[Morgan.]

Ge wrote:

debate in real time

Can you define this term please?

Does it mean?, Ge must get a response to his post within 5 mins of it being posted even if someone is cooking dinner, or reading the news, watching TV, has company at home, multitasking. Ge’s posts have priority over everybodies dinner time.

Or does it mean, Ge expects all posts in response to his must be made within a certain time period otherwise Ge will assume someone is googling responses?

Or does it mean?, when people are in JC, they must do nothing other then stare at the screen, keep refreshing their page every few seconds avidly awaiting Ge’s responses so as they can IMMEDIATELY start pounding furiously responses to Ge.

What if my hubby comes home from work horny and needs me in the bedroom, shall I tell him I’m busy waiting for a post from Ge that must be “debated in real time”?

Personally speaking, I’d prefer to wait for a response, if it will come measured, reasoned and well written, rather that a rash, first thing that pops into my head response.

 

• This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by  Morgan..

[Morgan.]

blueyedboy wrote:

While I’m not aganist the bombing of a monster like Assad…she shudda went to parliament to ask MPs to vote on it…that’s what they are there for…

She also has provisions so as she doesn’t have to consult parliament in certain circumstances. That’s what they are there for.

[Morgan.]

Preservation of Life is more important than loss of life.

Preservation of life is a success.

[Morgan.]

sceptical guy wrote:

I genuinely don’t recognise any resemblance between the oddly vague points made by Mr Bollox above and the arguments I put forward about Iran, the Balfour Declaration, and the Middle East.

I shall in true scep style read between the lines. This is scep grumbling and bitching because I’m not paying him enough attention, or addressing any of his points.

I refuse to debate the middle east with anyone who thinks that Iran is only just acquiring some influence in the region or that the Balfour Declaration has anything to do with recarving. So,

I will take the liberty of re-writing the Balfour Declaration, just for scep as he feels neglected, and needs my attention and writings to read. He also likes to read between the lines. We can all do that.

The JC Balfour Declaration 2018
The King advocates that Palestine be recarved and facilitates a new nation. The King advocates making a territory into a state, borders will be adjusted where necessary to create and facilitate this new state for the Jewish people. Maybe more than one state will be created. We’ll see. Just a wild guess, the Jewish people will name this new nation being recarved from Palestine, Israel. In order for Palestine to facilitate this establishment of Israel, new borders will have to be drafted, new countries could be founded from the remainder of Palestine that doesn’t become Israel. New maps will have to be made. Palestine will be carved up.

No matter what way you interpret it. The Balfour agreement has nothing to do with recarving. I admit scep, you were right, I am wrong. I am just a charlatan best ignored x

 

• This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by  Morgan..

[Morgan.]

Silky Smooth

 

Crumpet, would you like to see my sexual organ if scep doesn’t?

[Morgan.]

sceptical guy wrote:

Is Mr Bollox giving a deliberately muddled answer, ignoring every point I’ve made in the hope that he’ll wing it unchallenged??

You make many points. You are welcome to your views. I’m welcome to mine. I’ve seen your views, and am unimpressed. I have no need to challenge them. If something grabs me, I may respond. I have noticed you don’t pick up many of my many points either. If you shall be rude to me and disrespectful then don’t be a hypocrite and expect me to sing to your tune.

As I have seen you say on another thread, “I’m not here to answer your questions and sing to your tune” or words to that effect. You can not expect others to sing to your tune if that’s your attitude x

[Morgan.]

May I ask why you assume, and have concluded, my gender?

Have you seen my sexual organ?

Would you like to see it?

 

[Morgan.]

sceptical guy wrote:

The Balfour Agreement, unlike Sykes-Picot, had nothing to do with carving or re-carving anything

I disagree. To quote from the Balfour declaration:
“His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object.”

That advocates a recarving of the region in my opinion. To “facilitate”, to make possible by adjusting, to re shuffle, re organise, the “establishment” of a new “nation” is re-carving the land. There is a clear association between recarving  / Middle east / Balfour Declaration. The proof was in the pudding. Palestine was later carved up into many new countries. Which brings us back to the new and current carve up you and Ge refer to. I still can’t see it. A 2nd division shift of influence in one or two minor countries in the region does not constitute a recarving of the middle east.

sceptical guy wrote:

I was thinking of the modern Middle East

Then write modern not historically, instead of trying to pull me up for your mistake x

You wrote:

sceptical guy wrote:

Iran/Persia never had any influence historically in the Middle East.

I showed they did, Historically and modern times. Iran have been in Lebanon with Hezbollah for over 30 years, have big influence in Bahrain. Iranian influence in the middle east is nothing new.

One could argue Iran IS in the middle east. If it isn’t in it, it borders it. If it IS in the middle east then its the largest? one of the largest countries, most sophisticated, and home to Shia Islam. How can it not have an influence in its own region. That’s like saying Britain, France or Germany have no influence in Europe.

Unimpressed.

[Morgan.]

jamief wrote:

As Ge says, don,t poke the Russian Bear

What bear Rupert? I can’t see the bear, he’s hiding up in the tree.

There’s a Pride of Lions nearby x

[Morgan.]

supreme overlord paigey wrote:

i personally wouldn’t call the bombing of anything a success

Would you call a bombing raid that wiped out an enemy airfield of jets and preventing them from coming to bomb your home town and house, killing you and your family, a success?

• This reply was modified 7 years, 3 months ago by  Morgan..

[Author]

Posts