Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
20 November, 2006 at 4:14 pm #248096
You’ve got to kill ’em somehow Zaf. A swift whack on the back of the head with a Birmingham screwdriver (lump hammer) is the best method. Whip the skin off whilst everything is still warm, and pop the meat into a casserole dish with some vedgetables and stock.
MMmmmmmmm yummy !!!!
20 November, 2006 at 12:00 pm #250113Ya cheeky bunch of …… !!!
The STD clinic is only viewable by registered users. This means that to see it you MUST be able to sign in as a member – the internet at large cannot see it (Thank God !!!).
Mary, most probably you were a bit ”tired” at the time, and accidentally clicked onto the boards without using your correct login sequence. This means that you would have been logged in as a visitor or guest, and not as a member. This would account for you not seeing the STD clinic.
These things can happen even to the most sober of members Mary, much less those on a ‘yoghurt’ diet. I sometimes wonder how some users manage to sign in at all – much less type stuff.
20 November, 2006 at 11:24 am #249967I watched a programme on BBC1 last night on the subject of teenage drinking. The thing that appalled me most was the apparent acquiescence of the various parents in allowing their young children to go out alone (or with a ‘girlfriend’) and stay out until the early hours. It appears that they all simply hung around the streets drinking industrial quantities of vodka, cider etc etc.
It’s back to the morality point again isn’t it – and showing your children a good example of how to behave, or conduct themselves through life.
Having a youngster return home at 12.00; 1.00 or 2.00am or later, on a regular basis, and arriving home pissed out of their minds can hardly be described as responsible parenthood. But this sort of unacceptable behaviour doesn’t suddenly start with the onset of puberty, it gradually and imperceptibly grows and becomes the accepted norm over a period of time.
As so-called responsible adults (whatever one thinks THAT may be!!!), we have an absolute duty to our children to shield them and protect them from the dangers of this sort of behaviour. This not only includes drinking alchohol (to excess) but also indulging in the whole range of sexual activities, hanging around the streets late at night, experimenting with so-called ‘harmless’ drugs (marijuana etc), and so on.
I wonder how many JustChat board members, who are also parents of 11- 16 year old children, can really honestly put their hand on their heart and say that they fully discharge their parental responsibilities in this respect???
I’m not fishing for a load of ”I’d NEVER let my son/daughter do that etc” type of posts. I’m simply posing a question for the individual to mull over quietly and privately, and ponder on whether they have to accept their own share of responsibility in all this.
20 November, 2006 at 7:19 am #249964I have to agree with Mr B on this one. The fact is that very very sadly a huge number of young girls in the 11 – 16 age group are not only sexually active but are regularly so.
Speaking as a father, my belief is that the first ‘line of defence’ to all this starts in the home. Primarily it is the parent’s responsibility to set their children a good moral example and to teach and guide them such that they don’t just screw around but act with a sense of morality.
This necessarily HAS to start at an early age – pre-teens maybe – because if a young girl is brought up in an environment where her mother (for example) regularly has a succession of boyfriends, and she has a regular succession of ”Uncles” then the example that this stes is hardly morally uplifting is it?
The Police are sometimes put in an impossible position whereby a 14 or 15 year old girl is regularly sleeping with her ‘boyfriend’ with the full knowledge (and implied consent) of her parent(s). Under these circumstances, prosecution for USI (Unlawful Sexual Intercourse) becomes a bit of a farce.
17 November, 2006 at 12:53 pm #249235Try THIS site Cas —> http://www.crimestoppers-uk.org/ceop/
… and get general information on child abusers here —>
17 November, 2006 at 12:51 pm #249237An excellent idea. They are in breach of their release conditions by failing to notify Police of ANY change in their residential address and as a result can be returned to prison for up to FIVE years.
Look for your local paedophile here —> http://www.crimestoppers-uk.org/ceop/
17 November, 2006 at 10:34 am #248754Oooo urrr … a poynt orv Shoires moi deario moi little beauty. Oi carn’t wait. :lol:
(BTW – my earlier ‘senior moment’ has now passed !!!)
16 November, 2006 at 7:18 pm #248024Waits for somebody to correct Owen’s interpretation of Imperial measurements.
16 November, 2006 at 2:32 pm #249119The Buffalo News is a nasty little Fascist rag serving only Western New York and is therefore not credible as a source Emma.
Find some more proof !!!
16 November, 2006 at 10:42 am #248763Well it’s the only sensible thing to do O Batty one. Your PC is loaded with rubbish and covered in bat cr@p, torching it would put it out of its misery.
-
AuthorPosts
