[GAZLAN]

Just finishing off this fat 1 then a quickstep to tescos . . . Wonder if that lesbian bi~tch is behind the deli counter today. :lol: :wink:

[GAZLAN]

@jen_jen wrote:

How on earth do you get from disagreeing with that tripe to being a lesbian?
Have I entered a timewarp?

Re the “progressive couple” though, I do think that they’re experimenting with a social concept without any regard for the welfare of the child.

Hmmm . . . you’re the half count then? :lol:

I don’t particularly agree with his physical equation to power but, he goes on to say ~

The signs last week weren’t only on walls or in newspapers. Most of the young women I saw on the street clearly defined their self-worth in terms of sex appeal.
But they seemed to regard male attention as predatory. They were like amateur streetwalkers who were both too self-enamored and gender-confused to relate to males.

The increasing acceptance of this morally bankrupt ‘gayness’ in all forms is by definition slowly destroying masculinity. This in turn can only have a negative effect on what we term ‘natural’ relationships. In the greater scheme of course and if endorsed as is, the dilution of masculinity will without doubt lead to an even more morally bankrupt society, not least potentially causing adverse adolescence amongst the youth subjected to it. Henry’s spiritual persuasion does appear to cast an outdated view which I agree probably doesn’t take into account ‘natural’ progression within the world but, his concerns are a genuine and I share them also.

[GAZLAN]

@kent f OBE wrote:

Shame on you Gaz…….is that what you call women who reject your advances also……..Lesbo’s? :roll:

Well I did say wooopz . . . :lol:

[GAZLAN]

Well we do have to take into account Henry’s ‘spiritual’ inclination toward this. :lol:

For example, on Saturday, the largest newspaper, The Toronto Star, featured a front-page story on a “progressive” couple which is raising their third child, “Storm” to be genderless. They are not telling the child or anyone else what sex s/he is.
Inside there are two full pages where this Marxist couple explains, “If you really want to get to know someone, you don’t ask what’s between their legs.”
“We’ve decided not to share Storm’s sex for now — a tribute to freedom of choice in place of limitation, a standup for what the world could become in Storm’s lifetime (a more progressive place.)”

Storm in a D-Cup perhaps ?
:lol:

Three lezzbo’s so far then . . . wooopz I mean feminists . . Well two and half, I think lol :wink:

[GAZLAN]

@pickle wrote:

You still here thought you had flown the nest
or was that wishfall thinking :wink:

:shock: Pickle ! is that you ? :lol: ]

Someone has to look after the chicks.

Are you a Reb-elle ?

Just answer the question :wink:

[GAZLAN]

Where the F~k did last night go :lol: :lol: :lol:

[GAZLAN]

It seems there are lessons to be learned.

Quite frankly, are we so de-sensitized that we need to be constantly reminded :?:
What does that say about ‘us’ :?:

[GAZLAN]

@mrs_teapot wrote:

Keep yer trousers in a pleat, make sure your shoes are nice and neat….cos you nevva know just who yer gonna meet…… love it! :D

In a ‘Grassington accent ? :lol:

[GAZLAN]

Looks like emotional blackmail just occurred. :roll:

[GAZLAN]

So ya betta hold ya toppa in ya hand

Oh ya nevva know just oo ya gonna meet :lol:

[Author]

Posts