Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
@matty wrote:
@rainbowbrite wrote:
I bagsy centre forward! 8)
you is upfront along with me, and somone else.. i might drop back now.. so i can get a better view of your oh so pert bottom
:-
@pikey wrote:
A good point. Also, it often goes unconsidered what would have happened if Blair had wrecked the ‘special relationship’ by refusing to back the Americans up.
Undoubtedly the US would have stopped sharing intelligence with the UK.
The problem states are Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan, Pakistan and Syria.
Now look at where our forces are massed, and note that India is ‘on side’. :wink:@pikey wrote:
He’s been a while. I can feel a hissy fit coming on.
He hasn’t deleted his account for some time. :lol:
@Magoo wrote:
Scum if I didn’t know better I would say a little attempted self gratifying superiority was trying to rear it’s ugly little head yet again, goes down well with the brethren.
Your pathetic attempts to belittle people aren’t self gratifying are they Geoff?
@Bad Manners wrote:
Yeah.
Was the invasion of Iraq any less illegal than the invasion of Poland by the Nazi’s during WW2?
A load of propoganda and scaremongering about Weapons of Mass Destruction and Iraq’s involvement with Al Queda. Both turned out to be untrue.Right or wrong, the US had no choice but to react to the abomination known as 9/11.
:shock: http://www.manboobs.co.uk
@emmalush wrote:
@Mr Bigstuff wrote:
Slaughtering Lebanese civilians will only increase the number of islamic extremists in the world. It’s not in our interest at all.
Might be in the bush/blair/christian fight to keep islam and its nation of people below them.
If only that ‘Christian’ bit wasn’t in there, I’d be all for it. :(
You should only communicate via email or snailmail. That way you have a record of all communications.
NEVER use the phone for anything really important! :wink:
They are rather good, I particularly like the transience. 8)
