Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
:D :D
yup all i do is whinge lol
hang on let me find 1 thread i have started where i have complained about anything??i think you will find that my cpmplaining as you put it nothing like that it is merely asking people to put their petty complaints into perpective, so you got booted, are you alive? yes! has anyone been harmed? no.
so get over it move on.
but i forgot its me who complains and whinges
and starts threads about it too…….
who’s thread am i replying to?
Good for him!
make some money! good on him i say!
i dont know one person in the world who would say not to the money at his age and in his situation
rubbish at times people need to be booted for no reason!
lets say someone is in a chatting room and puts someone elses address in there? or phone number?
should the guide then say
excuse me dont do that again or you wil be ejected!!
or shoujld they boot them out straight awa before they get a chance to do it again?
and sweetasbaileez calm down ffs! its a chatroom so you got booted with no warning, i was merely as shocked as you because you done NOTHING wrong at all not one thing and yet you got booted for doing absolutely nothing wrong.
i dont mean to sound cynical here, but who am i to believe?
someone who asked me to commit suicide because i dared answer them back?
or a chatguide?
il stick with the chatguides for now
until boots get some more razor blades in…
Hi welcome to justchat
dont expect people to be friendly from the beginning, as they tend to suspect new people as old regular users using a different name in order to cause very litle mayhem but it pleases them.
but if you are new then welcome have fun here
iv not been booted before
but i would guess that you where probably being abusive or had a stupid name?
or of course you where just merely in a room and where chatting nicely with no foul language or sexual or offensive comments?
@forumhostpb wrote:
I beg to differ TM. I think that you CAN dictate to people how they will apologise – especially if you start off with the right amount of self-righteous indignation. You can then, having taken the moral high ground, refuse to accept an apology on whatever basis is convenient to you at the time.
Insincerity is the usual ground for rejection, and one can then dictate to the apologiser how, when, and in what terms they should apologise. The substitute apology can then be accepted with as much bad grace as possible.
In this instance, it is quite clear that your earlier apology was utterly inadequate and under the circumstances, it was totally rejected. You now must revise your previous apology, making it sound far more sincere, and perhaps include some sort of anecdotal evidence of your contrition coupled with a believable promise not to repeat the offence again.
il skip this one for now :D
@emmalush wrote:
@token_male wrote:
only the teams that can afford to have hudreds of multi angled cameras at their ground would benefit from it!
Hundreds?? TV would fund the cameras via the tv deals in the “professional” game.
you think television would fund cameras for every football league team?
92 teams? all being bought cameras by a tv company to enable this rule to come into play?it wouldnt happen only the premier league and the championship would benefit from this ruling
only the teams that can afford to have hudreds of multi angled cameras at their ground would benefit from it!
sounds very lets keep the rich rich.
example here FA cup 4th round game non league team against a premier league team?
the non league team would lose out, as they woujldnt have the facilities to have the game at their own ground would they. even if tey got their seating sorted and the pitch, they would then ened to get more moeny to buy cameras and put them all over the pitch
the porr lose out on this one emma, this is a very tory idea.
i just dont see how tv replays will make it better i seriously dont, the game is good as it is! instead of replays how about sorting out the players diving first? the refs see it happen and dont do nothing about it, or maybe giving more power to the linesman or the 4th official? if they see its a dive then let them call it, they dont need to stop the whole game while someone takes a look at different angles of a video replay to get the best view on it all.
it would make the game become too slow, no momentum woujld be gained because teams wouldnt have time to build up any.
see i was going to send cas a pm apologising for grinning at the thread, now i will not be sending an apology nor will i be posting one in here,
you cant dictate to people how they will apologise.
Honestly no, it doesnt annoy me, very few things do to be honest.
i choose other things to annoy myself with (rubiks puzzles, arrow words etc)
life is far too short to be worrying about it.
so the BBC clled the fa cup by its full title.
to say they arent allowed to endorse things would mean that on match of the day they would have to blur out all the billboards around the pitches and on the teams shirts.
