[panda12]

@wordsworth60 wrote:

Terry is right, anyone who makes a professional decision he doesn’t like or for reasons he doesn’t like should go. Simple as.

If he doesn’t like the decision it’s pointless waiting for the results of any inquiry which might reveal the bigger story he acknowledges might exist. Simple as.

I have said something he finds credible or at least possible. Simple as.

Support of a political movement that he wouldn’t personally join shouldn’t bar you from expressing your point of view, unless it’s the PC Brigade. Simple as.

Mrs T’s politics don’t matter, but Kenty’s do, as do (in no particular order) Jen’s, Panda’s and whoever else he decides is in the PC brigade. Simple as.

Someone’s looks are relevant to their decisions about child welfare. Simple as.

You don’t have to be a member of UKIP to want to defend it regardless of the public statements of its key figures. Simple as.

Just because you want to defend UKIP against any criticism or accusation, doesn’t mean you trust it enough to become a member. Simple as.

Telling Kenty to stfu is consistent with a belief in free speech. Simple as.

Stfu is easier to spell than it is to pronounce (at least in English) because of the way the vowel is placed in relation to the consonants. Simple as.

Excellent post, Words. =D> =D> =D>

We should all know by now that only Terry is allowed an opinion. Only Terry can express his views. No one else is allowed to do so.

[panda12]

From the BBC Website:

Joyce Thacker, earlier defended the decision, saying it was influenced by UKIP’s immigration policy.

She said: “I have legal advice I have to follow for the placement of children and I was criticised before for not making sure their cultural and ethnic needs were met.

“If the party mantra is, for example, ending the active promotion of multiculturalism I have to think about that… I have to think of their longer-term needs.

Ms Thacker added she did not think UKIP was a racist party, but said it had “very clear” immigration policies which she could not ignore.”

The children are Eastern European migrants. Seems to me she was thinking of their long term needs.

[panda12]

@kent f OBE wrote:

@terry wrote:

@kent f OBE wrote:

Rusty aren’t you the lucky one…you’re entitled to your opinion :lol:
He graciously said so :roll:

Kenty (please…) stfu.

So from me not allowed an opinion it’s gone to me shutting up…I mean stfu…
You serious? After all your little digs? I have directly answered to some of your posts…that particular one is to Rusty..you feel the need to reply to that one but not the ones to you? Very strange..
I’m not some little immigrant woman who will go away just because you want me to…believe it or not “we” have opinions and guess what…not scared to talk about them
Now if you don’t mind …

Terry’s posts on this thread clearly show his true colours – a racist and a sexist.

It seems women aren’t allowed opinions.

*waits patiently for the real, homophobic Terry to emerge.

[panda12]

@rusty trawler wrote:

The council had a duty of care to the children. Looking out for the children’s needs can never be wrong in my book.

Well said. At the end of the day, the children are European migrants placed with foster parents who openly support UKIP who are openly against European migrants being in this Country.

It’s a no brainer really.

[panda12]

@kent f OBE wrote:

I used to think you weren’t a racist, but you know what Terry? I think you are a racist but in denial.
SUE ME TOO ….and just for good measure heres a little :wink:

He’s suing me first. :wink:

[panda12]

@terry wrote:

@panda12 wrote:

Thanks God you don’t make the rules because if you did, you’d have Kenty and me on the next plane back to our respective “homes.”

I think you just want this country to be British born whites only.

What a disgraceful (and libellous) thing to say and an indication of just how low you’re prepared to sink.

So sue me!

And nobody on these boards sinks as low as you, mate with your racist attitude towards other races, creeds, cultures and disrespect to non Christian religions.

[panda12]

@terry wrote:

@wordsworth60 wrote:

@terry wrote:

@kent f OBE wrote:

In my opinion if the parents are members of the UKIP then it’s the right decision.

In my opinion you should stop being so politically correct and get yourself a life.

So the only possible reason for disapproving of UKIP and believing they are racist is political correctness?

The Rotherham council obviously don’t approve of UKIP. Which means they probably don’t agree with freedom of speech either. Not wanting mass migration to Britain is not actually a crime and won’t be unless Rotherham council, panda or Kenty get to make the rules.

Thanks God you don’t make the rules because if you did, you’d have Kenty and me on the next plane back to our respective “homes.”

I think you just want this country to be British born whites only.

[panda12]

@jen_jen wrote:

* pulls up a chair and gets out the popcorn ready for the Panda and Terry show…don’t think this is about the fostering any longer somehow… :-

Ewww! I’m not doing any show with him.

You can have him. Feed him doughnuts and popcorn and keep him quiet, please. :P

[panda12]

Terry knows they are racist but he’s in denial.

Try reverse psychology on him, tell him they’re not racist and then he’ll disagree with you and insist they are racist.

[panda12]

Or maybe Kenty, these foster parents are racist and had an ulterior motive for fostering these children.

Most children who are abused / injured are abused by people they know and trust.

[Author]

Posts