FEKRARAMAR

The Duluth model (as implemented) usually states that all claims of violence against a women must automaticly be believe. Proponents of this model usually also are the type that say that words are a type of violence. (Apparently proposing to a women is also violence?).

I found it odd that Ge asked for evidence of any bullying happening, despite…[Read more]

This isn’t a question.

How can I avoid the question when you didn’t ask one?

This isn’t a question.

This isn’t a question.

Listen and believe …

Or does the Duluth model only apply when it is convenient?

(I wanted to bring up femminist critical theory in this thread too)

I would like to hear you explain to me why anti-positivism should be considered scientific.

The persion with a PhD knows something about research methodology, weird.

When did I say anything even remotely similar to that?

It’s hard to tell the difference between people who are virtue signaling, and people who genuinely care about an issue when I don’t know anything about them.

It is the role of a parent to advise them on what they should do. As they have ‘adult eyes’ as you descibe it.

And yes, blocking the people involved will halt it, words cannot hurt you if you can’t see them.

(Not that they should hurt you when you can see them)

(Positivist branches of sociology can broadly considered to be scientific, but critical ‘theory’, of any variety does not fall into this category)

It stop the online aspect of the bullying, in order to stop any physical part then other measures must be taken. As I have repeatedly said during this thread.

Rationally, if you want to prevent it happening to other kids.

Maybe you don’t care about that, I don’t know. But I have young children, and it’s in my interest in preventing them from commiting suicide.

Rationally, if you want to prevent it happening to other kids.

Why is it so hard for you to understand when I make statements like that I am only talking about online bullying?

I knew it would be a bad idea to post on this thread because people would react emotionally and blind them to what I am actually trying to say.

Read the title of the video you posted.

That was what I was responding to in that specific instance, as I already said earlier.

Why people must continue to misrepresent what I have said I don’t know.

Read the title of the video you posted.

Threats or taunts made on social media are trivially easy to avoid.

Block anyone who has made a threat, or anyone who you suspect may make one. If you think it is something that will cause you ‘mental anguish’.

Sociology is not a science, it should not be treated like one.

Because those ‘academic’ works are not supported by any evidence themselves.

Sociologists nearly always misuse the word theory when they mean hypothesis. Which lends more crediblity to their publications than they actually merit.