Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
7 February, 2010 at 7:54 pm #430689
@gazlan wrote:
It appears then that no justification can be given for this deviant anal sex…..the comments relating to oral sex are again a deviance from the natural reproductive process and human kind have asserted their own personal self gratification in the carrying out this act…….now, once again i will ask can anyone provide justification for the use of the body`s natural tract for waste disposal for sexual gratification????
Yes it’s easy… both parties consent and take pleasure from anal sex
Whether it’s an act you or I would indulge in is irrelevant
7 February, 2010 at 7:52 pm #430688@gazlan wrote:
they were questions not points.. hence the question marks
As for the last bit you know exactly what my point isLet me again inform you that the opinions i have regarding anal sex carried out by the homosexual are completely free from religious dogma, scriptures or any such religious reference..they aremy thoughts and opinions made with a completely independent free thinking mind……..`normal sex` ……lol….can you relate normal sex to that of anal sex?????
`normal sex` to me is straight forward sexual intercourse in the reproduction and self preservation of human kind…….a natural sequence….. :roll:so you equate the number of times you have had sex with the number of times you have tried to make a woman pregnant… you only have sex when you want to reproduce
sexual intercourse
One entry found.Main Entry: sexual intercourse
Function: noun
Date: 1799
1 : heterosexual intercourse involving penetration of the vagina by the penis : coitus
2 : intercourse (as anal or oral intercourse) that does not involve penetration of the vagina by the penissexual intercourse
1. coitus.
2. any physical contact between two individuals involving stimulation of the genital organs of at least one

Definition 2: “Sexual intercourse” means intercourse, real or simulated, whether genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex or between a human and an animal, or with an artificial genital.7 February, 2010 at 7:36 pm #430684@gazlan wrote:
and “normal” sex is what ffs.. only done when nature wants us to reproduce ? The mouth… breathing and eating, so if you can justify oral sex as anything than for sexual self gratification ?
And who mentioned religious fanatic, more the “I’m religious but i’ll pick and choose which bits” brigade that sticks in my crawAnd your point is?
they were questions not points.. hence the question marks
As for the last bit you know exactly what my point is7 February, 2010 at 7:15 pm #429901@thin ice wrote:
@pete wrote:
@thin ice wrote:
@pete wrote:
The truth is never abusive :wink:
the truth pete
but only as you see i
As many see it to be honest, you’re a dickhead who thinks trying to start squabbles is clever then you boost yourself into a trouble maker, you couldnt make trouble if you tried. I think its the hair myself you probably have to look at it more than most :wink:
pete your dull
very very dull
you’re as in you are not your [-X
7 February, 2010 at 7:09 pm #430678@gazlan wrote:
your argument is that its against nature and you used reproduction as an example of this ergo oral sex is an abomination. As for religion you cant argue devoutness for any religion if you’re only going to adhere to the teachings you agree with, it’s all or nothing not selective
In terms of reproduction, it is a natural system…….the anal orifice is also a natural way for disposing of waste……..how on this earth any natural minded person can equate the anus with sexual pleasure is beyond all reason…….in my opinion….an opinion based soley on my own thinking mind with no reference to any religious dogma at all….people always assume that to discredit the act of the homosexual is that the person who discredits it is a religious fanatic…….this in my opinion is narrow minded…..now, if you can justify the use of the anus other than for sexual self gratification by the homosexual then lets have it…..
the opinion that is.and “normal” sex is what ffs.. only done when nature wants us to reproduce ? The mouth… breathing and eating, so if you can justify oral sex as anything than for sexual self gratification ?
And who mentioned religious fanatic, more the “I’m religious but i’ll pick and choose which bits” brigade that sticks in my craw7 February, 2010 at 5:16 pm #430660@gazlan wrote:
@pete wrote:
Where does oral sex add to reproduction ?
It doesnt….it was you who brought it into this thread as well as paedophilia :roll:
your argument is that its against nature and you used reproduction as an example of this ergo oral sex is an abomination. As for religion you cant argue devoutness for any religion if you’re only going to adhere to the teachings you agree with, it’s all or nothing not selective
7 February, 2010 at 4:17 pm #430648Where does oral sex add to reproduction ?
7 February, 2010 at 4:08 pm #430646Repeatedly quoting what you’ve already quoted doesn’t add to the debate. Oral sex is therefore un-natural as is masturbation
7 February, 2010 at 4:02 pm #430643But then i guess paedophilia is the way people feel, can paedophiles help being attracted to children. I’m of course not condoning it at all, having paedophilic “feelings” and acting on those feelings are different things. My point is people cant help their genetic/hormonal programming but they can choose not to act on these desires. Paedophilia is one set of desires that can NEVER be allowed to be acted on, should we see homosexuality in the same light or should we “tolerate” it
7 February, 2010 at 3:54 pm #430640If it’s a matter of genetics then it cant be classed as a deviation from nature surely.
-
AuthorPosts
