[Pete]

I’d agree totally if tobacco could still be advertised then they could attract new smokers from the advertising. I dont think established smokers will change brands and as i understand it the government are looking to tobacco products being sold from under the counter so any point of sales logo wont help anyway if they implement that

[Pete]

you choose what you usually smoke, this might work with new smokers or will the tobacco companies just save on branding costs and sell their cigarettes cheaper

[Pete]

@minim wrote:

Ask the companies who spend millions on branding and image.

Now they can spend nothing and make even bigger profits

[Pete]

I cant see how a plain packet with Benson and Hedges printed on it is going to be less profitable than a gold coloured packet

[Pete]

Just the one chipolata she asked me

[Pete]

of course

[Pete]

Be a blow to the plumber thats for certain

[Pete]

I went to sainsburys in my slippers

[Pete]

@woohoo wrote:

Shows they have confidence though! What’s the problem?.. At least these people are clothed! IF they appear naked, then thats when we should start worrying! I had no complaints when I went to the 24 hour garage on Horse-Back, wearing nothing but a Gimp Mask and Borat style thong. :lol:

*Calls Pete*.. (Picture Please).. :lol:

*shudders*

[Pete]

I know but ultimately you can understand what made them do it, publish papers on it , receive accolades and awards but you cannot release them. You cant take the chance, it’s as big a tragedy to release one person who kills again as it is to hang an innocent man (or woman)

[Author]

Posts