Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
getting home and opening a bottle of rose and a box of thorntons ~heaven~ 8)
its an unflattering photo, ive seen the show :oops: when errm there was nothing else on, and i thought she looked pretty good. Dark hair suits her better i think.
@minim wrote:
How can you know what is going through his mind? The biological urge to procreate is very strong.
I would have thought her biological urges took a back seat the day she developed penis envy and had her ti.ts chopped off
@johnboy25 wrote:
I was actually sticking to what’s been posted
so was i, you pedantic waste of board space
@minim wrote:
The person carrying the child is a biological woman, who has chosen to want to live as a man. S/he is entitled to have a child if s/he wants to.
The child will have a mother and a father, and it is wanted and will be loved. On another thread there is a discussion about a family whose child went missing and is now the subject of what could very well include child sex abuse.
If I were a child, I know which family I would prefer to be born into.
HELLO, NEWSFLASH!!!! men dont give birth
if the sheman chose to live his life as a man, i fail to see why he would want to give birth, is he a tad confused or what?!!
Its all well and good having a sex change, but for gods sake choose a sex, you cant wonder about being both ffs!
@minim wrote:
Why? I thought babies were found under bushes.
most babies emerge from a bush …unless of course the mother has pre-waxed
@rainbowbrite wrote:
Sorry i should have made it clearer or elaborated on that. If he has those images on his computer and enjoys such things in life then could be capable of other things such as (what was reported) being accused of hitting Shannon. A possible uneasy feeling when around him perhaps?
I agree. If he gets off on nude or por.nographic images of children, nothing can be ruled out at this stage. He had full access to a house full of children for a number of years. At times he must have been left alone with them, bathed them and seen them naked. I cant see how someone who is into child por.n could just switch his feelings on and off between images on a screen and real life children. It makes me shudder to think what he may have done, or was capable of doing.
I cant see how someone can say that “just because he’s into viewing images it doesnt mean he would actually abuse a child himself.”
Why doesnt it?
Thats like someone saying that a man who actively seeks out images of women being raped, ie this is what gets him off, wouldnt if the opportunity presented itself actually rape a woman. The likely hood is that if they thought they might get away with it, they would.
@johnboy25 wrote:
Nobody’s actually condoning seal hunting as far as I can see
doh! what about the people who actually do it?? wouldnt you say they condone it?
