Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
22 December, 2010 at 2:29 am #456831
My natural rights as i see them, to live in this country i was born into where-ever i want on vacant land. My natural right not be enslaved to a society run by suited and booted criminals. My natural right to build a home from whatever natural materials i so choose. My natural right to use the plants, trees and all things natural as i see fit and proper. My natural right to move freely without control and harrassment from the law. My natural right to withdraw from what i believe to be illegal and unlawful practice by Government and the forces they manipulate. There are many things , some of which i believe you yourself take exception to. But these things i list are by far the most crucial.
22 December, 2010 at 2:15 am #456829What those lost souls were fighting for was to protect what they believed to true, pure, honest and straight. I do not intend to discuss with you the workings and mechanisms of those in power at the time of these wars. What they may have believed they were protecting is not what we see evident in this country today. Who has the right to deny me my natural birth right ? Not a single person, if you believe otherwise then youy really are indoctrinated and there is no further discussion to be had. Quite simply, this is my belief, there is not a single being entitled to take what is naturally given, not a one.
22 December, 2010 at 2:04 am #456827@pikey wrote:
How would a society function if people were able to opt out? Are you convinced that there are no bad eggs amongst us?
Come now Mr Pikey, do believe that society cannot be changed. Once the ignorant have bcome educated, they themselves will create a society as a society should be, by the people-for the people-with the people. Please don’t try and tell me that i should accept what we commonly know as democracy in this country.22 December, 2010 at 1:50 am #456825I don’t recall ever saying i should be exempt from the law of the land, as you say, i have an opprtunity to protest it, to challenge it or indeed work with it to my own advantage, which i have done on occassion.
I have no disagreement with being part of a society, i do feel aggrieved when choice of membership is withdrawn. Now you talk of being without this Governance as if without it we would all perish. Absolute rubbish i say, their are thousands possibly in the tens/hundreds now becomming aware of this so called civilised society for what lies beneath it. It is the enemy within that must be destroyed, then true civility can breathe without this tax raisng compulsory indoctrination nonsense.22 December, 2010 at 1:32 am #456823@pikey wrote:
I wonder if Mr Gazlan is prepared to have his views examined in the way he seems to think it is reasonable to examine other people’s beliefs. I’m prepared to be David Frost.
Don’t let me stop you.
22 December, 2010 at 1:31 am #456822The problem Mr Pikey, appears to be with others accepting my point and then challenging it.
Now Mike James as i say, may have extreme views, other material i read from him suggests that it is the forceful change in British culture he rants about. Now we both know very well that no such force of culture is possible. You cannot forcefully change an inbred ethos, it mus t come from within, to think or suggest otherwise is total non-sense and worthy only of the weak of mind.
People including myself are free to kill or destroy at will regardless of whether there is a force in operation. Those who carry out such acts have no regard for decency or law in my opinion which renders your point moot
22 December, 2010 at 1:19 am #456816@(f)politics? wrote:
Well Gaz looks like your fooked mate you are not free never will be free and in a similar boat to the rest of us :lol:
Perhaps, but you will never see me bow my head. As i have said, i use their system and their funds to pay for the demands they make upon me. So you see, every cloud really does have a silver lining. :) :) :)
As far as usury is concerned, ignorance is no excuse i’m afraid, do some research perhaps.
22 December, 2010 at 1:14 am #452501Don’t forget, it’s not wrong to be born of another race or colour, it is not wrong to freely choose whichever faith you believe is right.
What is wrong is to denounce people because of the colour of their skin, it is wrong to denounce people because they belong to a faith group. Any person who behaves in this manner is an affront to all you may believe to be ” freedom ” and more importantly, the wasted souls fighting in their belief in those bloody wars that they would safe guard what we consider ” freedom “. . . . Those lost souls must turn in their graves at the sickening outright abuse of power we now see evident in this Beautiful country, perpetuated by mindless uneducated fact-less entities who wrote that absolute sh~it above.
22 December, 2010 at 1:04 am #456813Oh dear Mr Pikey, have they gotten to you as well ? Believe someone has put me in charge ?
Of what might i ask. In charge of my own free thinking mind yes !Now, i don’t want to carry on repeating myself here, i will repeat one last time ok.
My point initially was ~ There is not a single person here can tell me a legitimate way in retracting my state ownership while remaining on this patch of earth commonly known as England. There was no mention of wanting to breach the law, of course as i have mentioned, i am free to do as i please, naturally there will be consequences should i breach the law.
As far as the idiot using the skin colour as part of any point to be made other than a valid non derogatory point, he is a small minded fool, this is plain to see by the following remarks made by this creature.
“The Geordie” bloke you refer to may have what could be considered extreme views yes, however, you might like to explain yourself with your following point ~some of the people you have posted links to would quite happily see you deported or worse based purely on the colour of your bum.~
How on this earth do you justify such a point ?
Now i hope this has made things crystal clear, so far every point i have made in this thread has been a valid point, it has not, nor can be disproved under the criterion described.21 December, 2010 at 5:24 pm #198840 -
AuthorPosts

