Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Bob Marley, 1945 – 1981
Elvis 1935 – 1977Both gone too soon, but both timeless legends.
@sceptical guy wrote:
I like to be liked.
Also I’m ard, unless panda’s dad and the Official Gouger by Appointment to HM the Queen is around
Me fadda, him a go shaaaarpen him machete. Him a chop ya hup!
He’s also got some baked beans and a nice chianti. :P
@sceptical guy wrote:
I’m glad this useless thread is finally dead
The thread is dead. Long live the thread! :P
@jen_jen wrote:
Personally I don’t think Terry has been mobbed. He holds opinions that most people here don’t agree with and they say so. It only appears to be mobbing because he takes any opportunity he can to express the same opinions whenever he can and the same people take issue with them. That said, he has every right to express his opinions, however he has no right to tell others to stop expressing theirs.
=D>
And if you truly are sick of all this racism cr ap, Terry, why start this thread?
You had a good idea how it was going to pan out, didn’t you?
Probably why you started it.
I won’t be posting on it anymore. I’ve said my piece.
@terry wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
And provocation is not a mitigating circumstance.
Yes it is.
I’m getting sick of this racism crap. Everybody is racist anyway. A Polish guy on the train was saying how “tight fisted” people from Leeds are. Another racist ****head who doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Maybe I should heve reported him to the police..?
Provocation in English law is not a mitigating circumstance.
“In English law, provocation was a mitigatory defence alleging a total loss of control as a response to another’s provocative conduct sufficient to convert what would otherwise have been murder into manslaughter. It does not apply to any other offence. It was abolished on 4 October 2010[1] by section 56(1) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.[1] but replaced by a very similar defence of “loss of control.”
Loss of control btw only applies to murder / manslaughter.
What the polish guy said wasn’t racist. You should have reported him though. I reckon the police needed a good laugh.
@mrs_teapot wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@tinks wrote:
@mrs_teapot wrote:
He said it and he should to be punished for it…. not to do so would make a mockery of the law… Besides the victim of the abuse needs to see that justice is done and receive a full apology.
spot on!
Agreed. Top post, Teapot.
Well I didn’t say it to please you Panda… I sort of agree with Terry that you are good at handing out abuse….. but I accept your compliment :D
Oh, you’re not so bad at dishing out abuse yourself, Teapot, even if you are “nice.” :P
@terry wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
@terry wrote:
@panda12 wrote:
BTW poli, just out of interest, have you ever been racially abused?
Poli hasn’t but I have so don’t go thinking you’re the only one who understands the hurt.
Racism is an evil, but there again so is hatred in any form. And you’re no stranger to dishing the abuse out.Oh, you answer for poli now, do you?
:shock:
If need be.
John Terry is being made a scapegoat in this court case. There’s a difference to the verbal abuse he and Ferdinand have dished out to each other compared to someone who is not being provoked yet wielding a broken bottle and shouting “come on the you black ****”.
He’s not a racist, but has been goaded into a reaction by someone (Ferdinand) who was itching for a fight. It was heat of the moment stuff. That’s football, isn’t it…
No, it’s not football, it’s the law. And provocation is not a mitigating circumstance.
I thought you were a football fan, Telboy. Obviously not. You don’t want the beautiful game rid of racism, it seems.
Not a good legacy to leave the youngsters, is it?
@tinks wrote:
@mrs_teapot wrote:
He said it and he should to be punished for it…. not to do so would make a mockery of the law… Besides the victim of the abuse needs to see that justice is done and receive a full apology.
spot on!
Agreed. Top post, Teapot.
