Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
8 May, 2006 at 8:41 pm #214097
@slayer wrote:
So there we finally have it- there is no law, there is no compulsion
Guidlines to do what slayer, you still havnt asnswered that yet, cos you know full well it means guidlines to force.
Children are “forced” to go to school every day, are “forced” to take PE, History, Maths etc- things they don’t want to do
What 3 year olds learn that. Deary me.
8 May, 2006 at 8:33 pm #214095@james Belfast wrote:
erm..in your heading you dozy cow.
:oops: Wrote the wrong thing there :D Tis child abuse though, so not scraping the barrel, just stating fact.
How about replying to the other points i made, or have you lost the argument and now see sense?
8 May, 2006 at 8:18 pm #214052@pete wrote:
youre inferring the afro caribbeans are the “racists” its bloody stupid officials that are to blame for bloody stupid policies
The afro caribbeans are quite happy to segregate themselves from the rest of society. People get called racists for that, and i take your point too, the LHA are inciting racial hatred, but because they work VERY closely with the lefty council, hey whats the matter…
8 May, 2006 at 8:15 pm #214134@forumhostpb wrote:
BTW – the lovely and ever fragrant Emma also spouts bollocks most of the time too – and I equally support her right to do so.
She is clearly yet another single issue bigot.
Thanks you fascist :wink:
8 May, 2006 at 8:11 pm #214093@james Belfast wrote:
you must be scraping the bottom of several barrels if you try to dress this one up as child abuse.
Where does it say i said that???
Your craftily-worded heading says it all about you – you are evil and arrogant.
You must have a mirror next to your screen :wink:
Never mind trying to pretend to argue over the word ‘may’, why on earth would it be PHYSICAL AND MENTAL CHILD ABUSE to encourage white children to play together with black children from as early an age as possible?
Because if you read it all carefully, those marxists say “should” play together. Ipso facto, if they dont, then must be forced, that will include physical abuse if the child throws a wobbly, like alot of 3 year olds do.
Were your children not aware of what is ‘good’ and ‘bad’ (e.g. touching the fire is bad, reading is good) by the age of 3? Who taught them that – the parents. Did they know why reading is good or clever or why the fire is bad at that age – probably not but they knew not to touch the fire cos mummy and daddy said so. Their views were fixed by that age.
No one told me that it is bad not to want to play with another child because he or she was a different colour. I was given the choice.
Can you not therefore get it through your thick fecking head that the professor could be (probably is) right when he says that the children’s views on skin colour can already be fixed by the age of 3
EVERYTHING “could” be this that or the other.
I say, lets deal with facts when it comes to 3 year old children, not turn them into scientific experiments because of a failed multicultural experiment that went wrong.
some nurseries may well need to insist that the children play together
Need i go on…
Most right-thinking (i.e. sane) parents would be APPALLED if their kids were kept apart from other kids at school because of skin colour.
WHO is doing that???
PLEASE GIVE EMMA HER OWN THREAD COS I AM SICK OF HAVING TO READ THIS SHYTE FROM HER
You dont make much sense anyway.
8 May, 2006 at 8:01 pm #214048she tried to imply that what you wanted was what she said
Thats impossible, because i dont want what she said. She assumed wrongly, and still hasnt appologised, but instead prefers to weive her way out of what she said like a slippery snake.
8 May, 2006 at 7:44 pm #214130@rab wrote:
The government said Mr Haw posed a potential security risk and described his argument as absurd
Peace = potential security risk, absurd? I rather think so, dont you?
These are the very idiotic people who are running our society.
What are we going to do about it?
Mr Haw’s solicitor is understood to have written to the police saying his client will not leave Parliament Square voluntarily.
Speaking from his makeshift shelter, Mr Haw, who was not in court, said: “They were completely and utterly wrong.
“This is such a farce. Security? I have been here five years keeping the security of Parliament. We are not the security risk, we are not the risk to the world, Bush and Blair are.”
Mr Haw’s supporters shared his anger at the decision.
Do you support Mr Haw and Edward Atkinson?
If so, what are you going to do, to stop blairs regime from stiffling your freedom to speak?
Civil rights pressure group Liberty said the ruling was a “blow to free speech”.
Do you agree you should have civil rights?
If so, what are you going to do to ensure you keep them?
Director Shami Chakrabarti said: “Unfortunately, today’s judgment, and the law he (Tony Blair) passed, prove the right to protest is under severe threat in this country.”
This is the asian lady with the short black hair, often on question time (for those who dont know).
She is defending us, she is not alone, but she needs OUR help.
Do you like the idea that gives you freedom to protest?
If so, what are you going to do to ensure that continues?
We are in major changes in our history. We have a fascist government, who will stop at nothing to murder innocent people in a foreign country, through ilegal means.
If you think that is bad, then what can stop them from inflicting the above against us, not much you might think? You are right.
8 May, 2006 at 7:24 pm #214045@Mrs Clean wrote:
Emma, sometimes you have to look on the on light side of life (whistles!)
You tried to imply that i want what you said, then you made out it was a joke, so why the ” :roll: “?
8 May, 2006 at 7:17 pm #214128@Mrs Clean wrote:
Hasn’t yet stopped you expressing yourself Emma :?
Very true, but this cannot be right surely?
All he did was legally send pictures and video footgae to “authority”, how is that a criminal offence?
If your grandmother did this, how would you then react, what would you think of blairs regime then?
Evil dictatorship’s start without many knowing….
8 May, 2006 at 7:10 pm #214042@Mrs Clean wrote:
@emmalush wrote:
@Mrs Clean wrote:
Yeh Emma send all em all back on the next banana boat :roll:
Thats a rather racist and fascist thing to say.
I was being IRONIC and you know it, don’t try and wind me up Emma, Im past all that :roll:
Ok, its just that i dont see racism and fascist belief in joking terms, unless those who portray it, know those who recieve it, well.
-
AuthorPosts