Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@forumhostpb wrote:
No he isn’t.
But he said
“The first two shipments were not slaves but vagrant (ie homeless) children- rounded up and shipped to Virginia- this continued over the next 150 years to the tune of approx 600 children. It was not white slaves which outnumbered the black slaves, it was white CONVICTS”homeless and convicts, not slaves?
Slayer, you’re saying its impossible to be homeless or a convict, and not be enslaved?
PB, you’re like a child. Theres only so much humour you can get away with, then it becomes tedius.
Talk about what the NF said? Or are you thick.
@emmalush wrote:
Later this month, when the Queen visists St James town Virginia, will you hear about it? If you do, just cast your mind back to the last weeks and all the media production dedicated to saying sorry to the black man, and ask yourself, a fair report?
Will there ever be a media frenzy over the white slaves by North African Muslims between 1530 and 1780?
Lets have a fair and equal society.
Well the “British” Queen has been in America some days now, and i havn’t seen one single tv clip telling of the white slaves who perished there several hundred years ago. All ive seen is the cock-up of bush, and the plane steps not reaching the floor, i mean…come on.
Ok, Anthony bliar has performed one of his stage shows to the tv coach potato, its a seller, but think back a few months to the black enslavement story, you couldn’t switch on your tv, radio or mobile without the white feathers insisting we appologise for something we hadn’t done, and brainwashing the helpless zombies into submission of guilt.
Us whities dont count anymore, even we think that.
No wonder 350,000 white people leave this country EVERY year.
Education, edu-frigging-cation, edu-anti-white-cation.
Yeah i take that point of him taking his time, and if im honest, i think he did it to frustrate higgy higgins.
His asian manger did tell us though, that after his break down 18 months ago, when he got his act together after all the things in his personal life was upsetting, that he decided to concentrate on his snooker, for his dad, and that, it was about playing the game to the max of having fun, which meant concentrating on every shot, so not only did he play serious to win, but he did so with an attitude of playing for fun.
To get within touching distance of winning the tournament, is brilliant.
He did this with a certain style that is rare these days, he reminded me of hurricane higgins. he may not have had what we know higgins had, but its what higgins had in one tournament.
And remember, higgins didnt always win, or be in a final.
I really hope that Selby continues this way, and thankfully, nothing has been reported of him letting this tournament get to his head.
What is football, its not a big club spending £30,000,000 on a player, its kicking a ball.
Snooker is a game to be played for fun, Mark Selby did that at the highest level.
BM, please dont take this the wrong way, but you are so thick in understanding what im saying.
Most people would rather see a jimmy white v o’sullivan game than a hendry v davis game, purely because they’d be entertained more.
Selby entertained the most, thats what i would call a true champion, a champion of the people, like what they called jimmy, o’sullivan and hurricane higgins.
In the 2007 world championship snooker finals, Mark Selby was the true champion of the people, the greatest entertainer.
@Bad Manners wrote:
That dosent matter.
People who answer like that, are scared of answering the question.
Davis and Hendry are the two most successful players in the history of Snooker. That’s all that matters.
Absolutely, if what you care about more, is winning for the sake of winning.
I’d rather play to enjoy myself first and foremost.
Thick.
@Bad Manners wrote:
Nastase and Agassi and a few others liked to clown and “smile” on a Tennis court. Pete Sampras didnt. He was clinical, effecient and all-buisness when he got on a court.
Did it make him any less a Champion? Absolutely not.It made him someone who wanted to win a trophy, not someone who played tennis for the love of.
When you go to work, do you do it for the love of, or to earn money.
Who would you rather watch, davis v hendry, or jimmy white v o’sullivan?
