are, there mentioning a sponsor of the product there broadcasting.

when companies obtain the official sponsorship rights to these events, the event’s name includes the sponsor’s name.

Doesn’t mean we all go around calling the fa cup the fa cup sponsered by e.on….and…

[Read more]

@Slayer wrote:

Is naming the sponsor of a match on air the same as advertising?

Of course. The deal is, whether or not the BBC are allowed to advertise for free? Is it legally free?

They dont have to say e.on, like they dont have to have the watch company on the score caption.

Is it the e.on sponsered fa cup, like the carling cup rather than the…[Read more]

@AbitofMary_J wrote:

@emmalush wrote:

“celebrity BB”, is about non celebs aswell sharon.

I think the people of England deserve the right to have a thread dedicated to the non celebs.

and what happened to the rest of the COUNTRY…?? on the isle is there only England..?? I must be living elsewhere then…

Im English, why would i be bothered about…[Read more]

@Matty wrote:

a ref decision won’t send your team down

Are you saying its impossible for a ref to make a decision that will lose a team a game?

“celebrity BB”, is about non celebs aswell sharon.

I think the people of England deserve the right to have a thread dedicated to the non celebs.

@Matty wrote:

never said they would’nt work.. just don’t think the game needs them, it will have more of a negitive effect on the game as it would positive

Do wrong decisions have a positive or negative effect? Is it ok for a ref to send your team down, lose you a bet etc, if he gets a decision wrong?